Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02242617

Adherence and Preference of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Mandibular Advancement Splints in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Patients: A Randomized Trial

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a major health problem affecting over 1,000,000 Canadians. It is the cause of significant healthcare costs with increased morbidity and mortality. The two most common and effective therapies used to treat OSA are: (1) Continuous or Automatic Positive Airway Pressure (PAP), and (2) Mandibular Advancement Splints (MAS). While both therapies reduce upper airway collapse during sleep, they differ in efficacy, acceptance, cost and side-effects, but surprisingly are similar in improving quality of life, sleepiness and blood pressure. PAP is more effective in reducing apneas while MAS is easier to use. Until now, studies have used self-reported adherence data on MAS versus objective adherence on PAP. Many studies have hypothesized that the sub-optimal efficacy with MAS therapy is counterbalanced by the superior adherence relative to PAP, resulting in a similar effectiveness for both treatments. Compliance smart chips are a recent innovation for MAS and could be used to prove this hypothesis and allow a new and complete comparison of effectiveness (efficacy + adherence) between MAS and PAP. Understanding the patient's objective adherence and long-term symptomatic improvement would provide vital information to doctors and dentists in choosing the right treatment for patients. Sixty OSA patients will receive both PAP and MAS in a random sequence. This innovative study lead by two experienced new investigators, and a research team of multidisciplinary experts, will assess objective adherence, treatment efficacy, patient preference, sleepiness and quality of life of each treatment used at home for 1 month per treatment. After this, patients will be able to go back and forth between both treatments during an additional 6-month period. The results of this study will be used by healthcare policy makers as well as clinicians who need to be part of the treatment plan decision for the many Canadians who suffer from sleep apnea.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

19 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The primary aim of this study is to assess objective adherence to treatment, for PAP and MAS, and to evaluate if there will be similar effectiveness (efficacy+adherence) between PAP and MAS treatment for patients with mild to severe OSA. The secondary aim is to assess if patient preference does correlate to the final treatment adherence. An exploratory aim is to assess if the strategy of patients having both treatments available to use interchangeably could further improve treatment adherence, sleepiness, quality of life and fatigue. Having a better insight into patient adherence will improve the cost-effectiveness of treatment and will improve the health and quality of life for many Canadians who suffer from sleep apnea.

The proposed trial is a randomized open-label, two-treatment, two-period cross-over trial followed by an observational trial. Sixty OSA patients (10≤AHI≤50) will receive both PAP and MAS. As a recent innovation, we have adherence monitors for MAS that can give a new and comprehensive comparative analysis of the effectiveness between MAS and PAP. In the randomized trial phase the two treatments will be used separately for 1 month each (after treatment adaptation/titration of 1-2 months for each device). Treatment efficacy and daily treatment use data will be assessed together with changes in symptoms (quality of life, sleepiness and fatigue). Patient initial preference will be determined by using a patient decision aid. This will be followed by the observational trial phase, where all patients will have access to both interventions at home for 6 months and be allowed to choose on a daily basis the intervention to use. The intervention duration of 6 months is to allow for a sustained response in long-term adherence and to observe changes in quality of life.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

You may be able to participate in this study if:

  • You are naïve to treatment (never used CPAP or oral appliance, nor had surgery for sleep apnea);
  • You are between 19-75 years old;
  • You have a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 35;
  • You have enough teeth (at least 8 per arch) for MAS;
  • You have:
  • an Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) within the range 10 ≤ AHI ≤ 50 documented with polysomnography in the last 2 years; ***OR***
  • a Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI) within the range 20 ≤ RDI ≤ 50 documented with level III portable sleep test; ***OR***
  • an Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI) ≥ 10; and
  • You have had a sleep test within the past 2 years.

Exclusion criteria

You may not be able to participate in this study if:

  • You have extensive periodontal disease with significant tooth mobility (disease around your teeth);
  • You are unable to protrude the jaw (unable to extend your jaw);
  • You have a lack of a sufficient vertical opening to accommodate an appliance;
  • You have uncontrolled congestive heart failure (defined as a prior clinical diagnosis, an ejection cutoff of 40% or a clinical sign in the opinion of a primary care physician or cardiologist) that makes it unsafe for you to participate in the trial in the opinion of the investigators;
  • You have coronary artery disease unless stable for at least 6 months and considered by the investigators to have a stable disease;
  • You have a history of angina (chest pain when your heart does not get enough blood), myocardial infarction (heart attack) or stroke;
  • You have a history of major depressive disorder (such as bipolar disorder) along with current moderate or severe disease;
  • You have cancer unless in remission (decreasing signs of your cancer being present) for more than 1 year;
  • You have known renal (kidney) failure with need for dialysis;
  • You are pregnant (if a female participant becomes pregnant during the trial, she will be withdrawn from the study);
  • You have had a near miss or prior automobile accident due to sleepiness within the past 12 months; and/or
  • At nighttime, 30% of the night is at ≤ 90% oxygen saturation levels.

