First Lviv Medical Union
Lviv, Ukraine
NCT Number: NCT07443553
Postamputation pain is a complex condition that includes phantom limb pain (PLP), stump pain and residual limb pain (RLP), the latter of which may be referred from joints, the spine and inflamed bursa and tendons. PLP may have peripheral, spinal and central etiologies. The evidence of peripheral mechanisms includes the relief of both PLP and RLP during local anesthetic (LA) infusions, the relief of PLP and RLP with sympathetic blocks and neuroma injections, and the development of phantom radicular pain in amputees with a herniated disc.
Neurolysis and defunctionalization are long-lasting treatments for pain when LA blocks provide temporary benefit, being most commonly used for cancer pain (e.g., celiac plexus neurolysis). Neurolysis has also been used to treat PAP, with uncontrolled studies showing benefit for both RLP and PLP. However, there are no controlled studies demonstrating efficacy. In this small study, we will evaluate the effectiveness of alcohol neurolysis of lower extremity neuromas (femoral or saphenous; sciatic or common peroneal and/or tibial; obturator and/ or lateral femoral cutaneous when pain is in those distributions) in individuals with RLP and PLP.
For individuals with upper extremity amputation in whom non-selective neurolysis may affect the ability to use certain prosthetics that depend on functioning nerve and muscle signals, high-concentration capsaicin will be injected in an observational arm. The investigators will also examine factors associated with treatment outcome in a subset of patients (e.g., functional MRI, quantitative sensory testing).
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Lviv, Ukraine
Up to 130 patients with lower extremity amputations and PAP will be randomized by a computer-generated randomization table in a 1:1 ratio in blocks of 20 to receive peri-neuroma injections of either lidocaine 2% + 100% ethyl alcohol, or lidocaine 2% + saline, around the following neuromas: 1) Femoral, or saphenous nerve below the adductor canal; 2) sciatic, or common peroneal and/or posterior tibial beneath the popliteal fossa; 3) obturator (in above the knee amputees); and 4) lateral femoral cutaneous (in above the knee amputees). The painful neuromas to be treated will be determined by physical exam (e.g., Tinel's sign, pain reproduction during palpation or use of a prosthesis), and PLP patterns correlating with nerve distributions (e.g., a person with only foot PLP will not have the obturator or lateral femoral cutaneous neuromas injected; a patient who perceives phantom pain only in the top of their foot, or the lateral side of their ankle, may require only neurolysis of the common peroneal nerve or saphenous nerve, respectively). Those with bilateral lower extremity amputations who meet inclusion criteria for both limbs will be suballocated to have an alcohol injection on one side and a lidocaine injection on the other, in random order (estimated 10-20 patients). The side that receives local anesthetic alone and the side that receives local anesthetic and alcohol will be determined by a computer-generated random number table.
The location of the painful neuromas will be identified by physical exam and confirmed via either ultrasound or electrical stimulation (e.g., using a radiofrequency machine or nerve stimulator, with concordant stimulation in the painful area(s) ideally noted at < 0.5 volts). Patients with unilateral lower extremity amputations who meet selection criteria will be allocated via a computer-generated randomization table in blocks of 20 to receive either: 1) an injection of 2 mL lidocaine 2% at each painful neuroma over 5 minutes, followed by 1.5 mL saline within 5 minutes; or 2) 2 mL lidocaine 2% at each painful neuroma over 5 minutes followed by 1.25-3.5 mL 98-100% dehydrated ethyl alcohol (the volume depends on the voltage threshold, i.e., thresholds > 0.5 mL may warrant the 23.5 mL higher volume ). For those suballocated with bilateral lower extremity amputations, both painful sides will receive an injection of 2 mL lidocaine 2% per neuroma site over 5 minutes. Then after approximately 5 minutes, the side allocated to receive alcohol with have that side injected with 1.25-3.5 mL of 98-100% alcohol while the other side will receive 1.5 mL of normal saline; the lidocaine is given first because the alcohol can burn when injected, and normal saline has been shown to provide some therapeutic effect by washing out inflammatory cytokines and breaking up adhesive scar tissue, both of which may mediate neuroma-related pain. The injections will be performed with 20-22-gauge needles or stimulating needles (when a nerve stimulator is used), depending on the means for neuroma location.
After 6 weeks (primary endpoint) in the randomized double-blind portion, those with a negative categorical outcome (< 30% pain relief or < 4/7 on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scale) will be unblinded to receive alternative treatments. The next follow-up for those with a successful 6-week outcome will be 12 weeks. For those with a successful 12-week outcome, the final follow-up will occur at 6 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Injection of 98-100% alcohol over painful neuromas after lidocaine 2% injected.
