The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
David Robinson, MD,MS,MMM
CONTACT
Neomi Sepulveda
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT06070688
The purpose of this study is to evaluate overall changes in patient management and longer-term resource utilization between control and test arms, including (but not limited to) additional work-up (including other diagnostic tests and consults), antimicrobial treatments, disposition decisions and hospital length of stay (LOS)
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Location status: Recruiting
David Robinson, MD,MS,MMM
CONTACT
Neomi Sepulveda
CONTACT
The trial seeks to compare the benefits of adding a diagnostic test that can distinguish the etiology of an acute respiratory illness early in the work-up and management. All adult patients shall be evaluated through the Emergency Department (ED) as an undiagnosed acute reparatory illness (URI). The included patient cohort must present with SIRS criteria and be ill enough to require immediate blood draw and management by the ED. Excluded are any URIs with a predetermined diagnosis or subjects presenting with illness not determined to be a URI as a primary diagnosis. The experimental arm of the study shall have in addition to the standard of care labs and diagnostics, a novel protein array blood test that can distinguish bacterial from viral disease. The control group will not receive these results. The trial seeks to examine the difference in clinical outcomes when a adjunct biomarker than can help the clinician guide more accurate therapy is available early in the diagnostic workup. Benefits are defined in the primary and secondary outcomes as reduced resources expended through reduced laboratory, radiological, blood bank, and pharmaceutical expenditures. Comparative resource utilization costs include changes in hospital and or ED length of stay, lower follow up visits and readmissions, less inpatient and outpatient physician consultants and services called for to manage the patients care, and overall costs. Both primary and secondary outcomes will be used to categorize the costs and resources required to manage the patient. Primary objective is to evaluate overall changes in patient management and longer-term resource utilization between control and test arms, including (but not limited to) additional work-up (including other diagnostic tests and consults), antimicrobial treatments, disposition decisions and hospital length of stay (LOS). The exploratory objective is to evaluate changes between control and test arm in ED LOS, bounce backs (patients returning within 72 hours), work-up costs and the impact of physician seniority.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
for main study population :
Exclusion criteria
for main study population:
Inclusion criteria
for Subgroup:
Patients fulfilling one or more of the following exclusion criteria from the main group are eligible for the subgroup cohort:
one purple top tube of whole blood (2-3 cc) to be used for the MeMed Key® device processing without the need for centrifuge. The MeMed BV® test takes approximately 15 minutes to process and result. After, the sample has been processed and the MeMed BV® test has resulted, the sample of blood will be discarded for each patient enrolled in the study.
Usual care includes diagnostic hematology, chemistry, biomarkers, and culture results along with imaging, consults, and medications, in the treatment of acute viral and/or bacterial illness.
Time frame: from day of admission to emergency department upto about 28 day follow up
Additional diagnostic tests may include serial complete blood count (CBC)s, additional blood cultures, viral cultures and serial basic metabolic panel (BMP) blood bank
Time frame: from day of day of admission to emergency department upto about 28 day follow up
Comparative metric between the experimental and control groups
Time frame: end of study (about 28 days from baseline)
Comparative metric between the experimental and control groups
Time frame: end of study (about 28 days from baseline)
Comparative metric between the experimental and control groups
Time frame: end of study (about 28 days from baseline)
Total costs defined as all costs including lab and diagnostic services, blood bank, pharmaceuticals, nursing, consultants, and all other services listed in the patient's work-up. Comparative metric between the experimental and control groups
Time frame: at time of discharge( from 28 days- 6months from baseline)
Comparative metric between the experimental and control groups
Time frame: at time of discharge from emergency department (upto about 48 hours form admission)
Comparative metric between the experimental and control groups
Time frame: end of study (about 28 days from baseline)
Bounce backs are defined as any return to a health care entity during the 28 day period after discharge from the index visit. Comparative metric between the experimental and control groups
Time frame: at time of discharge from emergency department (upto about 48 hours form admission)
Comparative metric between the experimental and control groups
Time frame: end of study (about 28 days from baseline)
Comparative metric between the experimental and control groups
Time frame: Within 1-3 hours of admission to emergency department
Comparative metric between the experimental and control groups
Time frame: end of study (about 28 days from baseline)
Comparative metric between the experimental and control groups
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
David Robinson, MD,MS,MMM
CONTACT
Neomi Sepulveda
CONTACT
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Other
Does an Adjunct Diagnostic Test That Can Discriminate Bacterial From Viral Etiology Early in the Management of Respiratory Infections Improve Management Accuracy and Quality in the Acute Care Setting?
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05897801
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Attiki, Chaidari, Greece
View Trial DetailsNCT07207291
Bacterial Infections, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
Changsha, Hunan, China
View Trial DetailsNCT02979951
Abscess, Bacteremia
Hall in Tirol, Austria
View Trial DetailsNCT05797246
Communicable Diseases, DNA Virus Infections
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details