Cardiva Mid-Bore VVCS
DeviceThe device will be used to close all femoral venous access sites at the end of the case, which range from 3 - 4 access sites per patient.
NCT Number: NCT03193021
The objective of the trial is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Cardiva Mid-Bore Venous Vascular Closure System (VVCS) in sealing femoral venous access sites and providing reduced times to ambulation (TTA) compared with manual compression at the completion of catheter-based procedures performed through 6 - 12 Fr introducer sheaths.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Alaska Heart & Vascular, Anchorage, Alaska, United States
A prospective, randomized, controlled multi-center clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the study device in sealing multiple femoral venous access sites and providing reduced times to ambulation compared with manual compression at the completion of catheter-based procedures performed through 6 - 12 Fr introducer sheaths.
Only patients with multiple access sites will be enrolled in order to support the desired indication. Randomization will be stratified to account for patients with varying numbers of access sites in a 1:1 treatment device to control arm ratio to ensure treatment and control arms have the same proportion of access sites/patient, i.e. 3 access sites/patient vs. 4 access sites/patient.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The device will be used to close all femoral venous access sites at the end of the case, which range from 3 - 4 access sites per patient.
Manual compression will be used to achieve hemostasis in all femoral venous access sites when the sheaths are pulled, which range from 3-4 access sites per patient.
Time frame: Post-procedure, usually within 6 hours
Elapsed time between removal of the final Mid-Bore VVCS device (treatment arm) or removal of final sheath (control arm) and when subject stands and walks 20 feet without evidence of venous re-bleeding from the femoral access site.
Time frame: 30 +/- 7 days post-procedure
Rate of combined major venous access site closure-related complications. The method used to determine what would be considered "major" venous access site closure-related complications are those complications which were attributed directly to the closure method used for the access site at the end of the procedure.
Time frame: 30 +/- 7 days post-procedure
Rate of combined minor venous access site closure-related complications. The method used to determine what would be considered "minor" venous access site closure-related complications are those complications which were attributed directly to the closure method used for the access site at the end of the procedure.
Time frame: Prior to hospital discharge, usually within 24 hours
Elapsed time between removal of the final Mid-Bore VVCS device (treatment arm) or removal of final sheath (control arm) and when subject is eligible for discharge based solely on assessment of the access site
Time frame: Post-procedure, usually within 3 hours
Elapsed time between removal of the final Mid-Bore VVCS device (treatment arm) or removal of final sheath (control arm) and first observed and confirmed venous hemostasis, for each access site.
Time frame: Prior to hospital discharge, usually within 24 hours
Elapsed time between removal of the final Mid-Bore VVCS device (treatment arm) or removal of final sheath (control arm) and when subject is discharged
Time frame: Post-procedure, usually within 6 hours
Elapsed time between removal of the last procedural device for the index procedure and removal of the first Mid-Bore VVCS device (treatment arm) or removal of first sheath (control arm)
Time frame: Post-procedure, usually within 6 hours
Elapsed time between removal of the last procedural device for the index procedure and when the subject is able to successfully ambulate
Time frame: 30 +/- 7 days post-procedure
Attainment of final hemostasis at all venous access sites and freedom from major venous access site closure-related complications
Time frame: Procedural, usually within 15 minutes of enrollment
Ability to deploy the delivery system, deliver the collagen, and achieve hemostasis with the Mid-Bore VVCS (per access site analysis, treatment arm only)
Cardiva Medical, Inc.
Industry
AMBULATE: Multi-center, RCT for Safety & Efficacy of Cardiva Mid-Bore Venous VCS v. Manual Compression to Close Femoral Venotomies After Catheter-based Interventions Via 6-12F ID Sheaths With Single or Multiple Access Sites Per Limb
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06634030
Surgical Wound, Wound Healing
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07601919
Surgical Wound, Wounds and Injuries
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT03452072
Surgical Wound, Wound Heal
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06073678
Surgical Wound, Wounds and Injuries
Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil
View Trial Details