University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55414, United States
NCT Number: NCT03222570
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two adaptive treatment strategies (ATSs) for adolescent depression. The ATSs include delivery of an evidence-based psychotherapy (interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed adolescents, IPT-A), systematic symptom monitoring, and an empirically-derived algorithm that specifies whether, when, and how to augment IPT-A. Two hundred depressed adolescents (age 12-18) will be recruited to participate in a 16-week sequential multiple assignment randomized trial conducted in outpatient community mental health clinics. Adolescents will be randomized to the IPT-A ATS condition or the community clinic's usual care (UC). Adolescents in the IPT-A ATS condition who are insufficient responders will be randomized a second time to the addition of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or more intensive IPT-A (delivered twice per week). Research assessments will be administered at baseline and at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 36.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me12 year–18 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55414, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
IPT-A is an evidence-based intervention that aims to decrease depressive symptoms by helping adolescents improve their relationships and interpersonal interactions. It addresses one or more of four interpersonal problem areas: grief, role disputes, role transitions, and interpersonal deficits. The primary treatment techniques in IPT-A include emotion identification/expression, linking interpersonal events to mood, communication analysis, communication skill building, decision analysis, role playing, and assignment of interpersonal experiments (i.e. homework). In clinical trials, depressed adolescents treated with IPT-A demonstrated fewer depressive symptoms and better psychosocial functioning post-treatment than adolescents in control conditions.
Fluoxetine, escitalopram, citalopram, fluvoxamine, or sertraline
Therapists will implement therapy procedures that they usually use and believe to be effective in clinical practice. Therapists will use whatever methods they usually use to make decisions regarding the frequency of therapy sessions and whether to refer the adolescent to start an SSRI
Time frame: 16 weeks
Minimum value: 17 Maximum value: 113 Higher scores indicate worse outcome
Time frame: 16 weeks
Measure of general psychosocial functioning Minimum score: 1 Maximum score: 100 A higher score indicates a better outcome
University of Minnesota
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01829100
Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder
Piscataway, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05927987
Anxiety Disorders, Depressive Disorder
Amsterdam, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT06133309
Depressive Disorder, Mental Disorders
Toulon, Var, France
View Trial DetailsNCT01117753
Anxiety Disorder, Anxiety Disorders
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
View Trial Details