Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06006208

AMBU Bag Manual Ventilation vs. Transport Ventilator Mechanical Ventilation for Transport

This is a clinical trial to compare the oxygenation and ventilation performance between manual ventilation and mechanical ventilation when transporting cardiac patients to the ICU.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Thomas Jefferson University

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19107, United States

About this study

Following cardiac surgery, patients often require ventilation during transport to the intensive care unit (ICU). Most of the time, manual ventilation using an AMBU bag (AMBU INC. MD, USA) is utilized, but some patients need mechanical ventilation due to concern for oxygenation, ventilation, and hemodynamics. The indication to choose mechanical ventilation over manual ventilation is determined on a case-by-case basis, mostly based on providers' experiences or surgical request, because currently there is no clear clinical evidence behind that. With this clinical study, the investigators intend to build up clinical evidence by comparing oxygenation, ventilation, hemodynamics, and cardiac functions between two arms: manual ventilation using AMBU bag arm and mechanical ventilation using a transport ventilator.

Objective: In this study, the investigators plan to compare the effects of transport ventilators (Hamilton C1: Bodaduz, Schweiz) and AMBU bag manual ventilation on oxygenation, ventilation, biventricular function, and hemodynamics. This is a two-arm study.

  • To assess pre and post transport PaO2/FiO2 (P/F ratio), PaCO2, biventricular function, and mean artery pressure in the AMBU bag and Hamilton transport ventilator groups. The investigators hypothesize that using the Hamilton transport ventilator will show a smaller change in P/F ratio, mean artery blood pressures and biventricular function compared to the AMBU bag group. If true, these findings would support using the Hamilton ventilator for transport in appropriate surgical patients.
  • To perform "in-vitro" flow analysis using a flow analyzer analyzer (CITREX H5:

Buchs, Schweiz) and lung simulator (SmartLung 2000: Buchs, Schweiz) to measure the accuracy of the ventilations of Hamilton C1 ventilator and AMBU bag manual ventilation on different resistance and compliance settings of the lung simulator

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Over 18 years old (any gender or race)
  • Cardiac surgery
  • Require postoperative mechanical ventilation and care in the ICU.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients' refusal
  • Extubation in OR
  • On mechanical circulatory support
  • Requirement for postoperative therapy with inhaled pulmonary vasodilators (epoprostenol (FLOLAN), inhaled nitric oxide, etc.)
  • Severe RV dysfunction with preoperative echocardiography
  • Contraindication to TEE and pulmonary artery catheter.

Treatment and study plan

Hamilton C1 ventilator during transport to the ICU

Device

Instead of AMBU bag manual ventilation during transport to the ICU, intervention is using Hamilton C1 ventilator during transport to the ICU

Primary outcomes

  1. The % Change in Mean Artery Blood Pressure

    Time frame: Pre-transport hemodynamic values were averaged from the final three readings (taken at 1-min intervals) before switching to the transport monitor, and post-transport readings were recorded immediately after transfer to the ICU monitor.

    The % change in mean artery blood pressure before and after the transport to the ICU.

    i.e. (post-transport measurement - pre-transport measurement)/pre-transport measurement x100 (%)

Secondary outcomes

  1. The % Changes in PaO2/FiO2 (P/F Ratio)

    Time frame: First aortic blood gas analysis Immediately before transport to ICU till the second arterial blood gas analysis after dropping off the patient at ICU; approximately 30 minutes after the first visual assessment.

    The % changes in PaO2/FiO2 (P/F ratio) pre and post transport to ICU. P/F ratio will be assessed on arterial blood gas immediately before and after the transport to ICU, at the same time as the investigators do echocardiographic assessment as described above.

    i.e. (post-transport measurement - pre-transport measurement)/pre-transport measurement x100 (%)

  2. The % Change in PaCO2

    Time frame: First aortic blood gas analysis Immediately before transport to ICU till the second arterial blood gas analysis after dropping off the patient at ICU; approximately 30 minutes after the first visual assessment.

    The % changes in PaCO2 pre and post transport to ICU. PaCO2 will be assessed on arterial blood gas immediately before and after the transport to ICU, at the same time as the investigators do echocardiographic assessment as described above.

    i.e. (post-transport measurement - pre-transport measurement)/pre-transport measurement x100 (%)

  3. The Visual Scale in Changes in Left Ventricular Function

    Time frame: First visual assessment of left ventricular function Immediately before transport to ICU till the second visual assessment after dropping off the patient at ICU; approximately 30 minutes after the first visual assessment.

    Within-group and between-group changes in visual assessment of left ventricular function parameters before and after transport (1: severe hypokinetic, 2: moderate hypokinetic, 3: mild hypokinetic, 4: normal, 5: hyperdynamic)

  4. The Visual Scale in Changes in Right Ventricular Function

    Time frame: First visual assessment of right ventricular function Immediately before transport to ICU till the second visual assessment after dropping off the patient at ICU; approximately 30 minutes after the first visual assessment.

    Within-group and between-group changes in visual assessment of right ventricular cardiac function parameters before and after transport (1: severe hypokinetic, 2: moderate hypokinetic, 3: mild hypokinetic, 4: normal, 5: hyperdynamic)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Thomas Jefferson University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Ventilation During Intensive Care Unit Transport After Cardiac Surgeries; When Should we Use a Ventilator?

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Aug 23, 2023
Registry last updated
Feb 3, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.