LGBTQ-affirmative CBT
Behavioral16-session LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy using cognitive behavioral techniques
NCT Number: NCT05766592
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy of an LGBTQ-affirmative individual cognitive behavioral psychotherapy (CBT) and LGBTQ-affirmative family therapy (attachment-based family therapy for sexual and gender minority young adults; ABFT-SGM) delivered via telehealth to a sample of sexual and gender minority adults with nonaccepting parent(s) in New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, and Israel. The investigators will assess whether both treatments are associated with significant decreases in depressive and anxiety symptoms. The investigators will also assess whether and how each treatment achieves reductions in mental health symptoms through specific mechanisms (e.g., rejection sensitivity, internalized stigma, emotion dysregulation, parental rejection and acceptance).
Interested in participating?
Request Info20 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Ben-Gurion University Psychotherapy Research Lab, Beersheba, Israel
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and purported change mechanisms in an LGBTQ-affirmative individual cognitive behavioral psychotherapy (CBT) and LGBTQ-affirmative family therapy (attachment-based family therapy for sexual and gender minority young adults; ABFT-SGM) delivered via telehealth to a sample of sexual and gender minority adults in New York, Pennsylvania, Connecticut, and Israel. In this 2-arm randomized clinical trial (RCT), participants will receive 16 weekly sessions of either LGBTQ-affirmative CBT or ABFT-SGM. Investigators will assess whether both treatments are associated with significant decreases in depressive and anxiety symptoms. Investigators will also assess whether psychosocial mechanisms (e.g., rejection sensitivity, internalized stigma, emotion dysregulation, parental rejection and acceptance) mediate reductions in psychological symptoms, and whether such mediators differ between the two treatments. Finally, investigators will assess whether participants who begin treatment with higher levels of parental rejection benefit more from ABFT-SGM than from LGBTQ-affirmative CBT, and whether participants with higher initial levels of maladaptive stress responses benefit more from LGBTQ-affirmative CBT.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
16-session LGBTQ-affirmative psychotherapy using cognitive behavioral techniques
16-session attachment-based family therapy for sexual and gender minority young adults and their nonaccepting parents
Time frame: Baseline, Immediate Post-intervention, 5-month Post-intervention
Depressive symptoms will be measured using the 21-item Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI). Items are rated on a scale from 0-3 where higher scores indicate greater depression symptoms, with a maximum score of 63.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediate Post-intervention, 5-month Post-intervention
Anxiety symptoms will be measured using the 21-item Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI). Items are rated on a scale from 0-3 where higher scores indicate greater anxiety symptoms, with a maximum score of 63.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediate Post-intervention, 5-month Post-intervention
Suicidal ideation will be measured using a single item from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. This item is rated from 0-3, where a higher score indicates higher suicidal ideation.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediate Post-intervention, 5-month Post-intervention
Motivation to conceal sexual orientation and gender modality will be assessed using the Concealment Motivation subscale of the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale (LGBIS). The three subscale items, rated on a 6-point scale, will be averaged for a maximum total score of 6. Higher scores indicate higher concealment motivation.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediate Post-intervention, 5-month Post-intervention
Acceptance concerns of sexual minority identity and gender identity will be assessed using the Acceptance Concerns subscale of the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale (LGBIS). The three subscale items, rated on a 6-point scale, will be averaged for a maximum total score of 6. Higher scores indicate higher acceptance concerns.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediate Post-intervention, 5-month Post-intervention
Change in explicit internalized stigma will be assessed using the Internalized Homonegativity subscale of the Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Identity Scale (LGBIS). The three subscale items, rated on a 6-point scale, will be averaged for a maximum total score of 6. Higher scores indicate higher acceptance concerns.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediate Post-intervention, 5-month Post-intervention
Emotion dysregulation will be assessed using the 18-item Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Short Form (DERS-SF). Items are rated on a 5-point scale from 1-5; items 1, 4, and 6 are reverse coded. Items are averaged for a total maximum score of 5, where higher scores indicate higher emotion dysregulation.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediate Post-intervention
Implicit bias related to sexual orientation will be measured using the sexual orientation Implicit Association Test. Scores range from -2 to 2, where higher scores indicate higher implicit preference towards heterosexuality.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediate Post-intervention, 5-month Post-intervention
Parental acceptance will be measured by the Parental Acceptance subscale of the Parental Acceptance and Rejection of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Scale (PARSOS). 15 items are rated on a 5-point scale from 1-5. Items are averaged for a maximum total score of 5, indicating higher parental acceptance.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediate Post-intervention, 5-month Post-intervention
Parental rejection will be measured by the Parental Rejection subscale of the Parental Acceptance and Rejection of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Scale (PARSOS). 13 items are rated on a 5-point scale from 1-5. Items are averaged for a maximum total score of 5, indicating higher parental rejection.
Time frame: Baseline, Immediate Post-intervention, 5-month Post-intervention
Quality of attachment relationship will be assessed using the Experience in Close Relationships-Relationship Structures Questionnaire (ECR-RS). 9 items are rated on a scale from 1-7 and averaged for a total maximum score of 7, indicating a higher quality of attachment relationship.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Danielle M Chiaramonte, PhD
CONTACT
John E Pachankis, PhD
CONTACT
Yale University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06417918
Adolescent - Emotional Problem, Adolescent Problem Behavior
Eldoret, Kenya
View Trial DetailsNCT06366438
Adolescent Behavior, Adolescent Development
Bromma, Sweden
View Trial DetailsNCT05554458
Child Mental Disorder, Eating Disorders
Prague, Czech Republic, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT04257331
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child Abuse
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial Details