Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02479958

An in Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy on Deciduous Carious Dentin

Despite of the decline of dental caries, this disease is still common in polarized groups affecting children. Therefore, the aim of this randomized blind in vivo study was to compare the antimicrobial effect of two antimicrobial therapies in deciduous carious dentin. Thirty two patients aging from 5 to 7 years old had partial caries removal in deep carious dentin lesion in deciduous molar and were divided in three groups: 1. Control - chlorhexidine and resin modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC); 2. LEDTB - antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (APDT) with LED (light emission diode) associated with toluidine blue orto dye solution and RMGIC; 3. LMB - APDT with laser associated with methylene blue dye solution and RMGIC. The patients were submitted to initial clinical and radiographic examination and demographic features were evaluated by biofilm, gingival, and dmft/dmfs indexes, besides clinical and radiographic follow up at 6 and 12 months after the treatments. The carious dentin was collected before and after each treatment and the number of Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, Lactobacillus casei, Fusobacterium nucleatum, Atopobium rimae and total bacteria were established by quantitative PCR.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

5 year–7 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 1

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Inclusion criteria consisted of good general health, without syndromes or chronic systemic diseases. They should also have at least one primary molar with deep carious lesion (2/3 of dentin) without pain symptomatology and compatible with reversible pulpits.

Exclusion criteria

  • Children whose parents refused to sign the informed consent document, who did not cooperate with the clinical exams, whose teeth had the treatment choice changed (pain or evolution to irreversible pulpits), who did not attend to the appointments for the scheduled treatments, or who needed antibiotics treatment for other medical reasons were excluded from the study without prejudice.

Treatment and study plan

Rubber Dam Isolation

Procedure

Tooth was isolated using a rubber dam isolation in order to collect the dentin samples

Tooth drying

Procedure

The tooth was dried with air jet.

Dentin wash with chlorhexidine 2%

Procedure

Partial carious tissue was removed with conventional dentinal curette and collection of dentin with a micropunch (Ø = 1mm) was performed. The remaining dentin was washed with chlorhexidine 2%. After that a a new dentin collection was performed at another site of the cavity, and restoration with resin-modified glass ionomer cement was placed.

Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy 1

Procedure

Partial carious tissue was removed with conventional dentine curette and collection of dentin with a micropunch (Ø = 1mm) was performed. The remaining dentin was washed with 200 µL of O-Toluidine blue dye (0.1 mg/mL) for 60 s. After this, a red LED light source with wavelength of 630 nm was used at 100 mW power, 9.0 J of energy, for 60 s with energy density of 30.0 J/cm2 . A new dentin collection was performed after this treatment at another site of the cavity and restoration with resin-modified glass ionomer cement Vitremer was placed.

Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy 2

Procedure

Partial carious tissue was removed with conventional dentine curette and initial collection of dentin with a micropunch (Ø = 1mm) was performed. Treatment of the remaining dentin was performed with 200 µL of methylene blue dye 0.01% for 5 min and after this, a red low level LASER light source with wavelength of 660 nm was used at 100 mW power, 9.0 J of energy, for 90 s with energy density of 320.0 J/cm2 . A new dentin collection was performed after this treatment at another site of the cavity and restoration with resin-modified glass ionomer cement was placed.

Primary outcomes

  1. Quantification of Bacteria by quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)

    Time frame: 15 days after dentin collection

    Quantification of S. mutans, L. casei, F. nucleatum, A. rimae and total bacteria by PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Tooth Pain

    Time frame: 6 months

    Patients reported the presence or absence of tooth pain after 6 months

  2. Tooth Pain

    Time frame: 12 months

    Patients reported the presence or absence of tooth pain after 6 months

  3. Restoration Quality

    Time frame: 6 months

    The quality of restoration was evaluated through the absence of radiographic radiolucent area after 6 months

  4. Restoration Quality

    Time frame: 12 months

    The quality of restoration was evaluated through the absence of radiographic radiolucent area after 12 months

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo

Other

Collaborators

  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Registry information

Official study title

A Randomized in Vitro Evaluation of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy on Deciduous Carious Dentin

Important dates

Study start
2011
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2014
First posted
Jun 24, 2015
Registry last updated
Jun 25, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.