Center for Nutraceutical and Dietary Supplement Research
Memphis, Tennessee, 38152, United States
NCT Number: NCT04386226
This study evaluates the impact of two Ambrotose products on immunity, gut health, and associated measures in healthy men and women. Subjects are randomly assigned in double-blind manner to one of five conditions: 1) 2 grams Advanced Ambrotose, 2) 4 grams Advanced Ambrotose, 3) 2 grams Ambrotose LIFE, 4) 4 grams Ambrotose LIFE, or 5) placebo. Subjects ingested their assigned condition daily for eight weeks.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Memphis, Tennessee, 38152, United States
The product Ambrotose, which contains a blend of glyconutrients, has been used by human subjects for several years. It has been shown to enhance immunity, improve cognitive performance, and enhance antioxidant capacity. To date, the treatment with Ambrotose has been very well tolerated, with adverse events limited to "mild" or "self-limiting" or absent altogether.
This study evaluates the impact of two Ambrotose products on immunity, gut health, and associated measures in healthy men and women. Subjects are randomly assigned in double-blind manner to one of five conditions: 1) 2 grams Advanced Ambrotose, 2) 4 grams Ambrotose Advanced, 3) 2 grams Ambrotose LIFE, 4) 4 grams Ambrotose LIFE, or 5) placebo. Subjects ingested their assigned condition daily for eight weeks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Ambrotose LIFE contains aloe vera extract inner leaf gel, arabinogalactin, ghatti gum, glucosamine hydrogen chloride, gum tragacanth, vitamin A, beta carotene, wakame algae extract, rice starch, RiFiber (rice bran), and Modified Citrus Pectin with Sodium Alginate.
Advanced Ambrotose contains aloe vera extract inner leaf gel, arabinogalactan, ghatti gum, glucosamine hydrogen chloride, gum tragacanth, vitamin A, beta carotene, wakame algae extract, and rice starch
Maltodextrin
Time frame: at baseline
A 12-item questionnaire was used to measure functional health and well-being from the subject's point of view during their intervention. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better self-reported health
Time frame: at 4 weeks
A 12-item questionnaire was used to measure functional health and well-being from the subject's point of view during their intervention. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better self-reported health
Time frame: at 8 weeks
A 12-item questionnaire was used to measure functional health and well-being from the subject's point of view during their intervention. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better self-reported health
Time frame: at baseline
The Self-reported psychological general well-being index was used to assess subject's perceived well-being during their intervention. The index goes from 0 (worst possible level of well-being) to 110 (maximum level of well being)
Time frame: at 4 weeks
The Self-reported psychological general well-being index was used to assess subject's perceived well-being during their intervention. The index goes from 0 (worst possible level of well-being) to 110 (maximum level of well being)
Time frame: at 8 weeks
The Self-reported psychological general well-being index was used to assess subject's perceived well-being during their intervention. The index goes from 0 (worst possible level of well-being) to 110 (maximum level of well being)
Time frame: at baseline
A visual analog scale in which the subject was asked to make a mark on a 100-mm scale to indicate how he/she felt in regards to the variable in question during their intervention with 0 being "not at all" and 100 being "the most"
Time frame: at 4 weeks
A visual analog scale in which the subject was asked to make a mark on a 100-mm scale to indicate how he/she felt in regards to the variable in question during their intervention with 0 being "not at all" and 100 being "the most"
Time frame: at 8 weeks
A visual analog scale in which the subject was asked to make a mark on a 100-mm scale to indicate how he/she felt in regards to the variable in question during their intervention with 0 being "not at all" and 100 being "the most"
Time frame: at baseline
We determined the white blood cell numbers for each subject during their intervention.
Time frame: at 4 weeks
We determined the white blood cell numbers for each subject during their intervention.
Time frame: at 8 weeks
We determined the white blood cell numbers for each subject during their intervention.
Time frame: at baseline
IL-10 was measured following blood incubation with Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 4 weeks
IL-10 was measured following blood incubation with Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 8 weeks
IL-10 was measured following blood incubation with Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium for 6 hrs
Time frame: at baseline
IL-6 was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 4 weeks
IL-6 was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 8 weeks
IL-6 was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium for 6 hrs
Time frame: at baseline
IL-1beta was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 4 weeks
IL-1beta was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 8 weeks
IL-1beta was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium for 6 hrs
Time frame: at baseline
TNFalpha was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 4 weeks
TNFalpha was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 8 weeks
TNFalpha was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium for 6 hrs
Time frame: at baseline
IL-10 was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium containing lipopolysaccharide (final concentration 250 ng/mL) for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 4 weeks
IL-10 was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium containing lipopolysaccharide (final concentration 250 ng/mL) for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 8 weeks
IL-10 was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium containing lipopolysaccharide (final concentration 250 ng/mL) for 6 hrs
Time frame: at baseline
IL-6 was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium containing lipopolysaccharide (final concentration 250 ng/mL) for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 4 weeks
IL-6 was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium containing lipopolysaccharide (final concentration 250 ng/mL) for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 8 weeks
IL-6 was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium containing lipopolysaccharide (final concentration 250 ng/mL) for 6 hrs
Time frame: at baseline
IL-1beta was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium containing lipopolysaccharide (final concentration 250 ng/mL) for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 4 weeks
IL-1beta was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium containing lipopolysaccharide (final concentration 250 ng/mL) for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 8 weeks
IL-1beta was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium containing lipopolysaccharide (final concentration 250 ng/mL) for 6 hrs
Time frame: at baseline
TNFalpha was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium containing lipopolysaccharide (final concentration 250 ng/mL) for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 4 weeks
TNFalpha was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium containing lipopolysaccharide (final concentration 250 ng/mL) for 6 hrs
Time frame: at 8 weeks
TNFalpha was measured following blood incubation with RPMI medium containing lipopolysaccharide (final concentration 250 ng/mL) for 6 hrs
Time frame: at baseline
Zonulin from blood serum during the intervention was measured using an ELISA
Time frame: at 4 weeks
Zonulin from blood serum during the intervention was measured using an ELISA
Time frame: at 8 weeks
Zonulin from blood serum during the intervention was measured using an ELISA
Time frame: at baseline
Dietary intake of subjects for 5-days prior to testing days was entered into Food Processor Pro software and analyzed for analyzed for total calories, macro- and micro-nutrient composition
Time frame: at 4 weeks
Dietary intake of subjects for 5-days prior to testing days was entered into Food Processor Pro software and analyzed for analyzed for total calories, macro- and micro-nutrient composition
Time frame: at 8 weeks
Dietary intake of subjects for 5-days prior to testing days was entered into Food Processor Pro software and analyzed for analyzed for total calories, macro- and micro-nutrient composition
University of Memphis
Other
An Assessment of the Glyconutrient Ambrotose™ on Immunity, Gut Health, and Safety in Men and Women: a Placebo-controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06068257
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06702423
Healthy
London, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT07223164
Healthy
Irvine, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05595902
Healthy
Kadıköy, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details