Placebo
DrugFilm-coated tablet
Oral administration
NCT Number: NCT00751881
The primary objective of the study was to assess the effect of two doses of teriflunomide, in comparison to placebo, on the frequency of multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses in participants with relapsing MS.
Key secondary objective was to assess the effect of the two doses of teriflunomide, in comparison to placebo, on disability progression.
Other secondary objectives were:
* To assess the effect of the two doses of teriflunomide in comparison to placebo on:
* Fatigue; * Health-related quality of life, a measure of the impact of the participant's health on his or her overall well being. * To evaluate the safety and tolerability of teriflunomide.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Sanofi-Aventis Investigational Site Number 036005, Bedford Park, Australia
The study consists of:
The overall treatment period was followed by a 4-week elimination follow-up period.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Film-coated tablet
Oral administration
Film-coated tablet
Oral administration
Other names: HMR1726
Time frame: Core treatment period between 48 - 152 weeks depending on time of enrollment
ARR is obtained from the total number of confirmed relapses that occurred during the treatment period divided by the sum of treatment durations.
Each episode of relapse - appearance, or worsening of a clinical symptom that was stable for at least 30 days, that persisted for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever - was to be confirmed by an increase in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score or Functional System scores.
To account for the different treatment durations among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses as response variable; log-transformed treatment duration as "offset" variable; treatment group, region of enrollment and baseline EDSS stratum as covariates).
Time frame: Core treatment period between 48 - 152 weeks depending on time of enrollment
Probability of disability progression at 24, 48, 108 and 132 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on the time to disability progression defined as the time from randomization to first 12-week sustained disability progression [i.e. increase from baseline of at least 1 point in EDSS score (at least 0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS score >5.5) that persisted for at least 12 weeks].
Participants free of disability progression (no disability progression observed on treatment) were censored at the date of the last on-treatment EDSS evaluation.
Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t. Probability of event at time t is 1 minus the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t.
Time frame: Core treatment period between 48 - 152 weeks depending on time of enrollment
Probability of no relapse at 24, 48, 108 and 132 weeks was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on the time to relapse defined as the time from randomization to first EDSS confirmed relapse.
Participants free of confirmed relapse (no EDSS confirmed relapse observed on treatment) were censored at the date of the last study drug intake.
Time frame: Baseline (before randomization), Week 12, Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48
EDSS is an ordinal scale in half-point increments that qualifies disability in participants with MS. It consists of 8 ordinal rating scales assessing 7 functional systems (visual, brainstem, pyramidal, cerebellar, sensory, bowel/bladder and cerebral) as well as ambulation.
EDSS total score ranges from 0 (normal neurological examination) to 10 (death due to MS).
Baseline adjusted least-squares means at Week 48 were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) on EDSS score data (treatment group, region of enrollment, baseline EDSS stratum, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline-by-visit interaction as factors). All the timepoints from randomization up to Week 48 were included in the model.
Time frame: Baseline (before randomization), Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
FIS is a participants-reported scale that qualifies the impact of fatigue on daily life in participants with MS. It consists of 40 statements that measure fatigue in 3 areas; physical, cognitive, and social.
FIS total score ranges from 0 (no problem) to 160 (extreme problem).
Baseline adjusted least-squares means at week 48 were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures (MMRM) on FIS total score data (treatment group, region of enrollment, baseline EDSS stratum, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline-by-visit interaction as factors). All the timepoints from randomization up to Week 48 were included in the model.
Time frame: Baseline (before randomization) and up to Week 152
Baseline adjusted least-squares means at last visit were estimated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model on collected data for FIS total score (treatment group, region of enrollment, baseline EDSS stratum, visit number for the last visit and baseline value as factors).
Time frame: Baseline (before randomization), Week 12, Week 24 and Week 48
SF-36 scale is a generic, self-administered, health-related quality-of-life (QOL) instrument. It is constructed such that the 36 questions represent 8 of the most important health concepts: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health.
Two summary scores are obtained:
Both scores range from 0 to 100 and a high score indicates a more favorable health state.
Baseline adjusted least-squares means at week 48 were estimated using a Mixed-effect model with repeated measures [MMRM] on each summary score data (treatment group, region of enrollment, baseline EDSS stratum, visit, treatment-by-visit interaction, baseline value, and baseline-by-visit interaction as factors). All the timepoints from randomization up to Week 48 were included in the model.
Time frame: Baseline (before randomization) and up to Week 152
Baseline adjusted least-squares means at last visit were estimated using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model on collected data for each summary score (treatment group, region of enrollment, baseline EDSS stratum, visit number for the last visit and baseline value as factors).
Time frame: From first study drug intake up to 112 days after last intake in the core treatment period or up to first intake in the extension treatment period, whichever occurred first
Adverse Events (AE) are any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome, or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study.
Time frame: From first intake of study drug in extension treatment period up to 28 days after the last intake in the extension treatment period
AEs were any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, syndrome, or illness observed by the investigator or reported by the participant during the study.
Time frame: Core treatment period (maximum: 173 weeks) and Extension treatment period (maximum: 174 weeks)
Probability of disability progression since the randomization of the core period was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method on the time to disability progression defined as the time from randomization to first 12 week sustained disability progression [i.e. increase from baseline of at least 1 point in EDSS score (at least 0.5 point for participants with baseline EDSS score >5.5) that persisted for at least 12 weeks].
Participants free of disability progression (no disability progression observed on treatment) were censored at the date of the last on-treatment EDSS evaluation.
Kaplan-Meier method consists in computing probabilities of non occurrence of event at any observed time of event and multiplying successive probabilities for time ≤t by any earlier computed probabilities to estimate the probability of being event free for the amount of time t. Probability of event at time t was 1 minus the probability of being event-free for the amount of time t.
Time frame: Extension treatment period (Maximum: 174 weeks)
ARR was obtained from the total number of confirmed relapses that occurred during the treatment period divided by the sum of treatment durations. A relapse is defined as the appearance of a new clinical sign/symptom or clinical worsening of a previous sign/symptom (one that had been stable for at least 30 days) that persists for a minimum of 24 hours in the absence of fever. Relapse was confirmed by an increase in EDSS score or Functional System scores. To account for the different treatment durations among participants, a Poisson regression model with robust error variance was used (total number of confirmed relapses as response variable; log-transformed treatment duration as "offset" variable; treatment group, region of enrolment and baseline EDSS stratum as covariates).
Time frame: From first study drug intake up to 112 days after last intake in the core treatment period or up to first intake in the extension treatment period, whichever occurred first
PCSA values are abnormal values considered medically important by the Sponsor according to predefined criteria based on literature review.
Hepatic parameters thresholds were defined as follows:
Sanofi
Industry
A Multi-center Double-blind Parallel-group Placebo-controlled Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Teriflunomide in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis
Acronym: TOWER
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03963375
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02511028
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07175792
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Diepenbeek, Belgium
View Trial DetailsNCT07726667
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Gaziantep, Gaz, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details