Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University
Bangkok, Thailand
NCT Number: NCT06272019
To compare the iodine remaining in saliva between gargle method and swab method
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–30 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bangkok, Thailand
separate the participant in 2 groups group 1 use iodine gargle with gargle method, after 48 hours use iodine gargle with swab method group 2 use iodine gargle with swab method, after 48 hours use iodine gargle with gargle method The researcher will collect saliva before use iodine gargle and after use at time 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, 120 minutes
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Iodine gargle 0.2 %
Time frame: 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes
The retention of iodine in saliva after get the gargle (show in percentage)
Time frame: 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60 and 120 minutes
The comparison of rate of retention of iodine in saliva between gargle and swab (show in percentage)
Chulalongkorn University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.