Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06570616

Addressing Unintentional Leakage When Using Nasal CPAP - Study A

Oral unintentional leak is a common side effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) treatment. Management of oral unintentional leakage has not been standardized and the effectiveness of potential approaches have not been studied in controlled studies. Higher levels of CPAP are associated with higher leak. In the present study, a sequential approach to control excessive unintentional leak will be tested. In study A, the reduction of therapeutic CPAP level will be tested. In study B, oronasal CPAP will be compared to nasal CPAP with a chinstrap.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Sleep Laboratory, Heart Institute, Pulmonary Division, Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Study A will consist of a cross-over controlled randomized trial to compare unintentional leak during auto-CPAP and during fixed CPAP after the progressive reduction of fixed CPAP, starting at the 90 th percentile obtained during a period of auto-CPAP. The order of interventions will be randomized. Auto-CPAP with a nasal mask will be used for 7 days. In the fixed CPAP arm, CPAP will be progressively reduced over a period of up to 21 days until leak is controlled or residual apnea-hypopnea index increases over 10 events/h. Subjects that persisted with excessive leak at the end of the Study A will be invited to Study B.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea;
  • Use of CPAP with a nasal mask;
  • 95th percentile of unintentional leak from the last 7 days above 24 l/min or at least 4 sudden leak line drop events

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients who experience unintentional leakage from the mask/accessories.
  • Diagnostic polysomnography examination with a predominance of central apnea;
  • Patients with unstable heart disease, bedridden, neurodegenerative diseases, severe psychiatric disorders and COPD;
  • Previous surgery for obstructive sleep apnea;
  • Severe nasal obstruction (NOSE questionnaire score equal or greater then 55 points).

Treatment and study plan

CPAP (fixed mode)

Device

Patients will undergo strategies to control excessive leakage while using autoCPAP vs. progressively decreasing fixed nasal CPAP. Before randomization, subjects will undergo an autoCPAP titration for 3 days. Subjects will then be randomized to start the protocol with autoCPAP or fixed CPAP and then will switch to the alternative arm.

APAP (automatic mode)

Device

Patients will undergo strategies to control excessive leakage while using autoCPAP vs. progressively decreasing fixed nasal CPAP. Before randomization, subjects will undergo an autoCPAP titration for 3 days. Subjects will then be randomized to start the protocol with autoCPAP or fixed CPAP and then will switch to the alternative arm.

Primary outcomes

  1. 95th CPAP unintentional leak

    Time frame: 27 days

    The 95th unintentional leak percentile value will be compared during both interventions

Secondary outcomes

  1. CPAP Side-effects questionnaire

    Time frame: 27 days

    This questionnaire addresses CPAP side-effects including those related to excessive air leak using a visual-analog scale.

Other outcomes

  1. CPAP level

    Time frame: 27 days

    CPAP level will be compared during both interventions

  2. Residual apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)

    Time frame: 27 days

    Residual AHI will be compared during both interventions

  3. Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ 10)

    Time frame: 27 days

    The FOSQ 10 aims to assess the impacts of daytime sleepiness on daily activities. The FOSQ 10 consists of 10 questions comprising 5 items: General productivity, alertness, activity level, social outcomes, and intimate and sexual relationships. Each item generates a score from 1 to 4, and for items with more than one question, the average of the scores is calculated. The overall score is given by multiplying the average of the item scores by 5, obtaining a value from 5 to 20. The higher the score, the better the individual's functional status.

  4. Pittsburgh questionnaire

    Time frame: 27 days

    The Pittsburgh questionnaire assessed sleep quality over the past month. The questionnaire consists of 19 self-reported questions and 5 questions related to the roommate/bed partner that are not included in the overall score. The 19 self-reported questions are divided into 7 components (respectively, subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medications, and daytime sleep dysfunction), and each component is scored on a scale of 0 to 3. The scores are then summed to form an overall scale of 0 to 21 points. The higher the score, the worse the sleep quality, and a PSQI greater than 5 indicates poor sleep quality.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Pedro Genta

CONTACT

[email protected]

551126615486

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Strategies for Controlling Unintentional Leakage in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2028
First posted
Aug 26, 2024
Registry last updated
Apr 30, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.