Treatment and study plan

Positive Airway Pressure (PAP)

Device

Continuous or auto-adjusting positive airway pressure (i.e. CPAP, APAP, and described here as PAP): a device which consists of a face mask attached to a plastic tube and a machine that blows compressed air through a patient's airway during sleep to keep the airway open

Other names: CPAP, auto-CPAP, APAP

Mandibular Advancement Splints (MAS)

Device

Mandibular advancement splints (MAS): dental splints used to keep the mandible in an advanced position opening the upper airway during sleep

Other names: Oral appliance, Mandibular advancement devices, Somnodent device

Primary outcomes

  1. Objectively measured adherence (hours/night and nights/week of intervention use).

    Time frame: At 1 month in the MAS treatment arm

    Measuring objective adherence (hours/night and nights/week of intervention use), indicated by the smart chips and symptoms.

  2. Objectively measured adherence (hours/night and nights/week of intervention use).

    Time frame: At 1 month in CPAP treatment arm

    Measuring changes in objectively measured adherence (hours/night and nights/week of intervention use), indicated by the smart chips and symptoms.

  3. Objectively measured adherence (hours/night and nights/week of intervention use).

    Time frame: At 1 month of using both treatments interchangeably.

    Measuring changes in objectively measured adherence (hours/night and nights/week of intervention use), indicated by the smart chips and symptoms.

  4. Objectively measured adherence (hours/night and nights/week of intervention use).

    Time frame: At 6 months of using both treatments interchangeably

    Measuring changes in objectively measured adherence (hours/night and nights/week of intervention use), indicated by the smart chips and symptoms.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Apnea-hypopnea index

    Time frame: At baseline

    Measuring apnea-hypopnea index (events/hour of sleep from Stardust-Phillips Respironics) to measure intervention efficacy (e.g. AHI)

  2. Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) responses

    Time frame: At baseline

    Measuring Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) responses to evaluate disease specific quality of life.

  3. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire responses.

    Time frame: At baseline

    Measuring responses to Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Questionnaire to compare daytime sleepiness.

  4. Chalder fatigue scale questionnaire responses

    Time frame: At baseline

    Measuring responses to the Chalder fatigue scale which assesses fatigue in the present state.

  5. SF-36 survey responses

    Time frame: At baseline

    Measuring SF-36 survey responses which assesses general health status.

  6. Apnea-hypopnea index

    Time frame: At 1 month in MAS treatment arm

    Measuring changes in apnea-hypopnea index (events/hour of sleep from Stardust-Phillips Respironics) to measure intervention efficacy (e.g. AHI)

  7. Apnea-hypopnea index

    Time frame: At 1 month in CPAP treatment arm

    Measuring changes in apnea-hypopnea index (events/hour of sleep from Stardust-Phillips Respironics) to measure intervention efficacy (e.g. AHI)

  8. Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) responses.

    Time frame: At 1 month in MAS treatment arm

    Measuring changes in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) responses to evaluate disease specific quality of life.

  9. Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) responses.

    Time frame: At 1 month of using both treatments interchangeably

    Measuring changes in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) responses to evaluate disease specific quality of life.

  10. Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) responses

    Time frame: At 6 months of using both treatments interchangeably

    Measuring changes in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) responses to evaluate disease specific quality of life.

  11. Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) responses.

    Time frame: At 1 month in CPAP treatment arm

    Measuring changes in Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ) responses to evaluate disease specific quality of life.

  12. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire responses.

    Time frame: At 1 month in MAS treatment arm

    Measuring changes in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Questionnaire responses to compare daytime sleepiness.

  13. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire responses.

    Time frame: At 1 month in CPAP treatment arm.

    Measuring changes in responses to Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Questionnaire to compare daytime sleepiness

  14. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire responses

    Time frame: At 1 month of using both treatments interchangeably

    Measuring changes in responses to Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Questionnaire to compare daytime sleepiness.

  15. Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) questionnaire responses.

    Time frame: At 6 months of using both treatments interchangeably.

    Measuring changes in responses to Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Questionnaire to compare daytime sleepiness.

  16. Chalder fatigue scale questionnaire responses

    Time frame: At 1 month in MAS treatment arm

    Measuring changes in responses to the Chalder fatigue scale which assesses fatigue in the present state.

  17. Chalder fatigue scale questionnaire responses

    Time frame: At 1 month in CPAP treatment arm

    Measuring changes in responses to the Chalder fatigue scale which assesses fatigue in the present state.

  18. Chalder fatigue scale questionnaire responses

    Time frame: At 1 month of using both treatments interchangeably

    Measuring changes in responses to the Chalder fatigue scale which assesses fatigue in the present state.

  19. Chalder fatigue scale questionnaire responses

    Time frame: At 6 months of using both treatments interchangeably.

    Measuring changes in responses to the Chalder fatigue scale which assesses fatigue in the present state.

  20. SF-36 survey responses.

    Time frame: At 1 month in MAS treatment arm

    Measuring changes in SF-36 survey responses which assesses general health status.

  21. SF-36 survey responses.

    Time frame: At 1 month in CPAP treatment arm.

    Measuring changes in SF-36 survey responses which assesses general health status.

  22. SF-36 survey responses.

    Time frame: At 1 month of using both treatments interchangeably.

    Measuring changes in SF-36 survey responses which assesses general health status.

  23. SF-36 survey responses.

    Time frame: At 6 months of using both treatments interchangeably.

    Measuring changes in SF-36 survey responses which assesses general health status.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of British Columbia

Other

Collaborators

  • Laval University
  • Université de Montréal

Registry information

Acronym: CHOICE

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Sep 17, 2014
Registry last updated
Nov 30, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.