Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06695832

Adjunctive Fosfomycin for Treatment of Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteraemia

Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is a frequent and life-threatening infection, despite current standard antibiotic monotherapy. This study aims to clarify the role of fosfomycin as an adjunctive therapy for improving outcomes in patients with this serious infection. Two clinical trials suggested that adjunctive fosfomycin therapy might offer a clinical benefit in certain cases, but the results are inconclusive. We aim to analyse pooled data from these trials in order to identify subgroups of patients that might benefit most from this therapy.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

The Royal Melbourne Hospital, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background. Improving outcomes in patients with methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant (MRSA) Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is a critical healthcare goal. Two recent randomised clinical trials (RCTs), the BACSARM trial and the SAFO trial, assessed the efficacy of fosfomycin as an adjunctive therapy for MRSA and MSSA SAB respectively. Although neither trial demonstrated statistically significant differences in their primary endpoints of treatment success and reduced mortality respectively, both studies observed lower rates of persistent bacteraemia in the fosfomycin groups.

Methods. We will perform a post-hoc analysis of pooled individual patient data from the BACSARM and SAFO trials, which will be referred to as the BACSAFO study. The primary exposure of interest is fosfomycin adjunctive therapy, and the primary outcome will be treatment success at 8 weeks, defined as the patient being alive, without signs of relapse, and showing improvement in clinical signs and symptoms. We will use both Bayesian and frequentist methodologies: the Bayesian analysis will use a hierarchical Bayesian log-binomial model, while the frequentist analysis will apply a hierarchical log-binomial model. In addition, we will investigate whether adjunctive fosfomycin is particularly beneficial in specific patient subgroups (created according to age, methicillin resistance, place of acquisition, and complicated bacteraemia status).

Discussion. The BACSAFO study aims to clarify the role of fosfomycin as an adjunctive therapy for improving outcomes in SAB patients. Although previous trials have not demonstrated significant differences in the primary endpoints, the significant reductions in rates of persistent bacteraemia observed suggest that fosfomycin might offer a clinical benefit in certain cases. By analysing pooled data and attempting to identify subgroups that might benefit most, this study has the potential to refine treatment strategies and inform trial design and planning for future RCTs investigating combination antibiotic therapies for SAB.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients included in the BACSARM and SAFO clinical trials.

Exclusion criteria

  • For both trials: polymicrobial bacteraemia, severe clinical status with expected survival < 24 hours, severe liver disease with Child-Pugh score class C, diagnosis of prosthetic infective endocarditis, allergy or known resistance to study drugs, pregnancy at the time of inclusion, inclusion in another clinical trial.
  • For the BACSARM trial: diagnosis of MRSA pneumonia, prior history of eosinophilic pneumonia, use of additional antibiotic therapy with microbiological activity against MRSA.
  • For the SAFO trial: prior history of myasthenia gravis, acute SARS-CoV2 infection.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment success at 8 weeks from the time of randomisation

    Time frame: 8 weeks from the time of randomisation

    A composite outcome available from the information collected in both trials and based on the fulfilment of all the following criteria:

    • Alive at week 8 from the time of randomisation.
    • Absence of relapse within 8 weeks after randomisation, defined as isolation of S. aureus in blood cultures after the index blood cultures were cleared.
    • Improvement of clinical signs and symptoms as assessed by investigators of the BACSARM and SAFO trials at week 8 from the time of randomisation.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Persistent bacteraemia

    Time frame: At days 3 and 7 from the time of randomisation

    Positive blood cultures for S. aureus at days 3 and 7 from the time of randomisation

  2. Mortality at days 14, 30 and 60 from the time of randomisation

    Time frame: Days 14, 30 and 60 from the time of randomisation

    Mortality at days 14, 30 and 60 from the time of randomisation

  3. Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation

    Time frame: During the time that adjunctive fosfomycin therapy was administered

    Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation during adjunctive fosfomycin therapy

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge

Other

Collaborators

  • Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge

Registry information

Official study title

Adjunctive Fosfomycin for Treatment of Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteraemia: Protocol for a Pooled Post-hoc Analysis of Two Randomised Clinical Trials

Acronym: BACSAFO

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Nov 19, 2024
Registry last updated
Nov 22, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.