University of Caen Normandy
Caen, Normandy, 14032, France
NCT Number: NCT05565989
The emergence of new problematic alcohol consumption practices among young people requires new dynamics in prevention strategies. In this context, the ADUC project (Alcohol and Drugs at the University of Caen) aims to develop a better understanding of alcohol consumption, and in particular the practice of binge drinking (BD), in order to develop relevant and adapted prevention tools. The ALCOMEDIIT study (IRESP funding; Agreement 20II31-00 - ADUC part 3) is a randomized controlled trial that focuses on the specific determinant of impulsivity. The main objective of this experiment in social psychology is to validate a program for the prevention of BD practices based on motivational interviewing (MI) associated with intention implementation (II) and mindfulness meditation (MBM) in a student environment.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–30 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Caen, Normandy, 14032, France
Context. The emergence of new problematic alcohol consumption practices among young people requires new dynamics in prevention strategies. In this context, the ADUC project (Alcohol and Drugs at the University of Caen) aims to develop a better understanding of alcohol consumption, and in particular the practice of binge drinking (BD), in order to develop relevant and adapted prevention tools. The first step, logistically supported by the University of Caen, consisted in identifying the levels of alcohol consumption of students, the prevalence of binge drinking, and their determinants. Based on more than 7000 participants interviewed, it essentially demonstrated 1) an alarming 22% prevalence of BD among students and 2) four main psychological determinants, namely impulsivity (i.e., the tendency of individuals to act prematurely without fully weighing the consequences of their action), subjective norm (i.e., perception of what is done and/or approved by peers), drinker identity (i.e., how the individual defines him/herself as a drinker), and motivations to drink (social, compliance, enhancement, or coping motivations).
Objective. The ALCOMEDIIT study (IRESP funding; Agreement 20II31-00 - ADUC part 3) is a randomized controlled trial that focuses on the specific determinant of impulsivity. The main objective of this experiment in social psychology is to validate a program for the prevention of BD practices based on motivational interviewing (MI) associated with intention implementation (II) and mindfulness meditation (MBM) in a student environment.
Materials and Methods. This study will include 120 healthy subjects who will be students at the University of Caen Normandy. They will be people who consume alcohol, having a BD score > 1 in the month preceding the inclusion but not presenting any specific disorder. The trial will be proposed to them by e-mail and the people who meet the inclusion criteria will join either a control group which will benefit from a MI, or an experimental group which will also benefit from a MI but which will be associated with an initiation to MBM with II (initial visit T0). In order to measure the effectiveness of the prevention device in terms of reducing the use of BD, a follow-up at 1 month (T1) as well as a follow-up at 6 months (T6; exploratory) will be proposed to all participants. The total duration of this research protocol is one year.
Hypothesis tested. The aim of this work is to evaluate the interest of associating mindfulness meditation practices, practices implemented to optimize their use, with a motivational interview in a prevention program aiming at reducing alcohol use and the practice of BD in the student population.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
An initiation to MBM practice (including 4 exercices) and 2 intention implementation exercices are proposed to participants
A motivational Interview will be conducted with participant.
Time frame: 1 month
The BD score (Townshend & Duka, 2005) is calculated on the basis of 3 distinct elements (Q1: "number of average standard drinks per hour (containing about 10g of pure alcohol in France)"; Q2: "number of drunken episodes in the last month" and Q3; "percentage of drunken episodes among the occasions of drinking"). The score results from the following weighting: (4 x Q1) + Q2*6 + (0.2 x Q3). This score considers both the quantity and frequency of drinking, thus integrating the dimension of repeated alcohol withdrawal.
Time frame: 1 month
1 item measuring craving
Time frame: 6 months
1 item measuring craving
Time frame: 1 month
UPPS Scores
Time frame: 6 months
UPPS Scores
Time frame: 1 month
This self-assessment based on the transtheoretical model of behaviour change (Prochaska & DiClemente, 1982, DiClemente & Prochaska, 1982) is recognized for its reliability and validity. The RTC-Alcohol has three different scales that correspond to an assessment of the three main stages of behaviour change: the pre-contemplation, contemplation and action stages. Based on the person's score on each of these scales, the experimenter determines which stage of behavior change the person is in.
Time frame: 6 months
This self-assessment based on the transtheoretical model of behaviour change (Prochaska & DiClemente, 1982, DiClemente & Prochaska, 1982) is recognized for its reliability and validity. The RTC-Alcohol has three different scales that correspond to an assessment of the three main stages of behaviour change: the pre-contemplation, contemplation and action stages. Based on the person's score on each of these scales, the experimenter determines which stage of behavior change the person is in.
Time frame: 6 month
number of alcoholic drinks
Time frame: 6 month
The BD score (Townshend & Duka, 2005) is calculated on the basis of 3 distinct elements (Q1: "number of average standard drinks per hour (containing about 10g of pure alcohol in France)"; Q2: "number of drunken episodes in the last 6 months" and Q3; "percentage of drunken episodes among the occasions of drinking"). The score results from the following weighting: (4 x Q1) + Q2 + (0.2 x Q3). This score considers both the quantity and frequency of drinking, thus integrating the dimension of repeated alcohol withdrawal.
Time frame: 1 month
Number of alcoholic drinks
University Hospital, Caen
Other
Acronym: ALCOMEDIIT
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03449095
Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol Intoxication
Champaign, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05362357
Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol-Related Disorders
Northridge, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04853628
Adolescent Behavior, Alcohol Drinking
Seville, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT03930446
Alcohol Drinking, Alcohol-Related Disorders
View Trial Details