Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07671209
The purpose of this study is to explore if screening health-related social needs and early social work consultation is feasible and acceptable for adults with leukemias. The study examines whether the intervention (ACCESS-Leukemia) improves outcomes. Researchers will compare social determinants of health screening and early involvement of social work to usual care.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Social determinants of health (SDOH) are non-medical social, environmental, and economic factors that impact health outcomes. Health-related social needs (HRSNs) then refer to the individual-level experiences arising from adverse SDOH that negatively affect an individual's well-being. Notably, an estimated 80% of health outcomes are attributable to SDOH rather than direct medical care.
Despite major advances in cancer diagnostics and treatment, outcome gaps remain. Factors as unemployment, financial hardship, housing instability, and limited social support are known to affect cancer-specific morbidity and mortality. Yet, patients are not routinely screened to identify potentially actionable barriers to care.
Prior work has shown that structured SDOH screening can be done successfully in outpatient cancer clinics, but this has not been studied in leukemia patients. Screening may be especially important in this group, as HRSNs have been linked to reduced access to care, differences in treatment response, and worse survival.
This study involves a multi-component intervention (ACCESS-Leukemia) that includes systematic screening for HRSNs and early introduction of oncology social workers. The investigators are studying the feasibility of delivering this program, the acceptability with the program, and changes in financial burden, rate of unmet HRSNs, psychosocial support, and quality of life among patients who receive the intervention. The investigators will also examine the prevalence of HRSNs and their association with healthcare utilization. The study will use a series of questionnaires that can be completed by participants in clinic, in the hospital, or at home.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Pilot intervention includes a screening survey of health-related social needs followed by a social work consultation within 2 weeks of study enrollment, regardless of their answers on the screening survey. Patients will complete baseline assessments, and the HRSNs screen must be completed before the third leukemia clinic visit.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Number of participants that are eligible to enroll on the protocol
Time frame: 24 weeks
Number of participants that complete the HRSN screen before 3rd leukemia clinic visit from time of study enrollment
Time frame: up to week 24
Satisfaction rating of participants who received the intervention on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ). The CSQ includes 4 questions and is scored on a 4-point Likert scale with higher score indicating higher satisfaction. The program will be deemed acceptable if mean average score of participants is 12 or higher (out of 16).
Time frame: up to week 24
To compare psychological distress between groups as measured by HADS. The HADS is a 14-item measure with scale ranging from 0-21 with higher scores indicating worse psychological distress.
Time frame: up to week 24
To compare financial burden of illness between groups as measured by FACIT. This is a 12-item survey with score ranging from 0-44 with lower score indicating worse financial burden.
Time frame: up to week 24
To compare perception of social support between groups as measured by SSQ, with 6 questions. Each question has a rating between 1 and 6 with higher score indicative of higher satisfaction with social support.
Time frame: up to week 24
To compare health-related quality of life between groups as measured by the FACT-G7, a 7-item survey with scores ranging between 0-28, with higher score indicating better quality of life.
Time frame: up to week 24
Participants will be asked a 3-item survey; first question will ask whether participants are worried about delay in medical care or miss appointments due to 13 pre-specified domains of HRSNs; second question will ask if participants had the opportunity to share their concerns with the healthcare team; and third question asks participants if they'd like more information regarding any of the 13 pre-specified HRSN domains. The investigators will compare answers between the two groups.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Other
ACCESS-Leukemia: Addressing Cancer Care Equity With Social Determinants of Health Screening and Early Intervention
Acronym: ACCESS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03680677
Hematologic Diseases, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04482894
ALL, Adult, AML, Adult
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07296445
APL, Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia
View Trial DetailsNCT05823571
Blood Protein Disorders, Bone Marrow Diseases
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details