Inlay Bristow
ProcedureA modified Bristow procedure
Other names: Cuistow
NCT Number: NCT04949217
To evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of arthroscopic inlay bristow procedure in treating recurrent anterior shoulder instability.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Aim: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes following the arthroscopic Chinese Unique Inlay Bristow (Cuistow) procedure and the arthroscopic Bristow procedure.
Background: The Cuistow procedure is a modified Bristow surgery in which a Mortise and Tenon structure was added to the contact surface between the coracoid tip and the glenoid. In previous retrospective study, patients received Cuistow procedure have satisfying clinical performance and excellent postoperative bone healing rate (96.1%). However, no prospective randomized controlled trial was performed.
Methods: 70 patients with recurrent anterior shoulder instability were included and randomized to either an arthroscopic Cuistow procedure or arthroscopic Bristow procedure. Radiological evaluations with 3D CT scan were performed preoperatively, immediately after the operation, and postoperatively at three months and during the final follow-up (more than 2 years). Clinical assessment for a minimum of 24 months including the 10-point visual analog scale for pain and subjective instability, University of California at Los Angeles scoring system (UCLA score), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES score), ROWE score, Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV) and active range of motion were completed by independent observers and analyzed.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A modified Bristow procedure
Other names: Cuistow
Traditional Bristow procedure
Time frame: 3-month postoperatily
Bone healing was observed in 3D-CT. The bone healing rate was obtained by dividing the number of people who achieved bone healing by the total number of people
Time frame: 2-year postoperatively
Bone healing was observed in 3DCT. The bone healing rate was obtained by dividing the number of people who achieved bone healing by the total number of people
Time frame: 2-year postoperatively
The ASES score (Michener 2002) is a 10-item measure of shoulder pain and function. Pain is assessed on a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS) and accounts for 50% of the total score. The remaining 50% of the score is determined by the responses to 10 4-point Likert-scale questions related to physical function.
Time frame: 2-year postoperatively
The dislocation rate was obtained by dividing the number of people who dislocated postopratively by the total number of people
Time frame: 2-year postoperatively
The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score is the most commonly used to describe pain levels in patients, ranging from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating more intense pain.
Time frame: 2-year postoperatively
internal rotation at the side, and external and internal rotation at 90° of abduction
Peking University Third Hospital
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07544485
Disease Attributes, Emergencies
Basel, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06470789
Blood Flow Restriction Training, Joint Diseases
Wuhan, Hubei, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05443295
Behavior, Fatigue
Málaga, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03154957
Joint Diseases, Joint Dislocations
Strasbourg, France
View Trial Details