Sonazoid™
DrugSingle Dose of Sonazoid™ 0.12 µL MB/kg as I.V. injection.
NCT Number: NCT03335566
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® in participants with focal liver lesions (FLLs), by comparing pre-and post-contrast ultrasound examination findings with regard to various aspects of lesion diagnosis including diagnosis as benign versus malignant, specific lesion diagnosis, confidence in diagnosis, and quality of delineation of lesion-related blood vessels (from images obtained during vascular imaging) and detection of lesion presence and quality of delineation of the whole liver (from images obtained during whole liver imaging).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Peking Union Medical College Hospital, East Campus: No.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng, Beijing Municipality, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Participants may be included in the study if they meet all of the following criteria:
Exclusion criteria
Single Dose of Sonazoid™ 0.12 µL MB/kg as I.V. injection.
Single Dose of SonoVue® 2.4 mL as I.V. injection.
Time frame: Pre-administration up to 15 minutes post-administration
Accuracy improvement was calculated by the number of participants with improved diagnoses from the pre-contrast diagnosis to the post-contrast diagnosis divided by the total number of participants, multiplied by 100. Assessments were done by 3 blinded readers. Efficacy population which included all participants who received Sonazoid™ or SonoVue®, for whom pre-contrast & post-contrast images were recorded, & for whom there was a reference standard contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT)/contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) examination or biopsy.
Time frame: Pre-administration up to 15 minutes post-administration
For the cases that can be assessed by the blinded readers both pre- and post-contrast, differences were calculated between the Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® groups in the number of lesions detected during whole-liver imaging (post-contrast minus pre-contrast). The differences were also calculated between the Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® groups in the number of lesions (post-contrast minus reference diagnosis) detected during whole-liver imaging.
Time frame: Pre-administration up to 15 minutes post-administration
Confidence in diagnoses from the pre- and post-contrast ultrasound examinations was evaluated based on 4-point scale: 0-Unknown (cannot make a judgement on level of confidence), 1- Not confident (another examination was required), 2- Probable (Would have more confidence if another diagnostic imaging test such as MRI or CT was performed), 3- Definite (Sufficient confidence to the extent that another diagnostic imaging test such as MRI or CT was unnecessary).
Time frame: Pre-administration up to 15 minutes post-administration
The accuracy improvement was calculated by the number of participants with improved diagnoses from the pre-contrast diagnosis to the post-contrast diagnosis divided by the total number of participants, multiplied by 100. Assessment was performed by 3 blinded readers.
GE Healthcare
Industry
A Phase 3 Multicentre, Randomised, Comparative Study of the Efficacy and Safety of the Ultrasound Contrast Agents Sonazoid™ and SonoVue® in Subjects With Focal Liver Lesions Undergoing Pre- and Post-Contrast Ultrasound Imaging
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.