AI model
OtherDoctors in this group are required to use the AI model to assist their diagnoses. The AI pathology model will provide a predicted result for each case.
NCT Number: NCT07408167
The investigators plan to conduct a multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial to systematically evaluate the incremental value of pathology-based artificial intelligence (AI) models in a pan-disease diagnostic workflow. The study will primarily compare interpretation using an AI-assisted platform with conventional independent slide reading in terms of diagnostic accuracy (e.g., AUC), reading efficiency (e.g., diagnostic time), diagnostic report quality, diagnostic confidence (Likert scale), and pathologists' satisfaction with the AI model. Investigators will also assess superiority among less experienced (junior) pathologists and non-inferiority among more experienced (senior) pathologists. Successful completion of this project will provide high-level prospective evidence to support standardized deployment, quality control, and broader implementation of pathology AI in clinical practice. This trial may also evaluate the potential benefits and risks of using AI tools in medical research.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year–100 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The First Hospital Affiliated to AMU SOUTHWEST HOSPITAL, Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, China
In this study, investigators plan to enroll 60 pathologists with varying levels of experience and 2,000 patients requiring pathological diagnosis, with whole-slide images (WSIs) collected.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Pathologists:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Patients:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Doctors in this group are required to use the AI model to assist their diagnoses. The AI pathology model will provide a predicted result for each case.
Pathologists will independently diagnose each case based on their own clinical experience, and will record both their time to diagnosis and their diagnostic confidence.
Time frame: Assessments will be conducted within one week after the pathologists' diagnoses
Area under the curve
Time frame: Measured immediately after the pathologists' diagnosis
Time required for the pathologist to complete the diagnosis of each case in the AI-assisted diagnosis group compared with the independent diagnosis group. Diagnostic time is defined as the duration (in minutes/seconds) from initiating case review to finalizing and submitting the diagnostic report in the study system.
Time frame: At the time of diagnosis for each case.
Self-reported diagnostic confidence of pathologists for each case in the AI-assisted diagnosis group compared with the independent diagnosis group. Diagnostic confidence will be rated by the reporting pathologist on a [10]-point Likert scale (e.g., 1 = very uncertain to 10 = very confident) immediately after completing the diagnosis. Higher scores indicate greater diagnostic confidence.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Other
Performance of AI Models in the Clinical Pathology Diagnostic Workflow: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07291362
Pathology Foundation Model
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial Details