Azacitidine
DrugAzacitidine is administered subcutaneously
Total of 18 cycles on treatment or early discontinuation.
NCT Number: NCT00102687
The purpose of this study is to determine if azacitidine, combined with Best Supportive Care (BSC), is effective in treating myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) when given according to a different doses and dosing schedules.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Comprehensive Blood and Cancer Center, Research Department, Bakersfield, California, United States
Comparison/Control Interventions: The comparison is azacitidine at different doses and schedules.
Duration of Intervention: Treatment lasted for a maximum of 18 cycles, which is up to 24 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Azacitidine is administered subcutaneously
Total of 18 cycles on treatment or early discontinuation.
Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months
Participant counts by best hematological response; complete remission(CR) is better than a partial remission(PR) which is better than stable disease(SD).
Investigator determined responses followed IWG 2000 criteria for MDS CR: repeat bone marrow show <5% myeloblasts, and peripheral blood evaluations lasting >=2 months of hemoglobin(>110 g/L), neutrophils(>=1.5x10^9/L), platelets(>=100x10^9/L), blasts (0%) and no dysplasia PR is the same as CR for peripheral blood: bone marrow shows blasts decrease by >=50% or a less advanced FAB classification from pretreatment (see Population Descrip)
Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months
IWG 2000 Criteria: Pretreatment=hemoglobin <110g/L or RBC transfusion-dependence, platelet count <100x10^9/L or platelet transfusion dependence, absolute neutrophil count <1.5x10^9/L.
Erythroid response: Major->20g/L increase in hemoglobin or transfusion independence. Minor- 10-20g/L increase in hemoglobin or >=50% decrease in transfusion requirements.
Platelet response: Major-absolute increase of platelet count by >=30x10^9/L or platelet transfusion independence. Minor->=50% increase in platelet count with net increase >10x10^9/L but <30x10^9/L.
(continued in Population Description)
Time frame: Day 1 (randomization) to 6 months
Number of participants whose best hematological outcome was either complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR) (as determined by the investigator), or any hematologic improvement (based on the IWG 2000 criteria for MDS). See previous outcomes for detailed definitions.
Time frame: 24 months
Hematologic response during the maintenance period are compared to the response in the initial study period. Initial response could have been a complete remission, a partial remission, stable disease or a hematologic improvement. Maintenance period best response is after randomization to a maintenance arm for those randomized, and is after the start of cycle 7 for those remaining on initial period treatment throughout the study.
Time frame: Day 1 (randomization)
The median values for hemoglobin based on blood tests performed on study day 1 (prior to study treatment) constitute a baseline measure for hemoglobin. Baseline values are used to compare to values following treatment.
Time frame: 6 months
The difference between hemoglobin values at the end of the initial study period minus the hemoglobin values at baseline.
Time frame: 24 months
The difference between hemoglobin values at the end of the maintenance study period minus the hemoglobin values at baseline.
Time frame: Day 1 (randomization)
The median values for platelets based on blood tests performed on study day 1 (prior to study treatment) constitute a baseline measure for platelets. Baseline values are used to compare to values following treatment.
Time frame: 6 months
The difference between platelet values at the end of the initial study period minus the platelet values at baseline.
Time frame: 24 months
The difference between platelet values at the end of the maintenance study period minus the platelet values at baseline.
Time frame: Day 1 (randomization)
The median values for ANC based on blood tests performed on study day 1 (prior to study treatment) constitute a baseline measure for ANC. Baseline values are used to compare to values following treatment.
Time frame: 6 months
The difference between ANC values at the end of the initial study period minus the ANC values at baseline.
Time frame: 24 months
The difference between ANC values at the end of the maintenance study period minus the ANC values at baseline.
Time frame: 6 months
Shift table comparing the RBC transfusion status of patients at the end of the initial study period to the transfusion status at baseline.
Time frame: 6 months
Shift table comparing the platelet transfusion status of patients at the end of the initial study period to the transfusion status at baseline.
Time frame: 24 months
Shift table comparing the RBC transfusion status of patients at the end of the maintenance study period to the transfusion status at baseline.
Time frame: 24 months
Shift table comparing the platelet transfusion status of patients at the end of the maintenance study period to the transfusion status at baseline.
Time frame: 6 months
Baseline uses the average number of infections requiring IV antibiotic treatment from the 28 days prior to and including the day of first dose to an initial treatment arm. Initial study period values total the number of infections requiring IV antibiotic treatment divided by the number of treatment cycles (each cycle is approximately one month).
Time frame: 24 months
Baseline uses the average number of infections requiring IV antibiotic treatment from the 28 days prior to and including the day of first dose to an initial treatment arm. Maintenance study period values total the number of infections requiring IV antibiotic treatment divided by the number of treatment cycles (each cycle is approximately one month).
Celgene
Industry
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Three Alternative Dosing Regimens of Subcutaneous Azacitidine Plus Best Supportive Care for the Treatment of Myelodysplastic Syndromes
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05024994
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Bone Marrow Diseases
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00534430
Anemia, Anemia, Refractory
View Trial DetailsNCT03932643
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Bone Marrow Diseases
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03434730
Acute Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
New York, United States
View Trial Details