Family Check-Up 4 Health
BehavioralA parent-training intervention to improve child health, school readiness and manage obesity.
Other names: FCU4Health
NCT Number: NCT04469816
This study is a hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial of the Family Check-Up 4 Health (FCU4Health), an adapted version of the Family Check-Up, in pediatric primary care. Patients will be recruited based on their age (2-5 years old) and randomized to receive the intervention, FCU4Health, or services as usual. All families will be assessed annually over three years.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me2 year–5 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Avondale School District, Avondale, Arizona, United States
The FCU4Health is an assessment-driven, Motivational Interviewing (MI) based, parent training program. Parents complete a comprehensive assessment, including questionnaire of the family environment, parenting skills, and child adjustment and health behaviors, and additional observation data. The FCU4Health coordinator reviews the assessment results with the parents, using MI strategies to engage families in making change to support child behavioral health, and to create tailored follow-up services which include parent training modules and referrals to additional support services in the community.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A parent-training intervention to improve child health, school readiness and manage obesity.
Other names: FCU4Health
Services/Treatment as usual.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of family mealtime routines over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Family Mealtime Routines. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 20. Where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of child food and beverage choices over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Child Food and Beverage Choices. Food Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 24. Where higher food scores mean a better outcome and higher beverage scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of child eating behaviors over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Child Eating Behaviors. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 20. Where higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of child conduct problems over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Conduct Problems. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 2. Where higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of child effortful control over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Effortful Control. Minimum Value: 1. Maximum Value: 5. Where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of prosocial behavior over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Prosocial Behavior. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 2. Where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of emotional problems over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Emotional Problems. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 2. Where higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of child sleep routines over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Sleep Routines. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 24. Where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of child media routines over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Media Routines. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 24. Where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of child physical activity habits over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Child Physical Activity Habits. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 24. Where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of parenting warmth over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Parenting Warmth. Minimum Value: 1. Maximum Value: 25. Where higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of family conflict over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Family Conflict. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 6. Where higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of parent child conflict over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Parent Child Conflict. Minimum Value: 1. Maximum Value: 25. Where higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of parent depression over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Depression. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 80. Where higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of parenting stress over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Parenting Stress. Minimum Value: 1. Maximum Value: 4. Where higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of parent substance use over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Parent Substance Use. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 1. Where higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of incentive and encouragement over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Incentive and Encouragement. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 4. Where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of proactive parenting over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Proactive Parenting. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 4. Where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Time frame: The investigators will examine trajectories of parent limit setting over 3 annual assessments (baseline, 1-year, 2-year follow-up).
Limit Setting. Minimum Value: 0. Maximum Value: 4. Where higher scores mean a better outcome.
Arizona State University
Other
The Family Check-Up for Health: A Family-Centered Health Maintenance Approach to Improve Nutrition and Prevent Obesity in Early Childhood
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05628155
Atrophy, Clinical Trial
Rennes, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07550751
Clinical Trial
Aswān, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07081529
Clinical Trial, Dental Caries
View Trial DetailsNCT07017296
Clinical Trial
Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico
View Trial Details