NCT Number: NCT02797444
Advance Care Planning for Critical Care - A Prelude to Breaking Barriers
Advance Care Planning (ACP) is a process of 'reflection and communication, in which a person with decision-making capacity makes decisions regarding their future health and/or personal care in the event that they become incapable of consenting to or refusing treatment' Most Canadians have not planned for end-of-life Care and are at risk of aggressive medical care that may not be compatible with their wishes. This study aims to systematically evaluate local barriers to making personal choices with regards to life support interventions that can be provided in the contemporary Intensive Care Unit.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
55 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Observational
Primary location
Dr. Ravi Taneja, London, Ontario, Canada
About this study
HYPOTHESIS: The overarching hypothesis is that the average layperson lacks sufficient knowledge about the aggressive life support measures used routinely in contemporary Critical Care to make informed decisions for themselves and their loved ones. Considering that most Canadians have not even heard of the term Advance Care Planning, it is likely that there is a gap in their knowledge and expectations of Critical Care. Such a gap can be bridged through education - the only caveat being that the individual should be in full possession of their faculties and can make informed decisions. This point is critical.
Thus this study uses a mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative) research design to address the following questions: 1) What is the state of knowledge about Critical Care interventions among healthy elderly laypersons in London, Ontario? 2) What are the barriers to formulating ACPs? 3) What opportunities exist for increasing ACP in the healthy elderly population? The primary objective of this proposal is to assess public knowledge of Critical Care interventions (and their outcomes) from the perspective of making Advance Care Plans. Secondary Objectives are 1) To evaluate local barriers to Advance Care Planning 2) To determine effective modes of education for Advance Care Planning that could be used for the community and in our hospital setting.
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Members from the community who are i) > 55 yrs of age, ii) living in London Middlesex community, iii) not housebound, iv) in apparent good health and iv) have the ability to make independent decisions for themselves
Exclusion criteria
- Factors that preclude a meaningful interview (such as cognitive impairment, aphasia, profound hearing impairment, language barriers) or anticipated emotional burden with the proposed topic.
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
Lay person perception and knowledge of various Critical Care interventions
Time frame: 1 year
This is a qualitative study. The primary objective of this proposal is to assess public knowledge of Critical Care interventions (and their outcomes) from the perspective of making Advance Care Plans. Examples of such interventions include but are not limited to Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, mechanical ventilation, dialysis and artificial feeding. Outcomes involve lay person knowledge, beliefs and perceptions of Critical care from the perspective of making Advance Care Plans.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Other
Registry information
Important dates
- Study start
- 2015
- Primary completion
- 2017
- Study completion
- 2017
- First posted
- Jun 13, 2016
- Registry last updated
- Sep 28, 2017
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
Exploring the Impact of " ACP Board Game for Life" on Death Preparation and Anxiety in Patients With Stage 4 and 5 Chronic Kidney Diseases: A Pilot Study
NCT06046261
Advance Care Planning, Chronic Disease
Tainan, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsCommunityRx-Dementia + Peer Navigation (CRxDpeer)
NCT07346183
Advance Care Planning, Alzheimer s Disease
View Trial DetailsResilience in East Asian Immigrants for Advance Care Planning Discussions
NCT06035549
Advance Care Planning, Neoplasms
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsAdvance Care Planning Training for Nurses
NCT05625906
Advance Care Planning
Kwun Tong, Hong Kong
View Trial Details