Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01916967

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Desloratadine (MK-4117) in Japanese Participants With Chronic Urticaria (MK-4117-201)

This is a study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of desloratadine (MK-4117) in Japanese participants with chronic urticaria. The primary hypothesis is that the efficacy of desloratadine 10 mg and 5 mg is superior to placebo as based on the change from Baseline in the sum score of pruritus/itch and rash as assessed by the Investigator at Week 2.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

12 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 3

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic urticaria [rash (erythema, wheal) for more than 1 month without any known cause]
  • Out-patient

Exclusion criteria

  • Stimulation-induced urticaria [physical urticaria (e.g. cold, solar, and heat urticaria), cholinergic urticaria, contact urticaria)]
  • Hypersensitivity to antihistamines or ingredients of a study drug

Treatment and study plan

desloratadine

Drug

Desloratadine 5 mg tablets, given orally, once daily in the evening for 2 weeks

Placebo

Drug

Placebo tablets, given orally, once daily in the evening for 2 weeks

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in the Sum Score of Pruritus/Itch and Rash Assessed by Investigator at Week 2

    Time frame: Baseline Visit and Week 2 Visit

    The Investigator assessed the severity of participant pruritus/itch during the daytime (0=Virtually no itching to 4=Cannot relax because of constant itching) and nighttime (0=Virtually no itching to 4=Cannot sleep because of itching). The score used for pruritus/itch was the higher of the day or night scores (0=Asymptomatic to 4=Severe). The Investigator also assessed the severity of participant rash using the overall rash score (0=No rash to 3=Looks very bad). The sum of the pruritus/itch score (0-4) and rash score (0-3) could range from 0 to 7, with a higher sum score indicating greater severity. The change from Baseline in the sum of the pruritus/itch and overall rash scores at the Week 2 clinic visit was calculated.

  2. Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event (AE)

    Time frame: Up to 4 weeks (Up to 2 weeks after last dose of study drug)

    An AE is any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study drug or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study drug or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of the study drug, is also an AE.

  3. Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an AE

    Time frame: Up to 2 weeks

    An AE is any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study drug or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the study drug or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening (i.e., any clinically significant adverse change in frequency and/or intensity) of a pre-existing condition that is temporally associated with the use of the study drug, is also an AE.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in the Sum Score of Pruritus/Itch and Rash Assessed by Investigator at Day 3 and Week 1

    Time frame: Baseline Visit and Day 3 Visit, Week 1 Visit

    The Investigator assessed the severity of participant pruritus/itch during the daytime (0=Virtually no itching to 4=Cannot relax because of constant itching) and nighttime (0=Virtually no itching to 4=Cannot sleep because of itching). The score used for pruritus/itch was the higher of the day or night scores (0=Asymptomatic to 4=Severe). The Investigator also assessed the severity of participant rash using the overall rash score (0=No rash to 3=Looks very bad). The sum of the pruritus/itch score (0-4) and rash score (0-3) could range from 0 to 7, with a higher sum score indicating greater severity. The changes from Baseline in the sum of the pruritus/itch and overall rash scores at the Day 3 and Week 1 clinic visits were calculated.

  2. Change From Baseline in the Pruritus/Itch Score Assessed by Investigator at Day 3, Week 1 and Week 2

    Time frame: Baseline Visit and Day 3 Visit, Week 1 Visit, Week 2 Visit

    The Investigator assessed the severity of participant pruritus/itch during the daytime and nighttime (0=Asymptomatic to 4=Severe). The sum of the daytime and nighttime pruritus/itch scores could range from 0 to 8, with a higher score indicating greater severity. The changes from Baseline in the sum of the daytime and nighttime scores at the Day 3, Week 1 and Week 2 clinic visits were calculated.

  3. Change From Baseline in the Rash Score Assessed by Investigator at Day 3, Week 1 and Week 2

    Time frame: Baseline Visit and Day 3 Visit, Week 1 Visit, Week 2 Visit

    The Investigator assessed the severity of participant rash (erythema: 0=no symptom to 3=intensive redness, and wheal: 0=no symptom to 3=significant ridge). The sum score for erythema plus wheal could range from 0 to 6, with a higher score indicating greater severity. The changes from Baseline in the sum score for erythema plus wheal at the Day 3, Week 1 and Week 2 clinic visits were calculated.

