Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04077047

Adolescents Living With HIV (ALWH): Social Networks, Adherence and Retention

human immunodeficiency virus / acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) is the second leading cause of death in Africa. Adolescents living with HIV (ALWH) are at increased risk for HIV-related morbidity and mortality due to poor retention in HIV care and suboptimal antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence. Despite having the world's largest population of Adolescents living with HIV (ALWH) (15-24 years, n=870,000), only 14% of South African ALWH are on ART, 12% are retained in HIV care 1-2 years after ART initiation, and 10% are virally suppressed. During treatment interruption, the effects of ART quickly reverse, increasing transmission risk, treatment resistance, and potentially fatal complications. Unless their treatment retention and adherence improves, ALWH will continue to transmit the virus to their sexual partners and die prematurely.

While social support is often viewed as a bridge that joins ALWH to key resources within their environments, little is known about which types of social support are most impactful and from whom within their network, particularly among ALWH in endemic countries. Moreover, many South African ALWH lack social support from key social network members due to lack of HIV status disclosure, increasing their risk for poorer HIV-related outcomes when compare to their disclosed peers. Social network interventions (i.e., those that leverage the resources within one's network to improve behaviors and outcomes) that meet the needs of both ALWH who are disclosed and non-disclosed are needed, but lacking. Such inventions have the potential to facilitate appraisal support, during which ALWH receive targeted assistance with identifying appropriate and trustworthy people in their lives. More broadly, there exists a lack empirically supported interventions aimed at improving retention in HIV care and ART adherence for ALWH in low-middle income countries.

This proposal follows the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST), a comprehensive framework for optimizing and evaluating multicomponent behavioral interventions.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

15 year–21 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Desmond Tutu Health Foundation, Cape Town, South Africa

Loading trial locations.

About this study

This K08 focuses on the preparation phase, which consists of compiling information from various sources, including behavioral theory, scientific literature, secondary analyses of existing data, and formative research to inform a theoretical model. This model guides intervention-related decisions, such as the selection of intervention components. Piloting of intervention components and the identification and operationalization of an optimization criterion also occur in this phase. The investigators will first use social network analyses to elucidate network characteristics that influence ALWHs' retention and adherence (Aim 1), then use participatory methods to inform intervention development (Aim 2), and lastly assess intervention acceptability, feasibility, safety and evidence of efficacy (Aim 3). Aim 3 is the clinical trial component and described in detail below. Aim 1 will determine how ALWHs' social networks influence their retention in HIV care and ART adherence and Aim 2 will then focus on the development of a network-based, social support intervention to improve ALWH retention in HIV care and ART adherence informed by Aim 1 and other relevant information.

The goal of aim 3 is to assess intervention acceptability, feasibility, safety and evidence of efficacy through open piloting. The investigators will assess intervention acceptability, feasibility, safety, and evidence of efficacy using an iterative process enabling feedback and continuing quality improvement over the course of implementation. This approach involves the piloting of the network intervention developed in Aim 2. The rationale is that the best interventions for ALWH will consider their unique needs and include tailored components. The outcome of this Aim will be a feasible and acceptable social network intervention that will be tested in an adaptive intervention using future grant funding. The hypothesis for aim 3 is that the intervention will be acceptable, feasible, and safe, with trends towards improved ALWH retention in HIV care and ART adherence.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • reside in study area
  • able to provide consent or assent
  • agreeable to allowing the research team to have access to their clinic data to assess retention in human immunodeficiency virus- (HIV) care and antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence
  • each Adolescents living with HIV (ALWH) must recruit at least one social network member to participate in the intervention with them

Exclusion criteria

  • None

Treatment and study plan

iEngage

Behavioral

The intervention is a network-based, social support intervention to improve Adolescents living with HIV (ALWH) retention in HIV care and antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence

Other names: network-based, social support intervention

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility: exit interviews

    Time frame: 12 month follow up

    Measured using exit interviews

  2. Acceptability: exit interviews

    Time frame: 12 month follow up

    Measured using exit interviews

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in HIV stigma & discrimination

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  2. Change in HIV knowledge

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  3. Change in autonomy

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  4. Change in sense of community

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  5. Change in basic psychological needs

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  6. Change in social support

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  7. Change in trust

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  8. Change in relationship equity

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  9. Change in agency

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  10. Change in future orientation

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  11. Change in mental health

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  12. Change in healthcare access

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  13. Change in physical health

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  14. Change in housing stability

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  15. Change in economic support

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  16. Change in income

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  17. Change in food security

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  18. Change in food transportation

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  19. Change in viral load

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    Gathered from existing medical records

  20. Change in ART adherence

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

  21. Change in retention in HIV care

    Time frame: baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow up

    may include de novo questionnaire, interview

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Registry information

Official study title

Understanding and Developing a Network-based Social Support Intervention to Improve Retention in Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Care and Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence for Adolescents Living With HIV

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Sep 4, 2019
Registry last updated
Jun 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.