Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06638866

AI-powered Early Detection for Pancreatic Cancer Via Non-contrast CT in Opportunistic Screening Cohort

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains a therapeutic challenge with 5-year survival rates of 13%, primarily attributable to advanced-stage diagnosis (AJCC Stage III/IV in >80% of cases). This prospective, observational, multi-center study will evaluate the performance of an AI-powered opportunistic screening system utilizing non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) acquired during routine clinical encounters or health check-ups. The proposed AI model will perform automated detection of pancreatic parenchymal abnormalities, including PDAC and precursor lesions (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms [IPMN], mucinous cystic neoplasms [MCN]). Algorithm-positive cases will be independently reviewed by two radiologists. Highly suspected individuals will undergo further diagnostic verification, including serological tests and multimodal imaging confirmation. Patients with confirmed positive diagnosis will receive multidisciplinary consultation and specialized treatment, whereas those with negative results will undergo at least one-year clinical follow-up. This study will quantitatively evaluate the AI system's performance, and aims to advance PDAC early detection, improve patient outcomes, and make it accessible in underserved populations.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Loading trial locations.

About this study

PDAC is projected to become the second-leading cause of cancer mortality by 2030, with stage-specific survival disparities reaching 83.7% for stage IA versus 2.9% for stage IV disease. This dramatic survival gradient highlights the transformative potential of stage migration through early detection.

Screening-based early detection has demonstrated improved prognosis for PDAC patients; however, implementation faces dual challenges. he low incidence of PDAC renders population-wide screening cost-ineffective, while current screening methods are hampered by high false-positive rates and overdiagnosis risks. In this context, opportunistic screening has garnered attention for its unique implementation advantages. By leveraging existing imaging resources from routine clinical encounters or health check-ups, this approach obviates the need for additional screening infrastructure, potentially reducing healthcare resource consumption while effectively increasing screening coverage among high-risk populations.

Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT), despite its widespread clinical application and operational convenience, is limited by suboptimal soft tissue resolution, resulting in insufficient sensitivity for early pancreatic lesions (≤2 cm), thus significantly constraining its utility in opportunistic screening. Recent advancements in AI technology have significantly impacted the field of medical image analysis. These techniques have enabled the automation of the detection of subtle pancreatic lesion features in large-scale imaging data, with the potential to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of early pancreatic cancer detection. In preliminary research, a deep learning-based model for pancreatic cancer detection was developed by our team. This model demonstrated the ability to accurately detect and classify pancreatic lesions on NCCT images, with excellent performance in multicenter validation studies. The model also exhibited strong generalizability when applied to chest CT scans. Therefore, AI-powered NCCT shows significant potential for application in hospital-based opportunistic screening programs and may become an effective tool for early pancreatic cancer detection. However, further research is required to fully explore and realize this potential.

This prospective, observational, multi-center study will evaluate the performance of an AI-powered opportunistic screening system utilizing NCCT acquired during routine clinical encounters or health check-ups. The deep learning-based detection system will perform automated identification of pancreatic lesions, including PDAC and precursor entities (intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms [IPMN], mucinous cystic neoplasms [MCN]). Algorithm-positive cases will be independently reviewed by two radiologists. Individuals with high suspicion after radiologists review will undergo further validation via serological tests (e.g., CA19-9, CEA) and imaging studies (e.g., contrast-enhanced CT, contrast-enhanced MRI, EUS-FNA). Participants with a confirmed positive diagnosis will undergo multidisciplinary consultation and specialized treatment, while those with a negative diagnosis will be followed clinically for at least one year.

The AI system's performance will be evaluated through three primary metrics: (1) Detection rate of PDAC and high-risk precursor lesions, defined as the proportion of histologically confirmed PDAC and precursor lesions (IPMN/MCN) meeting Sendai criteria among all participants undergoing CT screening. (2) Recall rate, defined as the proportion of individuals recalled for confirmatory testing after AI-positive screening and radiologist review among all participants undergoing CT screening. (3) Positive predictive value (PPV) defined as the proportion of histologically confirmed PDAC and high-risk precursor lesions among all AI-positive screening cases.

Institutional Collaboration: Led by Shanghai Changhai Hospital (PI: Gang Jin, MD) with five regional centers (Yinzhou Hospital, Jiaxing University Hospital, Lishui Central Hospital, Jingning County Hospital) and Alibaba DAMO Academy (technical support).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals undergoing routine non-contrast chest and/or abdominal CT scans for non-pancreatic indications.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of pancreatic cancer;
  • History of thoracic or abdominal surgery;
  • Acute pancreatitis within 6 months;
  • Patients referred for evaluation of suspected or confirmed pancreatic cancer.

Treatment and study plan

PDAC

Diagnostic Test

Participants with algorithm-identified PDAC will be independently reviewed by two radiologists. Those highly suspected will be recalled for further diagnostic evaluation, including serological tests (e.g., CA19-9, CEA) and imaging (e.g., contrast-enhanced CT/MRI, EUS-FNA). Participants with a confirmed positive diagnosis will undergo multidisciplinary consultation and specialized treatment, while those with a negative diagnosis will be followed clinically for at least one year.

Pancreatic precursor lesions

Diagnostic Test

Participants with algorithm-identified pancreatic precursor lesions will be independently reviewed by two radiologists. Those highly suspected will be recalled for further diagnostic evaluation, including serological tests (e.g., CA19-9, CEA) and imaging (e.g., contrast-enhanced CT/MRI, EUS-FNA). Participants with a confirmed positive diagnosis will undergo multidisciplinary consultation and specialized treatment, while those with a negative diagnosis will be followed clinically for at least one year.

Primary outcomes

  1. Detection rate of PDAC

    Time frame: 3 years

    Defined as the proportion of histologically confirmed PDAC among all participants undergoing CT screening.

  2. Detection rate of high-risk precursor lesions

    Time frame: 3 years

    Defined as the proportion of histologically confirmed precursor lesions (IPMN/MCN) meeting Sendai criteria among all participants undergoing CT screening.

  3. PPV

    Time frame: 3 years

    Defined as the proportion of histologically confirmed PDAC and high-risk precursor lesions among all AI-positive screening cases.

  4. Recall rate

    Time frame: 3 years

    Defined as the proportion of individuals recalled for further validation via serological and imaging tests after AI-positive screening and radiologist review among all participants undergoing CT screening.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Early-stage PDAC Proportion

    Time frame: 3 years

    Defined as the proportion of histologically confirmed early-stage PDAC among all PDAC cases detected through CT screening.

  2. Survival time

    Time frame: 5 years

    Defined as the survival time of patients with PDAC or precursor lesions detected through screening.

Other outcomes

  1. Potential harms associated with screening procedures and treatments

    Time frame: 3 years

    Defined as the potential adverse effects associated with screening procedures (e.g., contrast-enhanced CT/MRI, EUS-FNA) and treatments (e.g., postoperative complications).

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Guo Shi Wei, M.D.

CONTACT

[email protected]

86-18621500666

Wang Bei Lei, M.D.

CONTACT

[email protected]

86-13774238083

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Changhai Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Alibaba DAMO Academy
  • Central Hospital of Lishui City
  • Jingning County People's Hospital
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University
  • Yinzhou Hospital Affiliated to Medical School of Ningbo University

Registry information

Official study title

Artificial Intelligence-based Health Information Management System and Key Technology Study of Early Screening and Hierarchical Diagnosis and Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer

Acronym: AI-PANC

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2030
First posted
Oct 15, 2024
Registry last updated
Mar 19, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.