Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02211456

An Assessment of Dual Site Left Ventricular Endocardial Pacing

We are investigating ways to help patients with heart failure, which is caused by damaged hearts which function less well, and cause symptoms of breathlessness, fatigue, lack of energy and swelling.

Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) pacemakers are used to improve the pumping function of the main heart chamber in certain suitable people with heart failure. CRT requires a pacemaker with 2 wires, one placed inside the right heart chamber and one normally placed on the outside of the left heart chamber. These two wires act together to re-time the coordination of the heartbeat, which is known to improve heart function.

The investigators are assessing whether they might be able to improve heart function even more by placing two wires on the inside of the left heart chamber, rather than one around the outside.

The investigators wish to assess whether:

1. Using two wires within the left side of the heart gives a greater increase in heart function than one. 2. It is possible to choose the best spot inside of the heart by measuring the pattern of the heart beat. 3. Is it possible to use a different type of heart monitor placed outside the body instead of a monitor wire inside the heart to assess improvement in heart function? They are investigating this in people with hearts that beat less effectively than normal.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

60 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 7AT, United Kingdom

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
  • Male or Female, aged 60 years or above.
  • Having a suitable Atrial Fibrillation/flutter or Ventricular Tachycardia ablation procedure
  • Evidence of abnormal Left Ventricular structure and function, as shown by Left Ventricular ejection fraction of less than 40%

Exclusion criteria

  • Severe peripheral vascular disease (that would make arterial access more risky)
  • Haemodynamic instability (such that a longer procedure is inadvisable)

Treatment and study plan

Atrial Fibrillation/flutter (AF) or Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) ablation with multi-site pacing protocol

Procedure

Pacing at several endocardial sites in isolation and individually will be performed, with response to this assessed by LV dp/dt max

Primary outcomes

  1. Acute Haemodynamic Response to Dual Left Ventricular Pacing

    Time frame: Mean of multiple recordings in each patient as detailed above

    Acute haemodynamic response to pacing (change in Left Ventricular dP/dt max) between dual site Left Ventricular pacing and biventricular pacing Pacing protocols were performed with a baseline of 30 seconds of right ventricular pacing followed by two 30-second test configurations, and then a further baseline. The pacing configurations were tested, in a randomized order, 3 times each.

    Electrophysiology catheters were positioned at the right ventricular mid septum for baseline pacing, and at the left ventricular septum and at the left ventricular lateral wall, at the site of latest electrical activation i identified from a left ventricular electrical activation map This provided two single-site left ventricular pacing configurations, which could be combined to allow right ventricular and left ventricular lateral (Biventricular pacing) and left ventricular septal and left ventricular lateral (dual left ventricular pacing)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Dual Site Left Endocardial Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy

Acronym: DOUBLE-CRT

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Aug 7, 2014
Registry last updated
Mar 4, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.