Nudge
BehavioralEHR-based "nudge"
NCT Number: NCT04844021
The objective of this study is to compare two approaches to implement an evidence-based firearm safety promotion program, S.A.F.E. Firearm, in pediatric primary care as a universal suicide prevention strategy. The first implementation approach is a prompt in the electronic health record (EHR; Nudge) reminding clinicians to a) discuss firearm storage and b) offer a free cable firearm lock during the pediatric well visit. The second implementation approach (Nudge+) includes both the EHR Nudge described above plus one year of support to the clinics in deploying the program (i.e., practice facilitation). The study also aims to identify how these strategies work and whether the S.A.F.E. Firearm program results in reduced unauthorized access to firearms by young people. The investigators hypothesize that a greater proportion of well-visits will have S.A.F.E. Firearm delivery documented in the electronic health record in Nudge+ clinics vs. Nudge clinics.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, Colorado, United States
The investigators will conduct a hybrid type III effectiveness-implementation trial using a longitudinal cluster randomized design to test the most effective way to implement S.A.F.E. Firearm among 30 clinics, 158 clinicians, and 48,475 youth nested in two Mental Health Research Network (MHRN) health systems in Michigan and Colorado. Clinics will be randomized to receive either the EHR implementation strategy (Nudge) or the EHR implementation strategy plus 1 year of facilitation to target implementation barriers (Nudge+).
Aim 1: Examine the effects of Nudge vs. Nudge+ on implementation outcomes.
Aim 2: Use mixed methods to identify implementation strategy mechanisms. The investigators hypothesize that Nudge+ will have a stronger effect because it will improve clinic adaptive reserve (i.e., the ability to make and sustain change). The investigators will also investigate the role of clinician motivation. The investigators hypothesize that clinician attitudes towards firearm counseling, clinician burnout, and clinician demographics will moderate implementation strategy effectiveness.
Aim 3: Examine the effects of the adapted intervention on clinical outcomes. The investigators hypothesize that Nudge+ will result in a greater proportion of parents reporting that they made firearm(s) less accessible to their child(ren) compared with Nudge. The investigators will explore rates of youth suicide attempts, deaths, and unintentional firearm injury and mortality by implementation condition and across time.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Parents
Exclusion criteria
Parents
Inclusion criteria
Clinicians and leaders
Exclusion criteria
Clinicians and leaders
EHR-based "nudge"
EHR-based "nudge" plus facilitation
Time frame: EHR data on reach will be extracted for the time period: the beginning of the active implementation period through the end of the active implementation period (12 months total)
Reach is the proportion of eligible well-child visits who received the S.A.F.E. Firearm program. "Participants" refers to well-child visits. For each well-child visit, data regarding S.A.F.E. Firearm delivery were available in the form of binary indicators, with 1 indicating S.A.F.E. Firearm was delivered during the visit and 0 indicating S.A.F.E. Firearm was not delivered during the visit. Reach outcomes presented below are means of the binary indicators, which were calculated across all eligible well-child visits.
Time frame: surveys collected from parents within two weeks of well-child visit. Surveys will be collected during the duration of the pre-implementation, active implementation, and sustainment phases (30 months total)
Whether the clinician followed the two S.A.F.E. Firearm steps (counseling and offering cable lock), measured via parent-report
Time frame: Parent surveys will be collected from parents within two weeks of well-child visit from pre-implementation through sustainment (30 months total)
Parent-report of acceptability of the S.A.F.E. Firearm program. Parents will be asked to answer questions pertaining to the acceptability of program components. Specifically, they will answer yes/no questions developed by the research team which ask whether they found the component acceptable.
Time frame: Clinician surveys will be collected at two time points during the study period: during pre-implementation (surveys will be administered for approximately 1 month) and during active implementation (surveys will be administered for approximately 1 month)
Clinician-report of acceptability of the S.A.F.E. Firearm program. Acceptability of the implementation strategies - EHR nudge and facilitation - will be collected from clinicians as well. Clinicians will be asked questions developed by the research team about whether they found various components of the program and implementation strategies acceptable, and will answer each question with a Likert-scaled answer.
Time frame: Cost data will be collected from pre-implementation through sustainment (30 months total)
Cost of the implementation strategies (EHR nudge, facilitation) and the S.A.F.E. Firearm program delivery. Data on the cost of implementing the program (e.g., costs for printing program materials and distributing firearm locks) and the implementation strategies (e.g., facilitator full-time equivalent [FTE] time) will be collected to estimate the overall cost of the program and implementation strategy delivery.
Time frame: Cable lock distribution data will be collected from active implementation through sustainment (24 months total)
Number of cable locks distributed by each clinic will be collected
Northwestern University
Other
A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Strategies to Implement Firearm Safety Promotion as a Universal Suicide Prevention Strategy in Pediatric Primary Care
Acronym: ASPIRE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05637203
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05282225
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05272176
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04130958
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details