  4. Number of Participants With a Moderate or Remarkable Improvement in the Global Improvement Rate of Both Pruritus/Itch and Rash (Erythema and Wheal) Assessed by the Investigator at Day 3, Week 1 and Week 2

    Time frame: Baseline Visit and Day 3 Visit, Week 1 Visit, Week 2 Visit

    The global improvement judgment criteria were used to assess overall improvement in pruritus/itch and rash. The Investigator assessed participant global improvement according to 5 grades (Grade 1=Remarkable improvement to Grade 5=Aggravated). The number of participants with moderate or remarkable improvements was calculated. Remarkable improvement (Grade 1) was defined as both pruritus/itch and rash (erythema and wheal) disappeared, or pruritus/itch disappeared and rash (erythema and wheal) was apparently improved. Moderate improvement (Grade 2) was defined as both pruritus/itch and rash (erythema and wheal) were greatly improved.

  5. Change From Baseline in the Pruritus/Itch Score Reported in Participant Diaries at Day 3, Week 1 and Week 2

    Time frame: Baseline Visit and Day 3 Visit, Week 1 Visit, Week 2 Visit

    Participants assessed the severity of their pruritus/itch during the daytime and nighttime (0=asymptomatic to 4=severe). The sum of the daytime and nighttime pruritus/itch scores could range from 0 to 8, with a higher score indicating greater severity. The changes from Baseline in the sum of the daytime and nighttime scores at the Day 3, Week 1 and Week 2 clinic visits were calculated.

  6. Change From Baseline in Pruritus/Itch on a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Reported by Participants at Day 3, Week 1 and Week 2

    Time frame: Baseline Visit and Day 3 Visit, Week 1 Visit, Week 2 Visit

    Participants assessed the degree of their pruritus/itching using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) (0 mm=No itch to 100 mm=Worst imaginable itch), with a higher score indicating more severe itching. The changes from Baseline in participant-assessed pruritus/itch at the Day 3, Week 1 and Week 2 clinic visits were calculated.

  7. Change From Baseline in the Rash Score Reported in Participant Diaries at Day 3, Week 1 and Week 2

    Time frame: Baseline Visit and Day 3 Visit, Week 1 Visit, Week 2 Visit

    Participants assessed the severity of their rash (erythema: 0=no symptom to 3=intensive redness, and wheal: 0=no symptom to 3=significant ridge). The sum score for erythema plus wheal could range from 0 to 6, with a higher score indicating greater severity. The changes from Baseline in the sum score for erythema plus wheal at the Day 3, Week 1 and Week 2 clinic visits were calculated.

  8. Change From Baseline in the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score Reported by Participants at Week 1 and Week 2

    Time frame: Baseline Visit and Week 1 Visit, Week 2 Visit

    The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that measures how much participant skin problems have affected their life. Responses to questions about the effect of participant skin problems on life ranged from 0=Not at all to 3=Very much. The DLQI is broken down into 6 subscales: Symptoms and feelings (range 0-6), Daily activities (range 0-6), Leisure (range 0-6), Work and school (range 0-3), Personal relationships (range 0-6), and Treatment (range 0-3). DLQI subscales were summed to yield the DLQI total score, which could range from 0 to 30. For both DLQI subscales and DLQI total score, a higher score indicated a greater negative impact on life. Participants >=16 years of age completed the DLQI questionnaire about the condition of their skin over the previous week. The changes from Baseline in the DLQI total score at the Week 1 and Week 2 clinic visits were calculated.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Organon and Co

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Phase III Multicentre, Parallel-group, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Clinical Trial to Study the Efficacy and Safety of MK-4117 in Japanese Subjects With Chronic Urticaria.

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Aug 6, 2013
Registry last updated
Jun 18, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.