Orthopaedic Clinic of Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, General Hospital of Papanikolaou
Thessaloniki, 57010, Greece
NCT Number: NCT03811145
Current treatments for lateral epicondylitis include: rest, behaviour modification and physiotherapy, anti-inflammatory medication - both steroidal and non-steroidal, and surgery. Current experimental therapies include muscle relaxants to reduce muscle tone and force on the epicondyle, laser therapy to stimulate collagen production, and blood based therapies including the injection of autologous blood and protein rich plasma.
Cell Therapy Ltd (trading as Celixir) has developed a regenerative gel that combines isolated allogeneic platelet growth factors and a cellulose-derivative gel.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Thessaloniki, 57010, Greece
Lateral epicondylitis, also called "tennis elbow" is a common condition affecting 1 to 3% of the population; most commonly individuals aged 35 to 55 years. It is frequently self limiting but can lead to refractory symptoms in a minority of cases. Pain is localised to the lateral epicondyle of the elbow at the point of insertion of the common extensor tendon. Although associated with repetitive movement of the extensor muscles of the forearm, frequently no precipitating cause can be discerned.
The term "epicondylitis" is a misnomer as histological investigations have revealed that there is only limited inflammation, and the term "epicondylosis" should be employed, due to the degenerative nature of the condition.
The condition is divided in to 4 stages, though progression may not occur through all four. Firstly, there is acute inflammation that is quick to resolve. Secondly, prolonged injury results in an increase in fibroblasts, vascular hyperplasia, disorganised collagen disposition and degeneration of the tendon. Thirdly, further accumulation of structural alterations leads to partial or complete tendon rupture. Stage 4 exhibits the same features as 2 and 3 but with the addition of calcification.
Current treatments for lateral epicondylitis include: rest, behaviour modification and physiotherapy, anti-inflammatory medication both steroidal and non-steroidal, and surgery. Current experimental therapies include muscle relaxants to reduce muscle tone and force on the epicondyle, laser therapy to stimulate collagen production, and blood based therapies including the injection of autologous blood and protein rich plasma. Trials of the latter two treatments give conflicting results due to variations in protocol and trial design.
Cell Therapy Ltd has developed a regenerative gel, Tendoncel, that combines isolated platelet growth factors and cellulose-derivative gel. Tendoncel consists of a proprietary platelet lysate formulation that is easy to apply to the skin.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Platelet lysate gel
Placebo control gel
Time frame: Baseline
15 question questionnaire measuring pain and function. Total scores from 15 questions compared - pain and function combined. Scale: 10 to 100 (best to worst). Difference between test and control scores compared.
Time frame: Day 23 (end of treatment).
15 question questionnaire measuring pain and function. Total scores from 15 questions compared - pain and function combined. Scale: 10 to 100 (best to worst). Difference between test and control scores compared.
Time frame: 4 weeks follow up
15 question questionnaire measuring pain and function. Total scores from 15 questions compared - pain and function combined. Scale: 10 to 100 (best to worst). Difference between test and control scores compared.
Time frame: 6 weeks follow up.
15 question questionnaire measuring pain and function. Total scores from 15 questions compared - pain and function combined. Scale: 10 to 100 (best to worst). Difference between test and control scores compared.
Time frame: 3 months follow up.
15 question questionnaire measuring pain and function. Total scores from 15 questions compared - pain and function combined. Scale: 10 to 100 (best to worst). Difference between test and control scores compared.
Time frame: Mean of 47 weeks follow up.
15 question questionnaire measuring pain and function. Total scores from 15 questions compared - pain and function combined. Scale: 10 to 100 (best to worst). Difference between test and control scores compared.
Time frame: Baseline
30 question questionnaire measuring disabilities of the upper limb. Scale from 0 to 100 (best to worst). Difference between test and control scores compared.
Time frame: Day 23.
30 question questionnaire measuring disabilities of the upper limb. Scale from 0 to 100 (best to worst). Difference between test and control scores compared.
Time frame: 4 week follow up.
30 question questionnaire measuring disabilities of the upper limb. Scale from 0 to 100 (best to worst). Difference between test and control scores compared.
Time frame: 6 week follow up.
30 question questionnaire measuring disabilities of the upper limb. Scale from 0 to 100 (best to worst). Difference between test and control scores compared.
Time frame: 3 months follow up
30 question questionnaire measuring disabilities of the upper limb. Scale from 0 to 100 (best to worst). Difference between test and control scores compared.
Time frame: Mean of 47 weeks follow up.
30 question questionnaire measuring disabilities of the upper limb. Scale from 0 to 100 (best to worst). Difference between test and control scores compared.
Time frame: Baseline
Measured using a dynamometer. Results compared between test and control elbows, and between study and contralateral elbow (internal control).
Time frame: Day 23
Measured using a dynamometer. Results compared between test and control elbows, and between study and contralateral elbow (internal control).
Time frame: Mean of 47 weeks follow up (final follow up).
Measured using a dynamometer. Results compared between test and control elbows, and between study and contralateral elbow (internal control).
Time frame: Day 3 (1st treatment visit), day 7, day 14, day 21, day 23 (end of treatment). Follow ups: 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and mean of 47 weeks.
Measured by participant questionnaire. Comparison of the number of participants in each group with cutaneous events - "redness", "rash", "swelling" or changes at gel site. Classed as none, mild, moderate or severe. Plus any other event mentioned by the participants.
Time frame: Baseline
Measurement of blood IgE levels. Test and control averages compared. Normal is <100IU/mL.
Time frame: Day 7
Measurement of blood IgE levels. Test and control averages compared. Normal is <100IU/mL.
Time frame: Day 23
Measurement of blood IgE levels. Test and control averages compared. Normal is <100IU/mL.
Time frame: Baseline, day 7 and day 23.
Measurement of blood IgE levels. Comparison of the number of participants in each group, test and control, with a normal baseline reading of blood IgE and a subsequently elevated IgE reading. Normal is <100IU/mL.
Cell Therapy Ltd.
Industry
A Double-Blind Randomised Placebo-controlled Phase IIb Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy & Safety of a Novel Platelet Lysate Gel in the Treatment of Lateral Epicondylitis
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07667491
Arm Injuries, Elbow Injuries
Leiria, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT07424794
Arm Injuries, Elbow Injuries
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07627932
Arm Injuries, Elbow Injuries
Izmir, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07620678
Arm Injuries, Elbow Injuries
Ankara, Cankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details