Adjunctive Linezolid for the Treatment of Tuberculous Meningitis

Parameters were estimated in NONMEM v7.5 using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) by optimizing the likelihood function based on observed data. The First Order Conditional Estimation (FOCE) method was employed, which linearizes the model around individual-specific estimates to efficiently account for both fixed effects (population-level parameters) and random effects (individual variability).

Parameters were estimated in NONMEM v7.5 using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) by optimizing the likelihood function based on observed data. The First Order Conditional Estimation (FOCE) method was employed, which linearizes the model around individual-specific estimates to efficiently account for both fixed effects (population-level parameters) and random effects (individual variability).

Parameters were estimated in NONMEM v7.5 using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) by optimizing the likelihood function based on observed data. The First Order Conditional Estimation (FOCE) method was employed, which linearizes the model around individual-specific estimates to efficiently account for both fixed effects (population-level parameters) and random effects (individual variability).

Parameters were estimated in NONMEM v7.5 using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) by optimizing the likelihood function based on observed data. The First Order Conditional Estimation (FOCE) method was employed, which linearizes the model around individual-specific estimates to efficiently account for both fixed effects (population-level parameters) and random effects (individual variability).

Once plasma parameter estimates were finalized, these were fixed and then linked to CSF concentrations via a hypothetical effect compartment with a unidirectional rate of the entry whose rate was described by KPC and an amount, expressed as PC, or a ratio between plasma concentrations and CSF concentrations. Higher values of KPC indicate faster rates of entry, and higher values of PC indicate greater proportions of linezolid entering from the blood into the CSF.

Parameters were estimated in NONMEM v7.5 using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) by optimizing the likelihood function based on observed data. The First Order Conditional Estimation (FOCE) method was employed, which linearizes the model around individual-specific estimates to efficiently account for both fixed effects (population-level parameters) and random effects (individual variability).

Measures the degree of disability/dependence on a 6 point scale ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death).

The WAIS-III assesses speed of information processing. The test consists of 133 small blank squares separated into 7 rows. Each square consists a number ranging from 1-9 and a blank space below. The participant must pair each number in the square with its corresponding symbol provided in a 'key' above the test over a time limit of 90 or 120 seconds. Scores range from 1-133 where higher scores equal indicate better outcomes.

The Color Trails, part 1 is used to assess attention and working memory. For this test 25 circles each containing a number between 1 and 25 are randomly placed on a sheet of paper. Participants draw a line between circles as quickly as possible in numerical order. Scores are presented as time to completion. Higher values indicate greater impairment.

The Color Trails, part 2 is used to assess executive function. For this test 25 circles each containing either a number between 1 and 13 or a letter between A through L are randomly placed on a sheet of paper. Participants draw a line between circles as quickly as possible alternating between number and letter in ascending order. Scores are presented as time to completion. Higher values indicate greater impairment.

The Category Fluency test measures executive function and semantic fluency. Participants have 1 minute to name as many categorical items as possible. Scores are presented as the total number of correct names. Lower values indicate greater impairment.

Either the HVLT-R or WHO-UCLA AVLT will be used to assess verbal learning and memory. In the HVLT-R Participants are asked to recall a list of 12 words. It includes four subscales: total recall, delayed recall, retention score, and recognition discrimination index. The total recall score indicates the number of correctly reported words in 3 learning trials, with a subscale ranging from 0-36. The delayed recall subscale, ranging from 0-12, indicates the number of correctly reported words in the delayed recall trial. The retention score represents the score on the delayed recall test divided by the higher of the recall scores from learning trials 2 and 3, multiplied by 100. The recognition discrimination index (RDI) is calculated by subtracting the total false positives score (semantically-related plus semantically un-related) from the total true-positives score obtained in the delayed recognition test. For all subscales, higher values indicate better outcomes.

Either the HVLT-R or WHO-UCLA AVLT will be used to assess verbal learning and memory. The WHO-UCLA AVLT includes a 15 word list learned over five trials (subscale from 0-75), an interference trial (subscale from 0-15), and a 20 minute delayed recall trial (subscale from 0-15). A final delayed recognition trial is performed immediately after delayed recall. The retention score represents the score on the delayed recall test divided by the higher of the recall scores from learning trials 2-5, multiplied by 100. The recognition discrimination index (RDI) is calculated by subtracting the total false positives score from the total true-positives score obtained in the delayed recognition test. For all subscales, higher values indicate better outcomes.

The Grooved Pegboard Bilateral test evaluates fine motor ability. One hand at a time, subjects place 25 pegs as quickly as possible in a board with randomly oriented peg holes. Scores for each hand are presented as time to completion. Higher values indicate greater impairment.

The Finger Tapping Bilateral test evaluates fine motor ability. One hand at a time, subjects tap a lever counter device as quickly as possible within a 10 second time interval. A total of ten trials are conducted, five trials per hand. Trial subscores are presented as the number of taps within the 10 second interval. Trial subscores for each hand are averaged for a total score. Higher values indicate better outcomes.

Completed if participant is unable to undergo the full neurocognitive test battery. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a brief cognitive screening tool used to detect mild neurocognitive disability. It assesses six key areas of cognitive ability: short-term memory, visuospatial abilities, executive functions, language, orientation to time and place, and attention, concentration and working memory. The assessment has 11 scored sections, summed for a total score ranging from 0-30 points; a score of 26 or above is considered normal.