UCSD Division of Dermatology
San Diego, California, 92122, United States
NCT Number: NCT01933464
This study is designed to investigate whether topical application of a cromolyn sodium solution is able to decrease the facial redness seen in patients with papulopustular rosacea. Previous work in the lab of Dr. Di Nardo on mice has suggested that cromolyn may be able to have this effect. The study will enroll a total of 10 patients. 5 will randomly be assigned to receive the cromolyn sodium solution, and the other 5 will be randomly assigned to receive the placebo solution. All participants will be instructed to apply their assigned solution twice daily to their face. Patients will return to the clinic 3, 6, and 8 weeks after the distribution of the solutions to measure the efficacy of their assigned solution.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
San Diego, California, 92122, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Subject has used facial topical therapies (OTC drug products or prescription products) for any reason within the prior 28 days
Subject has a known hypersensitivity or allergy to tape or other adhesive materials
Other names: Crolom
Other names: 0.9% sodium chloride, NaCl
Time frame: Baseline
Facial erythema will be measured using the Clinician's Erythema Assessment(CEA) applied to 5 areas of the subject's face (chin, nose, glabella, left cheek, right cheek), as well as using measurements from a colorimeter applied to each of the 5 locations previous mentioned. Each area is rated from 0-4, where 4 represents the most facial erythema (worst outcome). The scores for the 5 locations are summed with a CEA total score scale of 0-20.
Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
We will measure participants' change in facial erythema over the course of the study. The change in facial erythema is measured as a difference between the final (8 weeks after baseline) and baseline visit of the sum of the CEA scores determined from the 5 designated locations (nose, glabella, left cheek, right cheek, and chin). The scale range from -20 to 20. A negative score indicates improvement of facial erythema from baseline to 8 weeks after baseline. A positive score indicates worsening of facial erythema from baseline to 8 weeks after baseline.
Time frame: Baseline
Tape stripping methods were used to isolate matrix metalloproteinase(MMP). Total-MMP activity was determined with total-MMP fluorogenic substrate (5 μM; Enzo Life Sciences), in protein extracts, and subsequently measuring activity (Vmax/sec) at a fluorescence excitation wavelength 328 nm and an emission wavelength of 400 nm in a fluorescence plate reader (Gemini EM microplate spectrofluorometer).
Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks
We will compare subjects' matrix metalloproteinase activity levels at the beginning of the study (baseline) to those at the end of the study (8 weeks after baseline). Tape stripping methods were used to isolate matrix metalloproteinase(MMP). Total-MMP activity was determined with total-MMP fluorogenic substrate (5 μM; Enzo Life Sciences), in protein extracts, and subsequently measuring activity (Vmax/sec) at a fluorescence excitation wavelength 328 nm and an emission wavelength of 400 nm in a fluorescence plate reader (Gemini EM microplate spectrofluorometer).
Time frame: Baseline, and then 3, 6 and 8 weeks after beginning study intervention
Adverse events will be recorded at each visit and their likelihood to the study interventions will be recorded
University of California, San Diego
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05296629
Papulopustular Rosacea, Rosacea
Rogers, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05343455
Papulopustular Rosacea, Rosacea
Santa Monica, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05150587
Papulopustular Rosacea, Rosacea
Yuma, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05838170
Papulopustular Rosacea, Rosacea
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details