Injection of Lidocaine 2% followed by normal saline
Other names: Blinded control arm for alcohol neurolysis
Painful upper neuroma neuromas will be injected if patients experience at least 30% pain relief with lidocaine. These patients (upper extremity amputees) are an observational cohort.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Average phantom limb pain on 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time frame: 6 weeks after treatment
Residual limb pain on 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time frame: 2 weeks
Average and worst phantom limb pain on 0-10 NRS
Time frame: 2 weeks
Average and worst residual limb pain on 0-10 NRS
Time frame: 6 weeks
Worst residual limb pain on 0-10 NRS
Time frame: 6 weeks
Worst phantom limb pain on 0-10 NRS
Time frame: 12 weeks
Average and worst phantom limb pain on 0-10 NRS
Time frame: 12 weeks
Average and worst residual limb pain on 0-10 NRS
Time frame: 6 months
Average and worst phantom limb pain on 0-10 NRS
Time frame: 6 months
Average and worst residual limb pain on 0-10 NRS
Time frame: 2 weeks
0-21 scale measuring anxiety and depression (higher scores indicate greater disease burden, each component is measured from 0-21)
Time frame: 6 weeks
0-21 scale measuring anxiety and depression (higher scores indicate greater disease burden, each component is measured from 0-21)
Time frame: 12 weeks
0-21 scale measuring anxiety and depression (higher scores indicate greater disease burden, each component is measured from 0-21)
Time frame: 6 months
0-21 scale measuring anxiety and depression (higher scores indicate greater disease burden, each component is measured from 0-21)
Time frame: 2 weeks
Measure of somatic symptoms from 0-32, with higher scores indicating greater disease burden
Time frame: 6 weeks
Measure of somatic symptoms from 0-32, with higher scores indicating greater disease burden
Time frame: 12 weeks
Measure of somatic symptoms from 0-32, with higher scores indicating greater disease burden
Time frame: 6 months
Measure of somatic symptoms from 0-32, with higher scores indicating greater disease burden
Time frame: 2 weeks
Instrument measuring sleep quality scored from 0-24 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction
Time frame: 6 weeks
Instrument measuring sleep quality scored from 0-24 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction
Time frame: 12 weeks
Instrument measuring sleep quality scored from 0-24 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction
Time frame: 6 months
Instrument measuring sleep quality scored from 0-24 with higher scores indicating greater dysfunction
Time frame: 2 weeks
Instrument measuring PTSD symptoms from 0-80 with higher scores indicating greater disease burden
Time frame: 6 weeks
Instrument measuring PTSD symptoms from 0-80 with higher scores indicating greater disease burden
Time frame: 12 weeks
Instrument measuring PTSD symptoms from 0-80 with higher scores indicating greater disease burden
Time frame: 6 months
Instrument measuring PTSD symptoms from 0-80 with higher scores indicating greater disease burden
Time frame: 2 weeks
EuroQol group instrument measuring quality of life, on 5 dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/discomfort, and Anxiety/depression) with 5 severity levels. Each segment is measured from 1-5 (5 indicates greater disease burden).
Time frame: 6 weeks
EuroQol group instrument measuring quality of life, on 5 dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/discomfort, and Anxiety/depression) with 5 severity levels. Each segment is measured from 1-5 (5 indicates greater disease burden).
Time frame: 12 weeks
EuroQol group instrument measuring quality of life, on 5 dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/discomfort, and Anxiety/depression) with 5 severity levels. Each segment is measured from 1-5 (5 indicates greater disease burden).
Time frame: 6 months
EuroQol group instrument measuring quality of life, on 5 dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain/discomfort, and Anxiety/depression) with 5 severity levels. Each segment is measured from 1-5 (5 indicates greater disease burden).
Time frame: 2 weeks
1-7 Likert scale graded from 1 (the same or worse) through 7 (a great deal better). A score of 4 (somewhat better) accompanied by at least 30% pain relief designates a positive outcome.
Time frame: 6 weeks
1-7 Likert scale graded from 1 (the same or worse) through 7 (a great deal better). A score of 4 (somewhat better) accompanied by at least 30% pain relief designates a positive outcome.
Time frame: 12 weeks
1-7 Likert scale graded from 1 (the same or worse) through 7 (a great deal better). A score of 4 (somewhat better) accompanied by at least 30% pain relief designates a positive outcome.
Time frame: 6 months
1-7 Likert scale graded from 1 (the same or worse) through 7 (a great deal better). A score of 4 (somewhat better) accompanied by at least 30% pain relief designates a positive outcome.
Time frame: 2 weeks
Positive outcome designated as at least 30% pain relief coupled with a PGIC score of at least 4. This will be designated for the two primary outcomes, residual limb and phantom pain.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Positive outcome designated as at least 30% pain relief coupled with a PGIC score of at least 4. This will be designated for the two primary outcomes, residual limb and phantom pain.
Time frame: 12 weeks
Positive outcome designated as at least 30% pain relief coupled with a PGIC score of at least 4. This will be designated for the two primary outcomes, residual limb and phantom pain.
Time frame: 6 months
Positive outcome designated as at least 30% pain relief coupled with a PGIC score of at least 4. This will be designated for the two primary outcomes, residual limb and phantom pain.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Northwestern University
Other
Randomized Controlled and Observational Studies Evaluating Alcohol Neurolysis and Capsaicin for Postamputation Pain (PAP)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07626983
Chronic Pain Due to Injury, Combat Related Symptoms
Kyiv, Vinnytsia Oblast, Ukraine
View Trial DetailsNCT07438795
Amputation, Traumatic, Barotrauma
View Trial DetailsNCT07618689
Cryoablation, Neoplasms
Vinnytsia, Вінницька, Ukraine
View Trial DetailsNCT07475871
Chronic Pain, Military Combat Stress Reaction
Lviv, Ukraine
View Trial Details