University of Michigan, Michigan Medicine
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Deb Demski, MUP, MSW, CCRP
CONTACT
Devin L McCaslin, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Morley, MA
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07466589
The goal is to assess the potential benefit of stochastic galvanic vestibular stimulation (sGVS) in improving patient performance with respect to balance, gait, and/or overall vestibular function for individuals with known deficits in vestibular performance as a result of a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–55 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Deb Demski, MUP, MSW, CCRP
CONTACT
Devin L McCaslin, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Matthew Morley, MA
CONTACT
The VIPES system that delivers sGVS is a small wearable device that administers stimulation aiming to improve the function of a vestibular system that has been adversely affected by mild TBI, concussion. In particular VIPES is designed to provide stimulus comprising random noise in a low frequency band (0 to 5Hz maximum) below the level of perception by the subject. The VIPES system consists of the four electrodes (two behind each ear). The stimulator can deliver the stimulation in multiple directions and receive information about the amplitude delivered accounting for skin impedance. The Bertec Portable Essential's dual-balance plate balance system and the APDM Opal V2R sensor are used as reference measurement tools for assessing clinical performance.
The study to be completed is an N=32 single-arm clinical investigation, comprised of a within-subject crossover study designed to evaluate whether electrical stimulation delivered by a wearable vestibular system can improve functional performance on clinical balance and mobility assessments. All participants will complete both Timed Up and Go (TUG) and mCTSIB + COBALT performance tests under a series of stimulation conditions.
Each test session begins with a Baseline (no stimulation) trial, followed by four additional trials under different stimulation levels: 0mA (sham), 0.33mA, 0.67mA, and 1.0mA. The stimulation sequence is randomized after Baseline. Participants are blinded to stimulation level during all trials.
Participants will be recruited from the pool of patients treated at the University of Michigan - NeuroSport Clinic for mTBI. Upon passing pre-screening through chart review and via phone, interested individuals will be scheduled for a study visit that begins with obtained informed consent. Prior to beginning the testing procedures, enrolled participants will provide demographic information (age, sex/gender, race, ethnicity), have height measured, weight measured, and provide a detailed medical history, history of present illness, a list of current medications, as well as complete a post-concussion symptoms questionnaire.
The performance tests to be completed:
Tool: Bertec Portable Essential's dual-balance plate balance system
Rationale: mCTSIB is a balance test commonly used to evaluate individuals of all ages post-concussion. This test protocol assesses how well an individual uses sensory input when one or more sensory systems are compromised. This protocol is commonly used to evaluate individuals post-concussion to describe static balance ability.
The test will be performed for each sGVS amplitudes from 0mA (sham & baseline) to 1 mA at 0.33 mA increments. Two trials for each of the following conditions:
Tool: Bertec Portable Essential's dual-balance plate balance system
Rationale: COBALT is a balance test commonly used to evaluate individuals post-concussion. This test protocol places high demand on the visual and vestibular systems that is not provided by traditional balance tests. These higher demand conditions improve sensitivity in detecting balance dysfunction in those post-concussion.
The test will be performed for each sGVS currents from 0mA (sham & baseline) to 1 mA at 0.33 mA increments. Two trials for each of the following conditions/surfaces:
On Firm Surface:
On Foam Surface:
o Normal stance with head shake and eyes closed on foam. Performed with the foam pad placed on the balance plate with the same procedure and parameters as HS on firm surface described above.
Tool: Opal V2R Sensor
Rationale: TUG is a test used to assess an individual's functional balance. It requires appropriate static and dynamic balance system integration. TUG provides a measure of functional balance integration not provided from standing balance tasks.
The test will be performed for each GVS amplitudes from 0mA (sham & baseline) to 1 mA at 0.33 mA increments.
Participants take a break following the testing prior to repeating. Following completion of the study, participants are asked to completed a short System Usability Scale Questionnaire. The entire study visit is estimated to take about 120 minutes.
The overall aim of the study is to determine whether performance improves under active stimulation conditions when compared to sham trials. Results may inform optimal parameter selection for future efficacy-focused studies.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
No racial/ethnic groups will be excluded, although all participants must be fluent speakers of English.
Exclusion criteria
The investigational intervention is a non-invasive, wearable vestibular stimulation system that delivers subsensory electrical stimulation via surface electrodes behind the ears. Stimulation is delivered at one of four levels (0.33mA, 0.67mA, 1.0mA, and 0mA sham) during standard clinical balance and mobility assessments (TUG and BERTEC). Participants are blinded to stimulation level during each trial.
Time frame: Performance assessed when VIPES is worn and patient is completing the testing procedure.
Comparison of sway area (deg/s) during mCTSIB at stimulation conditions (0.33mA, 0.67mA, and 1mA) in comparison to randomized Sham (0mA).
Time frame: Performance assessed when VIPES is worn and patient is completing the testing procedure.
Comparison of time to complete the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test (seconds) at stimulation conditions (0.33mA, 0.67mA, and 1mA) in comparison to randomized Sham (0mA).
Time frame: Performance assessed when VIPES is worn and patient is completing the testing procedures
Comparison of sway area (deg/s) during COBALT at stimulation conditions (0.33mA, 0.67mA, and 1mA) in comparison to randomized Sham (0mA).
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Vivonics, Inc.
Industry
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07166536
Brain Concussion, Brain Diseases
Tel Aviv, Israel
View Trial DetailsNCT06381674
Balance Impairment, Brain Concussion
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07402733
Brain Concussion, Brain Diseases
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT07272941
Brain Concussion, Brain Diseases
Edmonton, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details