Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University Medicine Faculty
Zonguldak, Kozlu, 67600, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT05404269
The aim of this study was to compare the AGC mode and manually controlled minimal-flow anesthesia for volatile anesthetic consumption, hemodynamic parameters, and recovery from anesthesia
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–65 year
Female
Observational
Zonguldak, Kozlu, 67600, Turkey (Türkiye)
Modern anesthesia machines use circular systems in which ventilated gas re-circulates to a certain degree and is therefore reused, preserving temperature, and humidity. The rebreathing fraction is increased by a reduction in fresh gas flow, which leads to a considerable decrease in consumption of fresh gas and volatile anesthetics, resulting in reductions in cost and atmospheric pollution. In a closed ventilation system, only the patient's requirements for oxygen and anesthetic agents are supplemented. A fresh gas flow-rate of 0.5 l/min is defined as the minimal-flow technique. The oxygen and anesthetic gas titration can be manually controlled by the anesthetist. To assure safe and appropriate anesthesia, manually controlled anesthesia requires constant monitoring and numerous adjustments to the gas dosage by the anesthetist, especially for low- and minimalflow anesthesia. Oxygen flow and volatile anesthetics can also be automatically controlled by anesthesia machines using end-tidal control (such as AGC mode of Maquet FLOW-i anesthesia machine), which ensures constant end-tidal concentration of oxygen and anesthetic gas via feedback and continuous automatic adjustment mechanisms. Anesthesiologists needing to make fewer interventions during a case may have clinical importance in terms of distraction, record keeping and patient safety. In addition to this advantage, we wanted to compare the AGC mode and manually controlled minimal-flow anesthesia for volatile anesthetic consumption, hemodynamic parameters, and recovery from anesthesia.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Automated Gas Control mode at Maquet FLOW-i anesthesia machine
Time frame: during the surgery
Difference of Sevoflurane Consumption between the groups
Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University
Other
Comparison of AGC (Automatic Gas Control) Mode and Manually Controlled Minimal Flow Anesthesia in Breast Surgery
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05533099
Breast Diseases, Skin Diseases
Pisa, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT03709446
Breast Diseases, Breast Neoplasms
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03730051
Breast Diseases, Skin Diseases
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06187350
Artificial Intelligence, Breast Diseases
Linköping, Östergötland County, Sweden
View Trial Details