William H. Foege Hall
Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT05124652
People with leg amputations often experience daily changes in the size (volume) of their residual limb. These daily changes can cause a prosthesis to fit poorly. They can also cause limb problems like pain or skin breakdown. Prosthetic socket systems that accommodate limb volume changes can help address these issues, but they require users to make adjustments throughout the day. The aim of this research is to create a system that will automatically adjust the fit of the socket and create a well-fitting prosthesis for people with leg amputations who experience volume fluctuations when using their prosthesis.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States
Location status: Recruiting
he goal of this research is to determine if an automatic-adjusting prosthetic socket produces better participant outcomes than a manually-adjusting socket or a standard of care control in people with trans-tibial limb amputation. Prosthesis users will wear each socket configuration for 2 weeks. Endpoints will include self-reported comfort, convenience, and fatigue; residual limb health; wear time; activities time; and variability in socket fit. Each condition will be tested separately in a cross-over study design, including a 2-week washout period between the conditions. This aim will use a crossover randomized trial to evaluate the importance of the socket condition The three test conditions will be (1) an automatic-adjusting socket; and (2) a manual-adjusting socket; and (3) a standard of care (adjust socks) control in which socket adjustment is locked. Participants will test each of these three conditions in a random order. There will be a 2-week washout period between test conditions. Participation will begin with an initial sessions where the researchers will evaluate inclusion criteria, collect demographic information, conduct a brief bioimpedance test and thermal imaging test, scan the participant's existing socket and instrument the participant's traditional socket with a monitor to collect activity data for 2 weeks while the investigational prosthesis is fabricated. When the investigational prosthesis is prepared, participants will return to the lab. Self-report questionnaires will be completed, and residual limb health assessed. The participant will be trained on how to operate the socket. The socket will be set to the first condition (order of conditions randomly selected). After using the socket for 3 to 5 days, the researchers will go to the participant's location for a check-in visit. The participant will have an opportunity to ask questions and discuss any issues they are having with the socket. The researchers will make sure the socket is functioning properly. After 2 weeks total, participants will return to the lab and complete self-report questionnaires and have their residual limb health assessed. They will participate in an interview about their experience wearing the socket. After a 2-week washout period, they will conduct the same procedure wearing another socket condition. After another 2-week washout period, they will conduct the same procedure wearing the remaining socket condition.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Participants will test the auto adjusting prosthesis. The prosthesis will be able to move up to 3 panels built into the socket walls to expand or tighten the socket's fit. The auto adjustments will take place during periods of sitting, standing, or walking. Manual adjustments will also be possible either via the researcher controlling the prosthesis or via the key fob developed in the first aim.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Participants in Aim 2 and Aim 3 will test various configurations of the auto adjustment algorithm. Socket comfort score will be asked at various time points during testing, and overall changes in this metric will be calculated from the start and end of session.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Calculated error will be measured through each test session, both in and out of lab.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
Participant's limb fluid volume will be measured during the structured in-lab protocol (Aim 2), and changes will be compared against an initial reference point of activity during which no interventions will take place.
Time frame: Baseline and through study completion, an average of 1 year
Data collected using a standard skin assessment protocol and an IR imaging camera will be used. For IR data, thermal recovery time will be calculated and a difference map of TRT between the beginning and end test condition created
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Socket fit sensor data will be used
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
Durations of walking, standing, sitting, sitting partially doffed, and doffed will be calculated for each day, using socket fit sensor and pin sensor data
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
This will be calculated from socket sensor SFM data
Time frame: Up to 12 weeks
This will be calculated using motor displacement data
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Information from the end of study interview will be tabulated
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Katheryn Allen, CPO
CONTACT
Tessa S Viljamaa
CONTACT
University of Washington
Other
An Automatically-adjusting Prosthetic Socket for People With Transtibial Amputation
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06452186
Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury), Wounds and Injuries
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06419920
Amputation, Lower Limb Amputation Above Knee (Injury)
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07075198
Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury), Prosthesis User
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05425810
Lower Limb Amputation Below Knee (Injury), Pressure Ulcer
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details