Gerencia de atención primaria
Madrid, 28035, Spain
NCT Number: NCT05681065
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of the TeNDER tool compared to usual practice in improving Quality of Life in patients with chronic diseases, according to type of disease and gender.
Methodology:
Design: randomised, open-label, multicentre, parallel-group clinical trial with 2-month follow-up.
Setting: health centres, homes, hospitals, socio-health centres and patient associations belonging to the participating countries.
Population: Patients with chronic diseases such as Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease or other dementias (AD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD); their caregivers and social-health professionals will be studied.
Sample size: n= 1,766 patients (1031 control/735 intervention).
Variables: The main outcome variable is the change in patient quality of life Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). In addition, sociodemographic variables, technological affinity, usability, satisfaction and potential reductions in visits to health services after the intervention were collected in all study subjects. The change in patient autonomy after the intervention, the change in caregiver satisfaction with the care provided and the change in work overload in professionals were also studied.
Analysis: A descriptive analysis will be performed, a comparison of groups will be made at T1, a mean difference of global QoL and by dimensions will be calculated at T2 with its 95% Confident Interval (CI). For the main outcome, a multilevel linear regression model will be used with the dependent variable being the Quality of Life score at 60 days (T2) and the independent variable the group to which it belongs (control / TENDER) adjusted for possible confounding variables and/or effect modifiers. One model will be fitted for men and one for women. An intention-to-treat analysis will be performed.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Madrid, 28035, Spain
Hypothesis and Objective
Operational hypothesis: The use of the TeNDER tool by patients with chronic diseases increases their Quality of Life, as measured by the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36), by at least 6 points, compared to usual practice.
Primary Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of the TeNDER tool compared to usual practice in improving Quality of Life in patients with chronic diseases.
Secondary objectives:
Methodology
Design: randomised, open-label, multicentre, parallel-group clinical trial with 2-month follow-up.
Patients in the intervention group will be fitted with the TeNDER system device best suited to the patient's needs, in addition to routine clinical practice. Patients in the control group will be treated according to standard clinical practice.
Sample size. The European consortium has proposed a sample size of 1766 patients (1031 in the Control Group and 735 in the Intervention Group). Those responsible for the technological development have considered that the tool will allow an improvement in Quality of Life (QoL) measured with the Short Form-36 Health Survey questionnaire of 6 points between the groups. According to previous studies consulted, the standard deviation of QoL in the population with the chronic diseases under study (PD, AD and CVD) varies between 16 and 27 [23-25]. For the power calculation, we have used the highest value of this standard deviation. Therefore, this sample size will allow a power of 98.8% to detect ≥6 differences in the overall score of the Short Form-36 Health Survey questionnaire if they exist.
The calculations were performed using a freely available software developed by public institutions for epidemiologists and other health professionals for the management of tabulated data.
In Primary Care of the Madrid Health Service, 534 patients will be included (380 in the Intervention Group and 254 in the Control Group). By pathology they will be: 80 patients with PD, 100 patients with AD and 360 patients with CVD.
Recruitment:
In each institution of the consortium, recruitment will be carried out according to its internal organisation.
For the Madrid Health Service institution, it is defined below:
Selection of centres and professionals: In Primary Care in Madrid, 5 health centres have been selected, including a total of 187 professionals (doctors and nurses) who will be offered to participate in the study. Based on experience in previous studies, we expect a participation rate of 45%, which means 84 participating professionals. If necessary, the number of participating centres will be expanded to reach the required sample size of patients and professionals.
Professionals will enter the study on a voluntary basis and after signing an informed consent form.
Recruitment of patients and carers:
Each participating professional will recruit 8 patients from their quota (5 with CVD, 1 with PD and 2 with AD). Recruitment will be done consecutively. Patients with some degree of dependence (PD and AD) will be recruited together with the caregiver, with the prior informed consent of both.
Participants must sign the informed consent before being included in the study. For this purpose, during the recruitment interview, the professionals will provide all the information about the study in written form and accompanied by a detailed verbal explanation, making sure that they understand it. You will be offered the information sheet to take home and share it with the people you consider important for the decision, at the same time as you will be offered the resolution of any doubts that may arise.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
The main study population is patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease or other dementias (AD) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Data will also be collected from their caregivers and professionals.
