Medical University of Vienna
Vienna, State of Vienna, 1090, Austria
NCT Number: NCT01961817
Is there a difference in vocal cord visualization between the retromolar and conventional access?
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Vienna, State of Vienna, 1090, Austria
Management of the difficult airway is still an essential part of modern anaesthesia. Up to now, there have bee no clinical investigations comparing the intubation method via the retromolar route (RM), with the conventional intubation route (CM).
For the present clinical investigation, 100 patients undergoing elective surgery will be investigated in the General Hospital of Vienna when for the anaesthesia intubation is required. In both intubation methods (RM and CM) the anaesthesiologist will visually determine the Cormack & Lehane score in a randomly assigned sequence with and without a BURP-manoeuvre (= backwards, upwards and rightwards pressure). Thereafter intubation is performed in all patients by the CM method and if intubation fails the RM technique will be used. Of course, as per usual, every intubation trial is interrupted by a 20 second 100%-oxygen-ventilation period to reach a pulse oximetry oxygen saturation of at least 97% SpO2. Thereafter, if intubation fails again every other intubation technique will be applied, as necessary and called for.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
For easier insertion of the laryngoscope the head of the patient will be turned to the left site. Thereafter the blade (Miller) will be inserted into the mouth and pushed carefully as far as possible laterally to receive a direct view of the vocal cords. Then the performing anesthesiologist determine the Cormack & Lehane score without and thereafter with a BURP (backward upward rightward pressure) maneuver.
The head of the patient will be positioned as usual. After 2 minutes oxygen insufflation the laryngoscope will be inserted laterally to push the tongue to the left side in order to release the sight to the vocal cords. Thereafter the anesthesiologist determines the Cormack & Lehane score without and thereafter with performance of the BURP (backward upward rightward pressure) maneuver.
Time frame: After Intubation
In our present clinical trial we intend to compare the vocal cord visualisation by using the retromolar access compared to conventional intubation technique.
Visualisation will be performed by randomized sequence and both methods will be performed in each patient. When no 100% visualisation of the vocal cords is achievable, a BURP (backward upward rightward pressure) manoeuvre will be performed.
The same procedure will be performed for the another technique as well. For each trial, the anaesthesist has max. 30 seconds time for the vocal cord visualisation and scoring, which includes also the performance of the BURP-manoeuvre. Thereafter, and between each of the vocal cord visualizations as well, the patient will be ventilated by 100% oxygen for at least 20 seconds to reach at least 97% SpO2.
Then intubation is performed in all patients by the conventional methode, and if intubation fails the retromolar technique, if possible.
Medical University of Vienna
Other
Airway Management Via the Retromolar Route Access - a Clinical Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04206566
Airway Management, Emergency Medicine
Mora, Dalarna County, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT00956592
Airway Management, Intubation
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06653166
Airway Management, Intubation
Zug, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsNCT06261619
Airway Management, Pathologic Processes
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
View Trial Details