Family Transitions- Programs that Work, LLC
Mesa, Arizona, 85209, United States
Completed
NCT Number: NCT05209932
An Internet Based Adaptation of a Divorce Intervention Beginnings Program for Divorced Parents
This study is a two-armed randomized controlled trial of the eNew Beginnings Program (eNBP)'s effects on children's mental health problems as well as interparental conflict, parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline. The eNBP is an asynchronous, fully web-based program that was based on the in-person, group NBP, which has been found to strengthen parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline and reduce children's mental health problems in three randomized controlled trials of the NBP involving over 1,800 children. The investigators hypothesized that parents in the eNBP intervention condition would have less interparental conflict and higher parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline than those in the wait-list control condition. The investigators also expected the children whose parents were in the eNBP intervention condition would have fewer internalizing problems and externalizing problems and higher prosocial skills than those with parents in the wait-list control.
Completed
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
About this study
This study is a two-armed intervention randomized controlled trial of the eNew Beginnings Program (eNBP)'s effects on children's mental health problems as well as interparental conflict, parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline. The eNBP is an asynchronous, fully web-based program that was based on the in-person, group-based NBP. Three randomized controlled trials of the NBP involving over 1,800 children found positive effects to strengthen parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline and reduce children's mental health problems. The eNBP teaches all the skills in the 10-session NBP. The investigators hypothesized that parents in the eNBP would have less interparental conflict and higher parent-child relationship quality and effective discipline than those in the wait-list control condition following the intervention. The investigators also expected the children whose parents were in the eNBP would have fewer internalizing problems and externalizing problems and higher prosocial skills than those with parents in the wait-list control following the intervention.
Parents and their offspring were recruited using Qualtrics, a leading-edge sample acquisition technology that partners with 20 online panel providers and recruits nationally. Initial sampling criteria were parent was divorced, separated but never married, divorcing, or separating; had one or more children aged 6 to 18; and spoke English. Parents who met these criteria were sent an email with information about the study and a web-based survey that assessed contact with child/ren, access to a computer with high-speed internet or a smart phone and demographics. Interested parents were provided additional information about the study and screened for eligibility by phone. To be eligible, parents had to be divorced, separated but never married, divorcing or separating; have one or more child between 6 and 18; be English speaking; spend at least three hours/week or at least one overnight every other week with their child(ren); and have access to a computer with high-speed internet or a smart phone. The sample consisted of 131 parents randomized to eNBP (N = 81) or wait-list condition (N = 50) and 102 of their adolescent offspring.
Primary outcome measures were measures of interparental conflict, parent-child relationship quality, effective discipline and children's internalizing and externalizing problems and prosocial behavior.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Parents divorced, divorcing or separated
- Parents separated but never married
- One or more children aged 6 to 18
- Parents spoke English
- Parents spend at least 3 hours a week with children or have one overnight every other week with their children
- Parents have access to a computer with high speed internet access of a smart phone
Exclusion criteria
- Parents who do not meet all of the inclusion criteria
Treatment and study plan
Online New Beginnings Program (eNBP)
BehavioralThe eNBP is a five-hour, asynchronous, fully web-based adaptation of the group-based NBP that can be used on a smart phone, tablet or computer. Separate versions for fathers and mothers consist of the same didactic content and interactive exercises, with gender appropriate references, testimonials and video skills demonstrations.
Primary outcomes
-
Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale (Grych et al., 1992) -- Children Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
15-item scale assessing frequency and intensity of interparental conflict as reported by children. Minimum score = 1; Maximum score = 3. High score is worse outcome
-
Children's Perception of Interparental Conflict Scale (Grych et al., 1992) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: One month
15-item scale assessing frequency and intensity of interparental conflict as reported by parents. Minimum score = 1; Maximum score = 3. High score is worse outcome
-
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Acceptance Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
16-item scales to assess parental acceptance completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
-
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Acceptance Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Child Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
16-item scales to assess parental acceptance completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
-
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Rejection Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
16-item scales to assess parental rejection completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is worse outcome.
-
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Rejection Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Child Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
16-item scales to assess parental rejection completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is worse outcome.
-
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Consistency Discipline Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
8-item scales to assess parental consistency of discipline completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
-
Children's Report of Parent Behavior Inventory -- Consistency Discipline Subscale (Shaefer, 1965) -- Child Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
8-item scales to assess parental consistency of discipline completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
-
Oregon Discipline Scale - Follow-Through (Oregon Social Learning Center, 1991) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
11-item scales to assess parental follow-through of discipline completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
-
Oregon Discipline Scale - Follow-Through (Oregon Social Learning Center, 1991) -- Child Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
7-item scales to assess parental follow-through of discipline completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
-
Child Monitoring Scale (Hetherington et al., 1992) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
9-item scales to assess parental monitoring of child behaviors with friends and at school completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
-
Child Monitoring Scale (Hetherington et al., 1992) -- Child Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
9-item scales to assess parental monitoring of child behaviors with friends and at school completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
-
Parent Adolescent Communication Scale (Barnes & Olson, 1985) -- Parent Report
Time frame: 1 month
10-item scale to assess parent-child communication completed by parents. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 5. High score is better outcome.
-
Caught in the Middle Scale (Buchanan et al., 1991) -- Child Report
Time frame: 1 month
7-item scales to assess children being caught in the middle between parents completed by children. Minimum score = 1. Maximum score = 4. High score is worse outcome.
-
Brief Problem Monitor -- Externalizing Subscale (Achenbach et al., 2011) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
7-item scale assessing child externalizing problems as reported by parents. The sum score of the items (range 0-2 for each item) for each individual is converted to T-score, using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). High score is worse outcome.
-
Brief Problem Monitor -- Externalizing Subscale (Achenbach et al., 2011) -- Child Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
7-item scale assessing child externalizing problems as reported by children. Item scores range from 0-2, a sum score across the items was computed and converted to a T-score using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Score of 50 = the fiftieth percentile of the normative sample. (Achenbach & Rescola, 2001). T-scores of 65 and above are considered sufficiently elevated to be of concern.
The values shown are the T-score values for the sample. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
-
Brief Problem Monitor -- Internalizing Subscale (Achenbach et al., 2011) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
6-item scale assessing child internalizing problems as reported by parents. Item scores range from 0-2, a sum score across the items was computed and converted to a T-score using the algorithm purchased from ASEBA (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment). The range of the T-scores is: 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum). Score of 50 = the fiftieth percentile of the normative sample. (Achenbach & Rescola, 2001). T-scores of 65 and above are considered sufficiently elevated to be of concern.
The values shown are the T-score values for the sample. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome..
Secondary outcomes
-
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire -- Prosocial Subscale (Goodman, 2001) -- Parent Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
5-item scale assessing child prosocial skills as reported by parents. Each of the 5 items is scored 0-2. The score reported is the mean item score. A high score is a better outcome.
-
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire -- Prosocial Subscale (Goodman, 2001) -- Child Report Version
Time frame: 1 month
Each of the 5 items is scored 0-2 (range 0-10). The score reported is the mean of the total scores. A higher score is a better outcome.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Family Transitions: Programs that Work
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
Development and Evaluation of an Internet Based Adaptation of the New Beginnings Program for Divorced Parents
Important dates
- Study start
- 2020
- Primary completion
- 2021
- Study completion
- 2021
- First posted
- Jan 27, 2022
- Registry last updated
- Jan 25, 2023
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Completed
Multi-court Trial of NBP to Prevent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders (MTC)
NCT06132971
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Divorce
Tempe, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details