PATIENTS:
General Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion criteria
for disease:
General Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria
for disease:
CAREGIVERS:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
PROFESSIONALS:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The TeNDER intervention consists of the use of the TeNDER technological tool. It is a web application that integrates all the functionalities of biosensors to facilitate patient self-monitoring, caregiver care and monitoring and management in the daily work of healthcare professionals. Each participant will use the sensor that suits their needs:
Sleep quality detector; Position sensor; Smart band; Smart watch; Microphone and speaker; rgb (real sense) sensor; Binary door and window sensor; Environmental sensor.
Time frame: baseline and 1 month after intervention
Quality of life will be measured at baseline and at the end of the TeNDER intervention (after 1 month) and the change between the two measures will be studied.
Health-related quality of life as measured by the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). This questionnaire contains 36 items and 8 dimensions: Physical Function (10); Physical Role (4); Bodily Pain (2); General Health (5); Vitality (4); Social Function (2); Emotional Role (3) and 2 summary components (Physical and Mental).
The score ranges from 0 to 100, where the higher the score the better the health status.
Time frame: baseline
Gender (male or female), age (number)
Time frame: baseline
Main disease shall be recorded as AD (Alzheimer disease, ) PD (Parkinson disease) and CVD (cardiovascular disease)
Time frame: baseline
This information is collected with a question about their taste for using technology and 6 different levels of response are offered.
Time frame: baseline and 1 month after intervention
The difference in autonomy between baseline and after the intervention (1 month after) will be studied. Autonomy at each time point will be studied by means of 6 ad hoc likert-type questions scored 4-0. Where 24 is total autonomy and 0 is no autonomy.
Time frame: 1 month after intervention
Collected through the validated tool "System Usability Scale". This scale is composed of 10 questions related to satisfaction with usability. The overall score is calculated from the sum of all item scores multiplied by 2.5, and the overall score ranges from 0 to 100.
Time frame: 1 month after intervention
Satisfaction with the intervention. This will be studied by means of 4 ad hoc likert-type questions scored 1-5. Where 20 is the highest satisfaction with the tool.
Time frame: 1 month after intervention
Through 3 questions, the opinion on the potential of the tool to reduce visits to health services is collected.
Time frame: baseline
Gender (male or female), age (number)
Time frame: baseline
This information is collected with a question about their taste for using technology and 6 different levels of response are offered.
Time frame: baseline
Main disease of the person being cared for. This shall be recorded as AD (Alzheimer disease, ) PD (Parkinson disease) and CVD (cardiovascular disease)
Time frame: baseline and 1 month after intervention
It will be collected through 11 ad hoc questions focused on the carer. It will be collected at baseline and 1 month after the intervention and the change will be studied.
Time frame: baseline and 1 month after intervention
By means of a question with different levels of response. It will be collected at baseline and 1 month after the intervention and the change will be studied.
Time frame: 1 month after intervention
Collected through the validated tool "System Usability Scale". This scale is composed of 10 questions related to satisfaction with usability. The overall score is calculated from the sum of all item scores multiplied by 2.5, and the overall score ranges from 0 to 100.
Time frame: 1 month after intervention
Satisfaction with the intervention. This will be studied by means of 4 ad hoc likert-type questions scored 1-5. Where 20 is the highest satisfaction with the tool.
Time frame: 1 month after intervention
Through 3 questions, the opinion on the potential of the tool to reduce visits to health services is collected.
Time frame: baseline
Gender (male or female), age (number)
Time frame: baseline
This information is collected with a question about their taste for using technology and 6 different levels of response are offered.
Time frame: baseline and 1 month after intervention
By means of a question with different levels of response. It will be collected at baseline and 1 month after the intervention and the change will be studied.
Time frame: 1 month after intervention
Collected through the validated tool "System Usability Scale". This scale is composed of 10 questions related to satisfaction with usability. The overall score is calculated from the sum of all item scores multiplied by 2.5, and the overall score ranges from 0 to 100.
Time frame: 1 month after intervention
Satisfaction with the intervention. This will be studied by means of 4 ad hoc likert-type questions scored 1-5. Where 20 is the highest satisfaction with the tool.
Time frame: 1 month after intervention
Through 3 questions, the opinion on the potential of the tool to reduce visits to health services is collected.
Gerencia de Atención Primaria, Madrid
Other Gov
Affective Based Integrated Care for Better Quality of Life (TeNDER).Pilot Implementation. Site 1: Primary Care Madrid, Spain.
Acronym: TeNDER_Site1
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06916247
Chronic Disease, Disease Attributes
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03195127
Chronic Disease, Critical Illness
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05574699
Cardiovascular Diseases, Chronic Disease
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04264897
Aging, Chronic Disease
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
View Trial Details