Erlotinib
DrugErlotinib was provided in the retail versions of the product.
Other names: Tarceva
NCT Number: NCT01161173
This observational study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of Tarceva (erlotinib) in routine clinical practice as second-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic non-small dell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data will be collected from patients who have received 1 course of standard systemic chemotherapy, experienced disease progression, and who are receiveingTarceva in a second-line setting. Patients will also be followed through third-line treatment if there is disease progression on Tarceva therapy.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Aalst, Belgium
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Erlotinib was provided in the retail versions of the product.
Other names: Tarceva
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 4 months)
The best overall response to treatment was determined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. A CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions (TL) or the disappearance of all non-TLs. A PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of TLs, taking as reference the baseline SLD. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for a PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest SLD since treatment started for TLs and the persistence of 1 or more non-TL(s). PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. For the best overall responses of CR and PR, a response was "confirmed" if a subsequent RECIST evaluation also showed a CR or PR.
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 4 months)
The time to disease progression was defined as the time from Baseline until disease progression as determined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from Baseline until disease progression or death from any cause. Progressive disease was determined by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Progressive disease was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter recorded since treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Overall survival was defined as the time from Baseline until or death from any cause
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 4 months)
Study participants and treating physicians completed the LCSS, a measure of Quality of Life (QoL), at Baseline and throughout the study. The patient LCSS measures 6 major symptoms, the Symptom Burden Index (SBI), associated with lung malignancies (3 thoracic [cough, dyspnea, haemoptysis] and 3 general symptoms [loss of appetite, fatigue, pain]) and 3 additional scores (overall symptomatic distress, interference with daily activities, global QoL), each on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (0=no impairment, 100=maximum impairment). The physician LCSS evaluates the 6 lung malignancy associated symptoms, the SBI, on an ordinal scale (100=none, 75=mild, 50=moderate, 25=marked, 0=severe). The average of the patient and physician SBI scores (6 symptoms) and the average of the patient total score (9 symptoms) ranged from 0 to 100, with a higher patient and a lower physician score indicating more impairment. A negative patient and a positive physician change score indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline to the end of the study (up to 4 years, 4 months)
At each study visit, the presence of skin rash was graded using the Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC), with grade 0 = no rash, grade 1 = mild, grade 2 = moderate, grade 3 = severe, and grade 4 = life threatening or disabling rash. Reported is the percentage of participants who developed a grade ≥ 1 rash.
Hoffmann-La Roche
Industry
A Non-interventional Study to Follow and Evaluate Patients With Advanced NSCLC Who Are Treated in Second Line Setting With Tarceva (Erlotinib) in a "Real Life" Clinical Setting
Acronym: TEAM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03846310
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01705184
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Avignon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT03380871
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Santa Monica, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02049060
Adenoma, Lung Diseases
Rozzano, Milan, Italy
View Trial Details