Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
NCT Number: NCT05709860
This study is being conducted to investigate a strategy that may improve knowledge and uptake of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention (PrEP) among cisgender women in primary care.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States
Members of the study team previously developed and evaluated the Electronic health record Medication Complete Communication (EMC2) strategy to 'hardwire' provider/patient communication & surveillance of select prescription (Rx) medications. EMC2 PrEP will adapt from the previous strategy to
The current study aims are to:
Aim 1: Refine and implement an electronic health record (EHR)-based strategy as a potential quality improvement activity that supports informed decision-making and PrEP uptake among women with increased HIV vulnerability in primary care (the EMC2 PrEP strategy).
Aim 2: Pilot-test the EMC2 PrEP strategy in primary care to determine its feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy among women with increased vulnerability to HIV.
Aim 3: Develop a standard operating protocol (SOP) for disseminating the EMC2 PrEP strategy to a national network of federally qualified health centers.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients will receive an interactive PrEP Educational Tool. This interactive tool will be securely sent via the patient portal. After logging into their portal, patients will have the opportunity to review the information on their own time.
Within the interactive PrEP Educational Tool, patients who choose to will have the opportunity to discretely schedule a dedicated PrEP visit with a primary care clinician trained on PrEP delivery. The clinician will have time reserved to allow for 'rapid' scheduling.
Time frame: 6 months
PrEP uptake will be measured during the intervention period between study arms to investigate the effects of the EMC2 PrEP strategy.
Time frame: 2-6 weeks
A 10-item questionnaire, developed by the study team and the scientific literature, will be used to evaluate knowledge of pre-exposure prophylaxis among study participants. Correctly answered questions will be summed (0 to 10) for a total score. Higher scores will indicate greater PrEP knowledge.
Time frame: 2-6 weeks
The 8-item Perceived Risk of HIV scale is used to assess how vulnerable an individual feels to HIV. The scale was developed in the United States and attention was paid to health literacy. Response options vary for each item, though they are measured on a 4-point Likert scale. Total score of 8 items is calculated and range from 10 to 40. Higher scores mean higher perceived risk of HIV.
Time frame: 2-6 weeks
A PrEP Attitudes 5-items scale (Walsh, 2019) is used to assess attitudes toward PrEP, each item is measured on a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree). A total score is calculated and range from 5 to 25. Higher scores mean more stigma towards PrEP use.
Time frame: 2-6 weeks
CHEW health literacy is used to assess participant's health literacy level. Participants were asked three questions about difficulty in understanding medical materials and information, the options range from all of the time to none of the time. The responses of the three questions are then categorized into limited and adequate health literacy level. We used CHEW health literacy because the measure can be conducted over phone calls.
Time frame: 2-6 weeks
A modified version of our team's 10-item Consumer Health Activation Index (CHAI) is used to assess participant's engagement in healthcare. Response options are a Likert scale; linear transformation is used to put total scores onto a 0-100 scale, with higher numbers indicating greater activation. The total scores are then categorized into 3 categories: Low (0-79), Moderate (80-94), and High (>94).
Time frame: 2-6 weeks
The participants in the intervention group were asked two questions about 1) whether they received a PrEP decision guide, and 2) did they read or review it, to assess the acceptability of the intervention material.
Time frame: 2-6 weeks
Using 10-point Likert scale response options (1=very unsatisfied to 10=very satisfied), participants in the intervention group are asked to rate their satisfaction with the materials.
Northwestern University
Other
Adaptation and Pilot Test of an Electronic Health Record-based Approach to Increase PrEP Knowledge and Uptake: the EMC2 PrEP Strategy
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05388474
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03284710
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Maputo, Mozambique
View Trial DetailsNCT02591420
Blood-Borne Infections, Communicable Diseases
Kericho, Kenya
View Trial DetailsNCT02447159
Behavior, Blood-Borne Infections
Eket, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria
View Trial Details