U.O. Odontostomatologia e Chirurgia del Cavo Orale
Pisa, Italy, 56126
NCT Number: NCT06970184
Observational, prospective study conducted on patients requiring tooth extractions followed by ARP and subsequent implant placement.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Pisa, Italy, 56126
The primary aim of this study is to compare the histomorphometric characteristics of two different formulations of CCPB used for ARP, and the secondary aim is to evaluate and compare clinical and aesthetic outcomes of dental implants placed in augmented sites.
Patients requiring the extraction of an hopeless tooth followed by ARP and subsequent implant placement are considered potentially eligible for the study.
At T0, Tooth extractions are performed trying to reduce the surgical trauma as possible. ARP is performed with 2 different combinations of a cortico-cancellous porcine bone with a thermogel (50:50 ratio, hand-mixed or 80:20 ratio, pre-mixed).
After 4 months of healing, patients undergo a radiographic examination before implant placement.
A T1, Implant site preparation is carried out using a trephine bur (to remove a core biopsy of the bone) followed by conventional osteotomy drills, and bone-level implants are placed. Bone samples are analyzed to evaluate new bone formation, presence of residual graft particles and marrow spaces.
Three months after placement, all implants are rehabilitated with screw-retained prosthetic crowns (T2).
Follow up is scheduled 1 year after prosthetic loading (T3).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
alveolar ridge preservation performed after tooth extraction
Implant placement
Time frame: T1= 4 months following tooth extraction + ARP
The primary outcome is evaluated in terms of Percentages of newly formed bone (NB) in the in the histological samples.
Time frame: T1= 4 months following tooth extraction + ARP
The primary outcome is evaluated in terms of Percentages of marrow spaces (MS) in the histological samples
Time frame: T1= 4 months following tooth extraction + ARP
The primary outcome is evaluated in terms of Percentages of marrow spaces (MS) in the histological samples
Time frame: T1= 4 months following tooth extraction + ARP
Radiographic marginal bone level (measured in millimeters) taken at the mesial and distal aspect of the implant as the distance from the implant-abutment interface to the most apical bone-implant contact.
Time frame: T2= 3 months following implant placement
Radiographic marginal bone level (measured in millimeters) taken at the mesial and distal aspect of the implant as the distance from the implant-abutment interface to the most apical bone-implant contact.
Time frame: T3= 1-year follow-up
Radiographic marginal bone level (measured in millimeters) taken at the mesial and distal aspect of the implant as the distance from the implant-abutment interface to the most apical bone-implant contact.
Time frame: Day 1 = tooth extraction + ARP
Maximum post-extractive buccal/lingual distance (measured in millimeters) of the socket evaluated with a UNC periodontal probe
Time frame: T1= 4 months following tooth extraction + ARP
Maximum alveolar crest width at implant placement (measured in millimeters) evaluated with a UNC periodontal probe
Time frame: Day 1 = tooth extraction + ARP
Mean distance (measured in millimeters) between mesial and distal reference points and the alveolar crest measured with a UNC periodontal probe
Time frame: T1= 4 months following tooth extraction + ARP
Mean distance (measured in millimeters) between mesial and distal reference points and the alveolar crest measured with a UNC periodontal probe
Time frame: T2= 3 months following implant placement
evaluated with the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) according to seven variables: mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft tissue level, soft tissue contour, alveolar ridge deficiency, soft tissue color, and soft tissue texture. Each variable could have a score ranging between 0 to 2; the total PES has a maximum level of 14
Time frame: T3= 1-year follow-up
evaluated with the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) according to seven variables: mesial papilla, distal papilla, soft tissue level, soft tissue contour, alveolar ridge deficiency, soft tissue color, and soft tissue texture. Each variable could have a score ranging between 0 to 2; the total PES has a maximum level of 14
University of Pisa
Other
Alveolar Ridge Preservation With Cortico-cancellous Collagenic Porcine Bone
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07638358
Alveolar Ridge Preservation, Tooth Extraction Site Healing
Caparica, Monte Da Caparica, Portugal
View Trial DetailsNCT07589751
Alveolar Ridge Preservation, Tooth Extraction Site Healing
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
View Trial DetailsNCT07607314
Alveolar Ridge Preservation, Chronic Periapical Periodontitis
Dammam, Saudi Arabia
View Trial DetailsNCT07394738
Alveolar Ridge Preservation, Bone Regeneration
Malatya, Battalgazi-Malatya, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details