Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05208593

Alcohol PBS and Thinking About the Past

Individuals often think of how a situation or outcome could have turned out differently -- if only something was different or something had changed, then the outcome could have been better or worse. This is a common type of thinking, known as counterfactual thinking, that often takes the form of "if only" statements. These thoughts are frequent after negative events, but have also been found to occur after positive events and 'near misses'. Research has shown that their evaluative nature elicits a variety of consequences, such as biased decision making, changes in an event's meaningfulness, heightened positive or negative affect, and future behavioral changes (such as intentions, motivation, persistence/effort. Specifically, many areas of research involving counterfactuals have often looked into key elements that are often discussed in other health behavior literature, such as self-efficacy, motivation, and intentions. One such area that incorporates these elements is health promotion literature, such as Protective Behavioral Strategies (PBS) and alcohol consumption. The objectives of this study are laid out as such: First, to further explore the role counterfactuals play in increasing an individual's intentions toward behavioral change. Second, to further elucidate the inner and outer workings of Protective Behavioral Strategies for increasing positive health behaviors. Finally, to address the applicability of a counterfactual intervention on promoting intentions to use PBS.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Texas A&M University

College Station, Texas, 77843, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • minimum age of 18 years

Exclusion criteria

  • no exclusions at baseline
  • participants who do not follow the instructions for the specific writing task will be unable to sign-up for the remaining follow up sessions (Parts 2-6) and will be excluded the final data analyses

Treatment and study plan

Negative Event + Counterfactual Task

Behavioral

Participants will complete a counterfactual based intervention where they come up with three if only..then statements about how a past drinking behavior could have been altered to be better and to think about protective behavioral strategies that they could use in a future similar situation to make the outcome better.

Personalized Normative Feedback

Behavioral

Participants will be asked to rate the frequency and quantity of students who use protective behavioral strategies while drinking. They will be given feedback on how close their estimate is from the national averages.

Negative Event + Factual Thinking Task

Behavioral

Active Control condition where participants write about a negative event and list three facts about it

Negative Event Only

Behavioral

Participants are asked to write about a negative event related to alcohol and write about it

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Protective Behavioral Strategies-20

    Time frame: Weeks 1 - 6

    The Protective Behavioral Strategy-20 measure is a 20-item questionnaire assessing the use of three types of Protective Behavioral Strategies: serious harm reduction (8 items), stopping/limiting drinking (7 items), and manner of drinking (5 items). Each item has response options consisting of 1 (Never), 2 (Rarely), 3 (Occasionally), 4 (Sometimes), 5 (Usually), 6 (Always); there is also a Do not wish to respond option. Protective Behavioral Strategy Use scores are average scores for each subscale, with minimum scores of 0 and maximum scores of 6. Higher scores indicate greater use of protective behavioral strategies.

  2. Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire

    Time frame: Week 1

    The Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire is a 48-item questionnaire assessing problems from alcohol consumption within the last three months. Each item is categorized into one of eight problem domains: social/interpersonal, academic/occupational, risky behavior, impaired control, poor self-care, diminished self-perception, blackout drinking, and physiological dependence. For each item, participants select Yes, No, or Do not wish to respond to indicate whether they have experienced each problem from alcohol consumption (e.g., "I have become very rude, obnoxious or insulting after drinking"). If a participant selects Yes that is indicative of the participant having experienced that specific consequence from alcohol consumption.

  3. Alcohol Use Contemplation to Change Ladder

    Time frame: Week 1

    To assess an individual's contemplation to change their alcohol drinking behavior, a Contemplation to Change Ladder (Biener & Abrams, 1991) will be used. This ladder displays response options on a ladder graphic, with rungs starting at 0 and ending at 10; each rung increases by one point value as you go up the ladder. Anchors with text descriptions are located at points 0 (No thought of quitting), 2 (Think I need to consider quitting someday), 5 (Think I should quit but not quite ready), 8 (Starting to think about how to change my drinking patterns), and 10 (Taking action to quit e.g., cutting down, enrolling in a program). The higher a participant selects a rung on the ladder, the higher the contemplation to change their alcohol drinking behavior.

  4. Change in Indication of Drinking and Strategy Use

    Time frame: Week 2 - Week 6

    A measure that assesses an individual's ability to avoid alcohol if they wanted to as well as binge-drinking or the ability to drink less in the next week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Perceived Behavioral Control

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 2

    The Perceived Behavioral Control questionnaire measure is made up of six items. Three items assess the individual's ability to avoid alcohol if they wanted to and three items assess binge-drinking or the ability to drink less than 7(females) or 10 (males) units in a single session in the next week. Each item is scored on separate 7-point bipolar adjective scales (e.g., "For me to avoid drinking alcohol is…" very difficult to very easy). The six items will be averaged together to obtain an overall score for Perceived Behavioral Control. Higher scores indicate greater perceived behavioral control to control drinking behavior.

  2. Change in Delay Discounting

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 4 and Week 6

    A measure of the amount participants discount delayed rewards

  3. Change in Counterfactual Use and Intentions

    Time frame: Week 2 - Week 6

    Participants responses about whether they did counterfactuals in the past week and their intentions to use those behaviors in the next week.

  4. Change in Personal Assessment of Responsible Drinker Identity Scale

    Time frame: Week 1, Week 4 and Week 6

    Participants are asked to indicate how true each statement in the Personal Assessment of Responsible Drinker Identity Scale is of the participant's experiences overall. Each item of this measure has response options ranging from 1 (not at all true) to 5 (completely true). Higher scores reflect greater agreement with identifying as a responsible drinker.

  5. Change in Perceptions of Protective Behavioral Strategies

    Time frame: Week 1 - Week 6

    Questions about the percentage and frequency of use of protective behavioral strategies among college students.

  6. Change in Contemplation to Change Ladder

    Time frame: Week 1 and Week 2

    To assess an individual's contemplation to change their alcohol drinking behavior, a Contemplation to Change Ladder (Biener & Abrams, 1991) will be used. This ladder displays response options on a ladder graphic, with rungs starting at 0 and ending at 10; each rung increases by one point value as you go up the ladder. Anchors with text descriptions are located at points 0 (No thought of quitting), 2 (Think I need to consider quitting someday), 5 (Think I should quit but not quite ready), 8 (Starting to think about how to change my drinking patterns), and 10 (Taking action to quit e.g., cutting down, enrolling in a program). The higher a participant selects a rung on the ladder, the higher the contemplation to change their alcohol drinking behavior.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Texas A&M University

Other

Collaborators

  • University of Central Florida

Registry information

Official study title

Alcohol Protective Behavioral Strategies and Thinking About the Past

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2022
Study completion
2022
First posted
Jan 26, 2022
Registry last updated
Apr 13, 2023

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.