Clinician Communication Skills Training
OtherCommunication skills training
Other names: Vital Talk Communication Skills Training
NCT Number: NCT03609177
In this research study, the investigators are working to help oncologists better serve patients by delivering more patient-centered, goal-concordant care that may improve health care delivery.
- It is expected that about 30,000 people will take part in this research study, 29,550 of these patients, the vast majority, will be included only for medical record review.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me65 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
The purpose of this study is to improve the quality of care provided to millions of older Americans with cancer. The investigators are working to help oncologists better serve patients by delivering more patient-centered, goal-concordant care that may dramatically improve health care delivery.
This is pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized trial (SW-CRT) of a Comprehensive ACP (Advance Care Planning) Program among older oncology patients. The ACP Program will include training clinicians in communication skills and using video decision aids for participants.
We will also recruit 450 eligible patients (150 patients from each of our three sites broken down into 75 patients during the control phase and 75 patients during the intervention phase) to conduct a survey for our secondary patient-centered outcomes (confidence, satisfaction with physician communication, patient decisional satisfaction and regret). From among this sub-group we will engage 240 participants (80 from each of our three sites broken down into 40 patients during the control phase and 40 patients during the intervention phase) in an activity to film video declarations of their preferences.
During the first year, three pilot sites (one at each health care system) will trial the intervention. The subjects recruited at these pilot sites will not be included in the final analysis. Thus, the main trial will begin during year 2 and continue through year 5 with recruitment of 30,000 subjects for the primary outcome at 30 oncology clinics. The first year pilot will serve to inform the larger roll-out and the intervention may change during the first year based on pilot-clinic experience.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
for clinics:
Clinic eligibility criteria include:
Subject Eligibility: (for the in-person surveys):
Exclusion criteria
Communication skills training
Other names: Vital Talk Communication Skills Training
ACP Decisions video decision aids
Recording of patient advance care planning videos
Time frame: 6 months
Any advance directive (e.g., living will, POLST, etc.) and changes of resuscitation orders or any indication in the EHR of a goals-of-care or advance care planning conversation
Time frame: 6 months
Documented choices regarding CPR and mechanical ventilation in the EHR
Time frame: 6 months
Use of palliative care services (consults, outpatient visits) in the EHR
Time frame: 6 months
Use of hospice documented in the EHR
Time frame: 6 months
(in person survey) patient confidence that they will receive the right care at the right time by their health system. The scale ranged from 1 Not at all confident to 5 Very confident. Higher values represent a better outcome.
Time frame: 6 months
(In person survey) patient satisfaction with communication and decision making.The scale range is from 1- Strongly Disagree to 5 - Strongly Disagree. Higher values represent better outcomes. Subscales were combined questions were summed to compute a total score. The lowest possible score is a 9 and the highest possible score is 45. Lower scores indicate lower communication and decisional satisfaction.
Time frame: 6 months
(In person survey) patient regret regarding decision making. The response range is 1 - Strongly Disagree to 5 - Strongly agree. Higher numbers represent a worse outcome. Scale questions were summed to compute a total score. The lowest possible score is 2 and the highest possible score is 10. Lower scores indicate less decisional regret.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Other
Improving Advance Care Planning in Oncology: A Pragmatic, Cluster-Randomized Trial Integrating Patient Videos and Clinician Communication Training
Acronym: ACP-PEACE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05176860
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT03850912
Digestive System Diseases, Digestive System Neoplasms
Portland, Maine, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03967379
Other Cancer
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03638453
Other Cancer
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details