Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05069974

Alternative Antibiotics for Syphilis

The Trep-AB clinical trial will test the efficacy of an investigational neuropenetrative drug, Linezolid (LZD), compared to standard treatment, Benzathine penicillin G (BPG), for early syphilis in humans. The overarching idea of the work proposed herein is to investigate the use of LZD to treat syphilis, conducting a randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate this new indication of a known antibacterial agent.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

The syphilis epidemic is rampant around the world, and therapeutic options are restricted to an antibiotic, intramuscular (IM) benzathine penicillin G (BPG), which does not efficiently cross the blood-brain barrier. Treponema pallidum (T.p.), the bacteria that causes syphilis, invades the central nervous system (CNS) in 40% of patients, usually without symptoms. The prognostic implications of CNS invasion are the potential for severe neurologic complications, and treatment failure due to sequestered bacteria in the CNS. When indicated, the only way to identify and treat neurosyphilis is by lumbar puncture to examine the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), followed by intravenous (IV) Benzyl penicillin therapy. The invetigators have carried out in silico studies showing that oxazolidinones are potentially active against T.p., are neuropenetrative and can be administered orally. The invetigators have carried out preclinical studies using an in vitro culture system for T.p. and the use of the syphilis animal model with rabbits to test different antibiotics. The invetigators have confirmed that LZD was the best compound that could go on to be tested in clinical trials to treat syphilis.

The Trep-AB clinical trial will test the non-inferiority of an investigational neuropenetrative drug, LZD, compared to standard treatment BPG, for early syphilis in humans conducting a randomized controlled clinical.

Primary objective is to demonstrate the non-inferiority of LZD treatment compared with standard BPG treatment to cure patients with early syphilis. Seconday objective is to isolate T.p. strains in clinical samples to subtype DNA from patients at baseline and during recurrence or treatment failure.

Protocol History 05 Oct 2021 - Initial registration - Master protocol registered. Initial regimen: linezolid 600 mg once daily for 5 days.

Oct 2022 - Recruitment to the once-daily 5-day regimen was discontinued due to futility in the prespecified interim analysis.

02 Feb 2023 - Major protocol amended to evaluate linezolid 600 mg twice daily for 10 days (RCT2). Sample size recalculated using revised efficacy assumptions (observed BPG efficacy >95% instead of 90%). Primary endpoint and overall statistical design unchanged.

17 Oct 2023 - Added UK participation and additional recruiting sites. 2024-2025 - Administrative and operational revisions Current protocol - This record reflects the final master protocol for the evaluation of linezolid 600 mg twice daily for 10 days.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older at baseline visit.
  • Primary, secondary or early latent syphilis diagnosis based on SEIMC/IUSTI Guidelines*
  • Primary syphilis is defined as typical ulcer (chancre) and one of the following: detection of T.p. by Polymerase chain reaction (PCR), positive darkfield examination (DFE) or positive serological test (RPR≥1:4) for syphilis.
  • Secondary syphilis is defined based on typical clinical symptoms with positive treponemal and non-treponemal tests (RPR≥1:4).
  • Early latent syphilis is defined as positive serological treponemal and non-treponemal tests (RPR≥1:4) with no clinical evidence of infection, with a previous negative syphilis serology,or a four-fold increase in RPR titer of a non-treponemal test within the past 12 months.Serological tests for syphilis performed within 10 days prior to study inclusion visit willbe acceptable for enrollment.
  • Signature of written informed consent.
  • Ability to comply with the requirements of the study protocol.
  • If women of childbearing potential, use of a highly effective method of contraception (abstinence,hormonal contraception, intra-uterine device [IUD], or anatomical sterility in self or partner)committed during 1 week after last IMP administration.
  • If men, use of condom during heterosexual intercourse and use of a highly effective method ofcontraception (abstinence, hormonal contraception, intra-uterine device [IUD], or anatomical sterilityin self or partner) in female partner committed during 1 week after last IMP administration.
  • For inclusion purposes, positive point of care tests (POCT) will be accepted in selected patients without previous syphilis history and negative serological tests for syphilis during the last 12 months (Syphilis rapid diagnostic test [RDT] or Chembio DPP syphilis screen & confirm assay [DPP]), or with a previous history of syphilis and negative non-treponemal tests during the last 12 months (DPP). Further confirmation by the methods described in a), b) or c) will be necessary. Participants whose diagnosis is not confirmed will be excluded from the efficacy analyses.

