cancer hospital Chinese academy of medical sciences
Beijing, China
NCT Number: NCT03787992
To assess the efficacy and safety of Alflutinib Mesylate versus Gefitinib in patients with locally advanced or Metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Beijing, China
This is a Phase III, double-blind, randomised study assessing the efficacy and safety of Alflutinib Mesylate (AST2818) (80 mg orally, once daily) versus Gefitinib (250 mg orally, once daily] in patients with locally advanced or metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) that is known to be EGFR sensitising mutation (EGFRm) positive for first-line treatment with an EGFR-TKI.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The initial dose of AST2818 80 mg once daily can be reduced to 40 mg once daily under specific circumstances. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment.
Number of Cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.
The initial dose of Placebo Gefitinib 250 mg once daily cannot be reduced. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment. Number of cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.
The initial dose of Gefitinib 250mg once daily cannot be reduced. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment.
Number of Cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.
The initial dose of Placebo AST2818 80 mg once daily can be reduced to Placebo AST2818 40 mg once daily under specific circumstances. A cycle of treatment is defined as 21 days of once daily treatment. Number of cycles: as long as patients are continuing to show clinical benefit, as judged by the Investigator, and in the absence of discontinuation criteria.
Time frame: At baseline and every 6 weeks for the first 17 months and then every 12 weeks relative to randomisation until progression ( (approximately 12 months)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression and was used to assess the efficacy of single agent alflutinib compared with SoC EGFR-TKI therapy as measured by PFS.
Time frame: From first dose to end of study or date of death from any cause, whichever comes first, assessed every 6 weeks (approximately 29 months)
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomisation until death from any cause and was used to further assess the efficacy of alflutinib compared with SoC EGFR-TKI therapy
Time frame: At baseline and every 6 weeks for the first 17 months and then every 12 weeks relative to randomisation until progression (approximately 12 months)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death (by any cause in the absence of progression) regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression and was used to assess the efficacy of single agent alflutinib compared with SoC EGFR-TKI therapy as measured by PFS.
Time frame: At baseline and every 6 weeks for the first 17 months and then every 12 weeks relative to randomisation until progression (approximately 12 months)
ORR was defined as the number (%) of patients with measurable disease with at least 1 visit response of Complete response (CR) or Partial response (PR) and it was used to further assess the efficacy of alflutinib compared with SoC EGFR-TKI therapy
Time frame: At baseline and every 6 weeks for the first 17 months and then every 12 weeks relative to randomisation until progression (approximately 12 months)
Duration of response was defined as the time from the date of first documented response until the date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression and was used to further assess the efficacy of alflutinib compared with SoC EGFR-TKI therapy.
Time frame: At baseline and every 6 weeks for the first 17 months and then every 12 weeks relative to randomisation until progression (approximately 12 months)
The Depth of response was defined as the relative change in the sum of the longest diameters of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Target lesions (TLs) at the nadir, in the absence of new lesions (NLs) or progression of Non-target lesions (NTLs), compared to baseline and was used to further assess the efficacy of alflutinib compared with SoC EGFR-TKI therapy
Time frame: Questionnaires completed at week 1, 4, 7, 9, 12, 15 , 18,21,27,33,39,45and51
The EORTC QLQ-LC13 was a lung-cancer-specific module comprising 13 questions to assess lung cancer symptoms (cough, haemoptysis, dyspnoea, and site-specific pain [pain in chest, pain in arm or shoulder, and pain in other parts); treatment related side-effects (sore mouth, dysphagia, peripheral neuropathy, and alopecia); and pain medication. Except for a multi-item scale for dyspnoea, all were single items. An outcome variable consisting of a score from 0 to 100 was derived for each of the symptom scales/symptom items. Higher scores on the global health status/QoL and functioning scales indicated better health status/QoL and better function. Higher scores on the symptoms scales indicated greater symptom burden. The results of the analyses were presented in terms of a least squares mean together with its associated 95% profile likelihood CI
Time frame: Questionnaires completed at week 1, 4, 7, 9, 12, 15 , 18,21,27,33,39,45and51
he EORTC QLQ-C30 cancer-specific questionnaire consisted of 30 questions, which were combined to produce 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social); 3 symptom scales (Fatigue, Pain, Nausea/Vomiting); 6 individual items (dyspnoea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhoea, and financial difficulties); and a global measure of health status/QoL. An outcome variable consisting of a score from 0 to 100 was derived for each of the symptom scales/symptom items, the functional scales, and the global health status/QoL scale in the EORTC QLQ-C30. Higher scores on the global health status and functioning scales indicated better health status/function. Higher scores on the symptoms scales indicated greater symptom burden. The results of the analyses were presented in terms of a least squares mean together with its associated 95% profile likelihood CI.
Allist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Industry
A Randomized, Double-blind, Positive-controlled, Multi-center Phase III Clinical Study of Evaluating Alflutinib Mesylate Versus Gefitinib as First-line Therapy in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With EGFR-sensitive Mutations(FlAG)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.