Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07618221

Air vs. Liquid: A Study on Cystoscopy Performance and Visibility Enhancement in Macrohematuria Cases

Macroscopic haematuria is a common urological emergency. Diagnostic cystoscopy is the gold standard for identifying the bleeding source; however, blood and clots within the bladder significantly impair endoscopic visibility when saline is used as the distension medium.

Air-based cystoscopy, a technique first described in the 19th century, exploits the immiscibility of gas and blood to maintain clear visualisation even during active bleeding. Despite its theoretical advantages, no randomised clinical data exist to support its use.

AIROSCOPY is a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-centre superiority study comparing air-based versus saline-based flexible cystoscopy in patients with macroscopic haematuria (Grade III-V). Patients are randomised 1:1. Only the index cystoscopy (first randomised modality) contributes to all study endpoints. A second cystoscopy with the alternative modality is performed solely for patient safety to ensure no diagnostic disadvantage from study participation. This second examination is not analysed.

The primary endpoint is identification of the bleeding source during the index cystoscopy (binary: yes/no). Secondary endpoints include time to source identification, total procedure duration, urologist-rated visibility (Likert scale), and patient comfort (Likert scale).

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Kantonsspital Baden AG, Department of Urology

Baden, Canton of Aargau, 5404, Switzerland

Location contact

Lasse Petersen, Dr.med. univ.

CONTACT

[email protected]

0041 56 486 3083

About this study

Background: Continuous bladder irrigation (CBI) is the current standard management for haematuria, but can delay diagnostic cystoscopy. Gas-based cystoscopy may allow earlier and clearer visualisation of the bladder mucosa.

Design: Prospective, randomised (1:1), controlled, parallel-group, open-label, single-centre superiority trial. Randomisation is stratified by haematuria grade and history of transurethral resection (TUR-B/P), using REDCap.

Intervention: Index cystoscopy with either air (up to 240 ml by syringe) or saline (up to 240 ml by syringe), according to randomisation. A second cystoscopy with the alternative medium follows immediately, exclusively to ensure no diagnostic disadvantage for the patient (results not analysed).

Sample size: N=40 (20 per arm), based on detection rates of 86% (air) vs. 38% (saline), two-sided α=0.05, 80% power, with 20% attrition allowance.

Statistics: Chi-square test (Fisher's exact test) for the primary endpoint; risk ratio and risk difference with 95% CI reported.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Persistent macroscopic haematuria Grade III-V within 48 hours after hospitalisation
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Unexplained macroscopic haematuria requiring diagnostic cystoscopy
  • Ability to give written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Haemodynamic instability or urgent need for operative or interventional cystoscopy (requiring cystoscopy within < 24 hours of screening)
  • Ureteral stent in situ
  • Active urinary tract infection
  • Transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) or prostate (TURP) within the last 6 weeks

Treatment and study plan

Air-based flexible cystoscopy

Procedure

Flexible cystoscopy with manual air insufflation (up to 240 ml) via bladder syringe for bladder distension and visualisation.

Saline-based flexible cystoscopy

Procedure

Flexible cystoscopy with manual saline irrigation (up to 240 ml, 0.9% NaCl) via bladder syringe for bladder distension and visualisation.

Primary outcomes

  1. Identification of the underlying cause of macroscopic haematuria during the index cystoscopy

    Time frame: Immediately after completion of the index cystoscopy (intraoperative)

    Binary outcome (yes/no). Assessed in real time by the operating urologist during the index procedure and documented immediately after completion. 'Yes' if a specific bleeding source (e.g., tumour, prostate bleeding, stone, vascular lesion) is identified; 'No' otherwise.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to source identification

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    Minutes from insertion of the cystoscope to first identification of the bleeding source during the index cystoscopy.

  2. Total procedure duration

    Time frame: Intraoperative

    Minutes from insertion to removal of the cystoscope during the index cystoscopy.

  3. Urologist-rated visibility

    Time frame: Immediately after index cystoscopy

    5-point Likert scale (1 = very poor to 5 = excellent), completed by the operating urologist immediately after the index cystoscopy.

  4. Patient comfort

    Time frame: Immediately after index cystoscopy

    Description: 5-point Likert scale (1 = very uncomfortable to 5 = very comfortable), completed by the patient immediately after the index cystoscopy.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Lasse Petersen, Dr. med. univ.

CONTACT

[email protected]

+41 56 486 3083

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Kantonsspital Baden

Other

Registry information

Official study title

AIROSCOPY - A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Single-Centre Superiority Study Comparing Air-Based Versus Saline-Based Flexible Cystoscopy for the Identification of the Bleeding Source in Patients With Macroscopic Haematuria

Acronym: AIROSCOPY

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Jun 1, 2026
Registry last updated
Jun 3, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.