Exclusion criteria

  • Known allergy to any of the IMPs and/or excipients, particularly known hypersensitivity to penicillin, cephalosporins or other beta-lactam agents and/or allergy to soya or peanut.
  • Lactose or galactose intolerance or glucose-galactose malabsorbtion.
  • Diagnosis criteria of symptomatic neurosyphilis.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Current treatment with any drugs likely to interact with the study medication (see Appendix 6).
  • Have taken any antibiotics with potential activity against syphilis (e.g. beta lactams, cephalosporines, macrolides, tetracyclines) within 1 week prior to randomization.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, pheochromocytoma, thyrotoxicosis, carcinoid syndrome, bipolar disorder, incapacitating psycho-affective disturbance, acute confusional state.
  • Renal function impairment requiring hemodialysis.
  • Symptomatic concomitant STI (i.e., gonococcus, chlamydia, lymphogranuloma venereum, Mycoplasma genitalium) or other infection disease requiring antibiotic treatment potentially active against syphilis.
  • Having received treatment for the early syphilis recently diagnosed (In the previous 6 months)

Treatment and study plan

Linezolid 600 mg (RCT 2)

Drug

Linezolid every 12hours during 10 days (cohort 2).

Benzathine Penicilllin G (RCT 2)

Drug

Single dose of intramuscular BPG (RCT 2).

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants achieving overall treatment success

    Time frame: at week 48

    Overall treatment success was defined as achievement of all outcome components applicable to the participant: clinical cure, serological cure, and absence of molecularly confirmed relapse.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients with clinical resolution of primary syphilis lesions (clinical cure, primary).

    Time frame: at week 2

    Assesment of clinical resolution defined as the complete healing of primary syphilis lesions within 2 weeks from treatment start.

  2. Proportion of patients with clinical resolution of secondary syphilis lesions (clinical cure, secondary).

    Time frame: at week 6

    Assesment of clinical resolution defined as the complete healing of secondary syphilis lesions within 6 weeks from treatment start.

  3. Proportion of patients with adequate serological response (serological cure, week 48).

    Time frame: at week 48

    Assessment of adequate serological response defined as a four-fold decline in rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer or seroreversion to negative.

  4. Proportion of patients with allelic variation in T. pallidum strain(s) DNA in recurrent syphilis or suspected treatment failure (absence of relapse).

    Time frame: From date of randomization until date of first documented recurrence or treatment failure, assesed up to 48 weeks

    Assessment of re-infection in recurrent syphilis as defined by allelic variation in core genes of T. pallidum strain(s) compared to baseline using a molecular method (MLST-WGS) in ulcer or mucosa lesions swabs, plasma, or oral swabs.

  5. Proportion of patients with adequate serological response (serological cure, week 12).

    Time frame: at week 12

    Assessment of adequate serological response defined as a four-fold decline in rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer or seroreversion to negative.

  6. Proportion of patients with adequate serological response (serological cure, week 24).

    Time frame: at week 24

    Assessment of adequatesserological response defined as a four-fold decline in rapid plasma reagin (RPR) titer or seroreversion to negative.

  7. Proportion of patients with antibiotic resistance genotype.

    Time frame: From date of randomization until date of first documented recurrence, assesed up to 48 weeks

    Assesment of allelic variation in core genes conferring antimicrobial resistance in clinical specimens from patients who are considered to have treatment failure compared to patients with adequate clinical and serological response.

  8. Proportion of participants experiencing adverse events.

    Time frame: up to 12 weeks

    Assesment of adverse events related to LZD treatment compared with adverse events related to standard BPG treatment in participants with early syphilis.

  9. Proportion of patients who have a change in the RPR titer within 2 weeks after treatment start of primary syphilis.

    Time frame: at 2 weeks

    Assessment of RPR titer variation at week 2 from treatment start of patients with primary syphilis.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades Infecciosas y la Promoción de la Salud y la Ciencia

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Oral and Neuro-Penetrative Alternative Antibiotics for Patients With Syphilis

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Oct 6, 2021
Registry last updated
Jul 28, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.