Allograft
OtherCorticocancellous mineralized allograft
NCT Number: NCT04321109
Seven Patients who need implants to replace non-restorable teeth in the esthetic zone.
Intervention Group (1): Seven extraction sockets that received the collagen matrix (Collagen cone) for alveolar ridge preservation.
Comparison Group (2): Seven extraction sockets that were treated with mineralized cortico-cancellous bone allograft for alveolar ridge preservation.
Outcome
1. Alveolar ridge preservation both in height and in width to improve implant success rate
* The height of alveolar ridge was assessed clinically using a periodontal probe. * The width of the alveolar ridge was measured after three months after extraction using a caliper clamp. * Changes in the width and height of alveolar bone were evaluated in merged axial and sagittal views using the I-CAT superimposition system (CBCT).
2- Evaluation of newly formed bone quality was performed by histological examination and histomorphometric analysis.
3- Immuno-histochemical staining was done using polyclonal antibody to detect (BMP-2) marker of bone formation
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me20 year–40 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The aim of the present study was to compare three months post-extraction augmented ridge using collagen matrix versus mineralized cortico-cancellous bone allograft. This comparison was done clinically, histologically, immunohisto-chemically and radiologically.
A core biopsy was taken three months after tooth extraction which has undergone histomorphometric and immunohistochemical analysis; implant placement was also done at the same time.
In the present study, it was found that the mean bone height decreased with a higher percent in collagen matrix group than mineralized cortico-cancellous bone allograft group with a non significant difference between both groups.
In addition, this study showed that the mean bone width decreased more in collagen matrix group than mineralized cortico-cancellous bone allograft group with a non significant difference between them.
Moreover, in the present study, Histomorphometric analysis revealed new bone trabeculae formation with osteoblastic rimming, the surrounding fibrous tissue is cellular and remnants of the graft materials was detected , with no marked difference in the amount of newly formed bone between two groups .
Regarding immunohistochemical analysis in both groups, the osteoblasts in the fibrous tissue and osteocytes in newly formed bone are showing nuclear staining, with increasing area of immunopositive cells in mineralized cortico-cancellous bone allograft group.
Radiographically, CBCT superimposition revealed that a greater percent decrease in bone height was denoted in collagen matrix than mineralized cortico-cancellous bone allograft group with a significant difference between both groups after 3 and 6 months.
Accordingly bone width showed a higher decrease in mineralized cortico-cancellous bone allograft group than Collagen matrix group with a non significant difference between both groups after 3 and 6 months.
Finally, bone density showed a greater decrease in Collagen matrix group than mineralized cortico-cancellous bone allograft group with a non significant difference after 3 months but significant difference was found after 6 months between both groups.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Corticocancellous mineralized allograft
Collagen matrix
Time frame: change from baseline at 12 weeks
Dimensional changes in alveolar ridge after alveolar ridge preservation both clinically and radiographically
Time frame: detected at 12 weeks
Bone morphogenic protein -2 immunopositive cells in immunostained sections
Yasmine Fouad
Other
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Collagen Material and Allograft: A Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07571863
Alveolar Ridge Preservation, Socket Preservation
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07565558
Allograft, Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Bytom, Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT07324083
Alveolar Ridge Preservation, Immediate Implant Loading
Al Mansurah, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07171866
Alveolar Ridge Preservation, Implant Dentistry
Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt
View Trial Details