Well-controlled diabetic (WC)
DeviceEach individual will receive one implant (4.1 Titanium-Zirconia, hydrophilic-Roxolid), that will be placed in the posterior mandible.
NCT Number: NCT02395315
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a very prevalent metabolic disorder in the adult population affecting roughly 17.7 million people in the US alone. The harmful effect of DM on implant integration and survival has been attributed to vascular complications in the alveolar bone that lead to compromised blood supply and decreased bone density. Nonetheless, the specific detrimental effects of DM in the alveolar bone have not been investigated in humans.
People with DM generally lose more teeth than persons without diabetes, but implant placement in not well controlled diabetics is not routinely performed due to the lack of relevant evidence and the risk for implant failure and associated complications. Chemically modified, micro-rough, hydrophilic (SLActive®) titanium implant surfaces have been shown to accelerate osseointegration of dental implants placed in diabetic animals. It has been hypothesized that this enhanced biologic response is due to the biocompatibility and hydrophilicity of the surface that actively attracts blood and is populated by progenitor cells, and growth factors that improve stromal cell differentiation.
Hypotheses:
It is hypothesized that hyperglycemia results in compromised vascularity in the mandible. Thus, hydrophilic TiZr implant surfaces (Roxolid®) that actively attract fluids and possess excellent osteoconductive properties, may enhance peri-implant bone response in diabetic patients to levels comparable to well-controlled diabetics.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–85 year
All sexes
Observational
University of Minnesota Advanced Education in Periodontology, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
A high level of evidence exists to support the placement of implants in type 2 diabetics with glucosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels within the normoglycemic range. Less information is available for the integration of implants placed in diabetics that cannot achieve good glycemic control, who may represent up to 50% of the diabetic patient population. Recent data from the medical literature have unveiled the deleterious effect of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) on the bone marrow. The microvascular alterations of DM on skeletal bones lead to microangiopathy, reduced blood flow and fatty degeneration in the bone marrow. Nascent theories that are founded upon the observation of increased levels of soluble osteoprotegerin (OPG) levels in uncontrolled DM implicate disruption of RANKL/OPG signaling as a potential pathway for the diabetes- related bone alterations. Nonetheless, no data is currently available on the pathophysiology of the alveolar bone in patients with DM.
It is hypothesized that 1) hyperglycemia results in compromised vascularity in the mandible, thus 2) hydrophilic TiZr implant surfaces (Roxolid®) that actively attract fluids and possess excellent osteoconductive properties, may enhance peri-implant bone response in not well-controlled diabetics (NCD) to levels comparable to well-controlled diabetics (WCD). We further hypothesize that the expected decreased RANKL/OPG ratio in NCD versus WCD will not recover during post-surgery bone remodeling. To assess our hypotheses, we will recruit n=21 type II WCD (HbA1c≤7.0%) and n=21 type II NCD (7.5%<HbA1c≤10%) seeking implant placement in the mandible. We will collect intra-operative bone specimens at baseline and blood samples to assess bone structural alterations (H&E stain), microvascular density (immunohistochemistry), bound RANKL/OPG (immunohistochemistry) and serum RANKL/OPG (ELISA). Implant integration and success will be assessed at 3, 6, 12 and 36-months.
Obtained results will give dental researchers new insights into the pathophysiology of the alveolar bone in diabetes and will provide information on the safety and efficacy of implant placement in type II diabetic patients that cannot control their glycemic status. Collectively, this work will pave the way for identifying efficacious implant treatment modalities for persons that live with type II diabetes to alleviate the morbidity associated with tooth loss in this susceptible population group.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Adult patients aged 18-85 years with diagnosed DM2.
History of DM2 for at least two years prior to enrollment.
At least one edentulous site in the canine or posterior mandible regions.
HbA1c >7.5% & <10% for enrollment in the test group.
HbA1c ≤ 7.0% for enrollment in the control group.
Available for follow up at 12 months.
Exclusion criteria
Mandibular incisor sites that will not allow bone core retrieval due to limited alveolar bone width (ridge width <5mm, height <10mm) as confirmed by pre-operative CBCT.
Smokers: current, or ex-smokers with <2 years cessation.
Active periodontal disease.
Medications that affect bone healing (e.g. bisphosphonates or chronic steroids).
Patients who are carriers of transmissible disease(s) that may unnecessarily expose laboratory personnel to risks.
Participants with a physician-diagnosed osteoporosis (Z-score ≤ -2).
Females during pregnancy or lactation and females that plan to become pregnant in the following year.
Patients that will not agree to participate in this study or sign the consent form.
Each individual will receive one implant (4.1 Titanium-Zirconia, hydrophilic-Roxolid), that will be placed in the posterior mandible.
Each individual will receive one implant (4.1 Titanium-Zirconia, hydrophilic-Roxolid), that will be placed in the posterior mandible.
Time frame: Baseline (intra-operative bone sample)
The difference between alveolar bone vascularity of well-controlled and not well-controlled diabetic patients by immunostaining
Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks
A comparison between RANK-L to OPG ratio to determine the state of bone remodeling in each cohort.
Time frame: Baseline (intra-operative bone sample)
Comparison of bone mineralization between the two cohorts via histomorphometric measurement of vital bone percentage at the time of implant surgery
Time frame: Time of implant surgery-36 months
Recording of the ISQ values (Osstel) and maximum insertion torque during implant placement as surrogates for primary implant stability.
Time frame: 3 years
Implant survival and success assessment at 3-months, 6-months, 1-year and 3-years post-loading
Time frame: 3 years
Assessment of marginal bone level maintenance around the implants at 3-months, 6-months, 1-year and 3-years post-loading. Periapical radiographs will be obtained using a paralleling technique with customized film holders will be obtained at baseline
Time frame: 3 months
Short-term soft tissue and implant-related complications associated with implant surgery recorded at every post-op visit up to 3-months post-surgery
University of Minnesota
Other
Placement of Hydrophilic TiZr Implants to Enhance Implant Survival in Diabetic Patients: A Prospective, Two-arm, Cohort Study
Acronym: ABCD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00038727
Body Weight, CVD
Rockville, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06029517
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01934660
Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiovascular Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07728162
Diabetes Mellitus, Disease Attributes
Bolu, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details