Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02395315

Alveolar Bone Changes in Diabetes (ABCD) Study

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a very prevalent metabolic disorder in the adult population affecting roughly 17.7 million people in the US alone. The harmful effect of DM on implant integration and survival has been attributed to vascular complications in the alveolar bone that lead to compromised blood supply and decreased bone density. Nonetheless, the specific detrimental effects of DM in the alveolar bone have not been investigated in humans.

People with DM generally lose more teeth than persons without diabetes, but implant placement in not well controlled diabetics is not routinely performed due to the lack of relevant evidence and the risk for implant failure and associated complications. Chemically modified, micro-rough, hydrophilic (SLActive®) titanium implant surfaces have been shown to accelerate osseointegration of dental implants placed in diabetic animals. It has been hypothesized that this enhanced biologic response is due to the biocompatibility and hydrophilicity of the surface that actively attracts blood and is populated by progenitor cells, and growth factors that improve stromal cell differentiation.

Hypotheses:

It is hypothesized that hyperglycemia results in compromised vascularity in the mandible. Thus, hydrophilic TiZr implant surfaces (Roxolid®) that actively attract fluids and possess excellent osteoconductive properties, may enhance peri-implant bone response in diabetic patients to levels comparable to well-controlled diabetics.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of Minnesota Advanced Education in Periodontology, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

A high level of evidence exists to support the placement of implants in type 2 diabetics with glucosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels within the normoglycemic range. Less information is available for the integration of implants placed in diabetics that cannot achieve good glycemic control, who may represent up to 50% of the diabetic patient population. Recent data from the medical literature have unveiled the deleterious effect of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) on the bone marrow. The microvascular alterations of DM on skeletal bones lead to microangiopathy, reduced blood flow and fatty degeneration in the bone marrow. Nascent theories that are founded upon the observation of increased levels of soluble osteoprotegerin (OPG) levels in uncontrolled DM implicate disruption of RANKL/OPG signaling as a potential pathway for the diabetes- related bone alterations. Nonetheless, no data is currently available on the pathophysiology of the alveolar bone in patients with DM.

It is hypothesized that 1) hyperglycemia results in compromised vascularity in the mandible, thus 2) hydrophilic TiZr implant surfaces (Roxolid®) that actively attract fluids and possess excellent osteoconductive properties, may enhance peri-implant bone response in not well-controlled diabetics (NCD) to levels comparable to well-controlled diabetics (WCD). We further hypothesize that the expected decreased RANKL/OPG ratio in NCD versus WCD will not recover during post-surgery bone remodeling. To assess our hypotheses, we will recruit n=21 type II WCD (HbA1c≤7.0%) and n=21 type II NCD (7.5%<HbA1c≤10%) seeking implant placement in the mandible. We will collect intra-operative bone specimens at baseline and blood samples to assess bone structural alterations (H&E stain), microvascular density (immunohistochemistry), bound RANKL/OPG (immunohistochemistry) and serum RANKL/OPG (ELISA). Implant integration and success will be assessed at 3, 6, 12 and 36-months.

Obtained results will give dental researchers new insights into the pathophysiology of the alveolar bone in diabetes and will provide information on the safety and efficacy of implant placement in type II diabetic patients that cannot control their glycemic status. Collectively, this work will pave the way for identifying efficacious implant treatment modalities for persons that live with type II diabetes to alleviate the morbidity associated with tooth loss in this susceptible population group.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Adult patients aged 18-85 years with diagnosed DM2.

History of DM2 for at least two years prior to enrollment.

At least one edentulous site in the canine or posterior mandible regions.

HbA1c >7.5% & <10% for enrollment in the test group.

HbA1c ≤ 7.0% for enrollment in the control group.

Available for follow up at 12 months.

Exclusion criteria

Mandibular incisor sites that will not allow bone core retrieval due to limited alveolar bone width (ridge width <5mm, height <10mm) as confirmed by pre-operative CBCT.

Smokers: current, or ex-smokers with <2 years cessation.

Active periodontal disease.

Medications that affect bone healing (e.g. bisphosphonates or chronic steroids).

Patients who are carriers of transmissible disease(s) that may unnecessarily expose laboratory personnel to risks.

Participants with a physician-diagnosed osteoporosis (Z-score ≤ -2).

Females during pregnancy or lactation and females that plan to become pregnant in the following year.

Patients that will not agree to participate in this study or sign the consent form.

Treatment and study plan

Well-controlled diabetic (WC)

Device

Each individual will receive one implant (4.1 Titanium-Zirconia, hydrophilic-Roxolid), that will be placed in the posterior mandible.

Poorly controlled diabetics (PC)

Device

Each individual will receive one implant (4.1 Titanium-Zirconia, hydrophilic-Roxolid), that will be placed in the posterior mandible.

Primary outcomes

  1. Differences in alveolar bone vascularity among well-controlled and not well-controlled diabetic patients.

    Time frame: Baseline (intra-operative bone sample)

    The difference between alveolar bone vascularity of well-controlled and not well-controlled diabetic patients by immunostaining

Secondary outcomes

  1. RANK-L to OPG ratio

    Time frame: Baseline to 8 weeks

    A comparison between RANK-L to OPG ratio to determine the state of bone remodeling in each cohort.

Other outcomes

  1. Differences in alveolar bone mineralization

    Time frame: Baseline (intra-operative bone sample)

    Comparison of bone mineralization between the two cohorts via histomorphometric measurement of vital bone percentage at the time of implant surgery

  2. ISQ values as a surrogate for implant stability

    Time frame: Time of implant surgery-36 months

    Recording of the ISQ values (Osstel) and maximum insertion torque during implant placement as surrogates for primary implant stability.

  3. Implant survival and success assessment at 3-months, 6-months, 1-year and 3-years post-loading

    Time frame: 3 years

    Implant survival and success assessment at 3-months, 6-months, 1-year and 3-years post-loading

  4. Marginal bone level assessment

    Time frame: 3 years

    Assessment of marginal bone level maintenance around the implants at 3-months, 6-months, 1-year and 3-years post-loading. Periapical radiographs will be obtained using a paralleling technique with customized film holders will be obtained at baseline

  5. Implant surgery-related complications

    Time frame: 3 months

    Short-term soft tissue and implant-related complications associated with implant surgery recorded at every post-op visit up to 3-months post-surgery

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Minnesota

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Washington

Registry information

Official study title

Placement of Hydrophilic TiZr Implants to Enhance Implant Survival in Diabetic Patients: A Prospective, Two-arm, Cohort Study

Acronym: ABCD

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2021
First posted
Mar 23, 2015
Registry last updated
Mar 2, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.