Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04589988

Aging With Long Term Physical Disabilities

The purpose of this study is to determine the feasibility and efficacy of an adapted evidence-based program (REBIL) to reduce barriers to community participation and remove fall hazards at home for adults aging with physical disabilities.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

45 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, 63108, United States

About this study

Investigators will test the working hypothesis that the adapted program, focused on resolving environmental barriers, removing fall hazards, and building self-management skills in the home and community, will be feasible and superior to usual care for daily activity performance and participation outcomes in adults aging with physical disabilities.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 45-65 years
  • Self-report of difficulty with at least 2 daily activities using the Older Adult Retirement Survey Activities of Daily Living (OARS ADL) scale
  • onset of a physical disability 5 years prior to participation (e.g., spinal cord injury (SCI), cerebral palsy, post-polio syndrome, stroke, amputation).
  • live within 60 miles of the research lab

Exclusion criteria

  • Currently institutionalized.

Treatment and study plan

Removing Environmental Barriers to Independent Living (REBIL)

Behavioral

REBIL is a complex intervention with two essential components: (1) removing environmental barriers and home hazards in the home tailored to the participant's unique abilities and limitations and (2) strategy training with the participant to help participant to be able to identify barriers in the home and community and identify potential resources and strategies to remove the barriers. Treatment includes one assessment session and four 75-minute visits in the home with an occupational therapist over 8 weeks, followed by a 6 -month assessment session by a blinded rater.

Waitlist Attentional Control

Behavioral

The waitlist attentional control group will receive an initial assessment session then four 75 minute interview visits from an occupational therapy graduate assistant, followed by a 6-month assessment session by a blinded rater. After the 6-month follow-up is completed this group will receive the REBIL intervention.

Primary outcomes

  1. In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) Activity Score

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-month follow up

    The In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) activity score measures current activity patterns of participants across 44 activities. The score ranges from 0 to 1.0, with a higher score indicating fewer problematic activities for the participant.

  2. In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) Performance Score

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-month follow up

    The In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) performance score is a mean rating across up to 10 participant-prioritized activities on a scale of 1 (unable to perform the activity at all) to 5 (able to perform the activity without difficulty).

  3. In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) Satisfaction Score

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-month follow up

    The In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) satisfaction score is a mean rating across up to 10 participant-prioritized activities on a scale of 1 (not satisfied at all with the performance of the activity) to 5 (very satisfied with their performance of the activity).

  4. In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) Barrier Severity Score

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-month follow up

    The In-Home Occupational Performance Evaluation (I-HOPE) barrier severity score is a total sum of barrier ratings (0=independent with/without a device, 1=stand-by assistance needed, 2=minimum assistance needed, 3=moderate assistance needed, 4=maximum assistance needed, 5=no activity) for all identified barriers across up to 10 prioritized activities. Multiple barriers could be identified for each prioritized activity. Higher scores indicate greater barrier severity. There is no maximum score.

  5. Reintegration to Normal Living Index (RNLI)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-month follow-up

    The Reintegration to Normal Living Index is a disability-related quality-of life-instrument that will be used to measure participants' satisfaction with their home and community participation and has been validated on a population of community-dwelling individuals with chronic conditions. It uses an 11-item, 10 point visual analog scale with higher scores indicating greater reintegration to normal living. The sum score is divided by 110 and then multiplied by 100 to obtain an adjusted score. Adjusted scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater reintegration to normal living.

  6. Westmead Home Safety Assessment (WeHSA) Short Form

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-month follow up

    The Westmead Home Safety Assessment (WeHSA) short form is a performance-based assessment of fall hazards in different spaces of the home (e.g., kitchen, bathroom, hallway, bedroom etc.). WeSHA scores indicate the total number of environmental fall hazards in the home.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fall Prevention Strategy Survey (FPSS)

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-month follow-up

    The Fall Prevention Strategy Survey is a self-report instrument addressing protective behaviors related to fall risk among adults. It is an 11-item survey, scores range from 0 to 22 with higher scores indicating use of more fall prevention strategies.

  2. Participation Scale

    Time frame: Baseline and 6-month follow-up

    This scale comprises 25 diverse activities across four participation domains: routines, recreation, responsibilities, and relationships. Ratings were on a five-point Likert-type scale regarding the frequency of participation, the importance of the activity, and their self-efficacy in completing it. We calculated the ratio of number of important/very important activities they could perform very much/as much as they wanted (numerator) to the number of important/very important activities (denominator).

  3. Fall Rate

    Time frame: 6 months

    Participants reported monthly on the number of falls they experienced in the past month. A fall was defined as an unexpected event in which a person comes to rest on the ground, floor, or a lower level. Fall rates were calculated as the number of falls per 1000 observed participant days.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Washington University School of Medicine

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research

Registry information

Official study title

Building Capacity to Improve Community Participation for People Aging With Long-Term Disability Through Evidence-Based Strategies

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Oct 19, 2020
Registry last updated
Aug 27, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.