Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Endoprosthetics
Cheboksary, Chuvashskaya Respublika, 429500, Russia
NCT Number: NCT05291130
Objectives of this study is evaluate effectivness of AESCULAP® Plasmafit® Plasmafit Cementless Acetabular System With Vitelene® Vitamin E Stabilized Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene compare to the sane sistem without Vitamin E, and ceramic or metal femoral heads
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–55 year
All sexes
Observational
Cheboksary, Chuvashskaya Respublika, 429500, Russia
Osteoarthritis is one most common disease in aged population, that most advanced stage needs surgical treatment. Surgical treatment usually include installation of implants. Every year new types of implants were fabricated from the new material. The effectiveness of this new devices need carefully independent assess in clinic.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
-
Plasmafit® Acetabular Cup System with an insert Aesculap ® Vitelene ® Vitamin E Stabilized Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene and BIOLOX delta Ceramic Femoral Head or ISODUR® Metal Femoral Heads
Other names: Plasmafit® Acetabular Cup System, BIOLOX delta Ceramic Femoral Head, ISODUR® Metal Femoral Heads
Time frame: 3 year follow-up
The HHS is a measure of dysfunction of the hip joint. Consist of 10 items in 3 sections. Score <70 = poor result; 70-80 = fair, 80-90 = good, and 90-100 = excellent.
Time frame: 3 year follow-up
The KSS is a measure of dysfunction of the knee joint. The KSS has a two sections: "Knee Score" section (7 items) and a "Functional Score" section (3 items). Results can be interpreted with the following: 80-100 = excellent; score 70-79 = good; score 60-69 = fair; score <60 = poor.
Time frame: 3 year follow-up
FJS-12 shows how much did the patient forget their artificial joint. Consists of 12 items, each item is answered within a 5-point Likert scale, as follows: 0: never (0 p); almost never (1 p); seldom (2 p); sometimes (3 p); and mostly (4 p). The initial raw data were converted to a scale ranging from 0 to 100 (worst to best).
Time frame: 3 year follow-up
To measure pain intensity after surgery the patients choose the score on the 10 cm line scale with (VAS-P) rage from 0 ('no pain') to 10 (severe pain).
Time frame: 3 year follow-up
mRS was used scale for measuring the degree of disability or dependence in the daily activities after joint replacement, with the following response options: 0: No symptoms at all; 1: No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2: Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3: Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4: Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5: Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6: Dead
Time frame: 3 year follow-up
The assessment of quality of life using EQ-5D measure: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression based on a three-level version included "no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and unable to do/extreme".
Time frame: 3 year follow-up
Rentgenological results based on standing anteroposterior pelvic radiograph with assesment version, acetabular interclination, depth, height, stability of endoprosthesis components, signs of wear on the insert, presence of osteolysis zones. Installing additional locking screws, acetabular cup anteversion and inclination, limb length discrepancy after surgery.
Time frame: 3 year follow-up
Period of occurrence and type of complications are recorded
Time frame: 1 year follow-up
The incidence of revision, time interval and types of incidence - one or two steps
Time frame: 3 year follow-up
Measure of the value of health outcomes with using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey
Federal State Budgetary Organization, Federal Center for Traumatology, Orthopedics and Arthroplasty
Other
Evaluation Effectiveness of the Aesculap® Plasmafit Cementless Acetabular System in Combination With Vitelene® Polyethylene and Vitamin E Insert for Hip Arthroplasty
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02944448
Arthritis, Connective Tissue Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05357378
Arthritis, Avascular Necrosis of Hip
Miami, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07386561
Anxiety Disorders, Arthritis
Trzebnica, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, Poland
View Trial DetailsNCT04238143
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Valencia, California, United States
View Trial Details