Travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution
DrugOphthalmic solution without benzalkonium chloride (BAK), containing Polyquad® preservative
Other names: TRAVATAN®
NCT Number: NCT01664039
The purpose of this study is evaluate effects of TRAVATAN® versus LUMIGAN® on intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular surface and inflammatory biomarkers.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ophthalmic solution without benzalkonium chloride (BAK), containing Polyquad® preservative
Other names: TRAVATAN®
Ophthalmic solution containing benzalkonium chloride (BAK)
Other names: LUMIGAN®
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Month 6
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the analysis.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Week 6, Month 3
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in mmHg. A more negative change indicates a greater amount of improvement. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the analysis.
Time frame: Week 6, Month 3, Month 6
IOP (fluid pressure inside the eye) was assessed using Goldmann applanation tonometry and measured in mmHg. Target IOP was defined as ≤ 18 mmHg. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the analysis.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Week 6, Month 3, Month 6
Ocular Hyperaemia (excess of blood in the white of the eyes (sclera)) was graded by the investigator on a 4-point scale where 0=None/Trace, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, and 3=Severe. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the analysis.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Month 3, Month 6
Corneal staining was assessed after ophthalmic dye was instilled in the eye. The upper eyelid was lifted slightly, and the eye was compared to grading panels. Corneal staining was graded on a scale from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe). One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the analysis.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Month 3, Month 6
Conjunctiva staining was assessed after ophthalmic dye was instilled in the eye. The upper eyelid was lifted slightly, and the eye was compared to grading panels. Conjunctiva staining was graded on a scale from 0 (absent) to 5 (severe). One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the analysis.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Month 3, Month 6
The OSDI questionnaire (used to measure vision-related function, ocular symptoms, visual function, and environmental factors that may affect vision) was answered by the subject. Each of the 12 items was scored on a 0-4 Likert scale, where 0 is "None of the time" and 4 is "All of the time." A resultant overall 0-100 score was calculated, with higher scores representing greater disability. A negative number change represents a perceived improvement in ocular health.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 0), Month 3, Month 6
TBUT (the time required for dry spots to appear on the corneal surface after blinking) was assessed by the investigator using slit lamp examination . A longer break up time is a sign of a more stable tear film. A positive number change from baseline indicates improvement. One eye was chosen as the study eye, and only data from the study eye were used for the analysis.
Alcon Research
Industry
Assessing the Efficacy and Tolerability of TRAVATAN® Solution Without BAK, Containing Polyquad® Preservative (Travoprost 0.004%) Versus LUMIGAN® 0.01% Solution With BAK (Bimatoprost 0.01%) in Treatment Naïve Patients With Ocular Hypertension or Open Angle Glaucoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02710916
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Bordeaux, Aquitaine, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06689696
Eye Diseases, GLAUCOMA 1, OPEN ANGLE, D (Disorder)
Fullerton, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06394973
Eye Diseases, Glaucoma
Glendale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07154797
Cataract, Eye Diseases
Santa Rosa de Copán, Honduras
View Trial Details