Rituximab
Biological1000 mg Rituximab infusion
Other names: Mab Thera
NCT Number: NCT01244958
Combination of rituximab (RTX) with several different chemotherapeutic regimes has proven synergistic effects in patients with either lymphoma or autoimmune diseases. First data of uncontrolled trials with the combination of RTX and leflunomide (LEF) are available.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Schwerpunktpraxis, Bad Kösen, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
Rituximab provides lasting improvement in the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after two infusions per treatment course in tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor inadequate responder (IR) patients. Importantly, MabThera® has been shown to inhibit radiographic progression in this highly pre-treated patient population. Rituximab is licensed for adult patients with severe active RA in combination with methotrexate after inadequate response to previous treatment, including TNF alpha- Inhibitors.
In daily practice the combination with methotrexate is often limited to side effects or contraindications to Methotrexate (MTX). Therefore there is an unmet medical need for evidence for the combination of RTX with other Disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)than MTX.
Leflunomide is a DMARD that selectively inhibits de novo pyrimidine synthesis by blocking the enzyme dihydro-orotate dehydrogenase, thereby preventing DNA synthesis. The efficacy and safety of leflunomide in patients with active RA have been demonstrated in three phase III studies. Leflunomide was shown to be better than placebo and at least as effective as methotrexate in improving individual signs and symptoms of RA; these responses were seen as early as 4 weeks and were maintained for up to 2 years. Leflunomide was also effective in slowing disease progression as assessed by radiographic analysis of joint damage, and in improving functional activity as measured by the Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disease Activity Index. An open label extension study of patients treated with leflunomide demonstrated that these improvements are maintained for up to 5 years in a subset of patients, with no new or unexpected adverse events emerging compared with the initial phase III studies.
In Europe leflunomide is often used in daily clinical practice as an alterative to MTX in patients with active RA.
Recently published data of a small open label trial (Vital et al. 2008) and data of a German non-interventional study (NIS) (Wendler et al. 2009) demonstrated the effectiveness of the addition of RTX to leflunomide in patients with active RA. The proportion of patients achieving EULAR (European League against Rheumatism) moderate to good response was 61% for RTX alone, 65 % for RTX plus MTX and 79% for RTX plus leflunomide in the German NIS. In the Leeds study of Vital et al.
33% of the patients achieved ACR (American College of Rheumatology)50 response (ACR 20: 68%, ACR 70: 20%) despite multiple pre-treatments, including patients with inadequate response to three TNF-Inhibitors.
The low rate of serious adverse drug reactions in the different groups of the German NIS demonstrated the safety of the combination of RTX and leflunomide (n=90) (1.6 / 1.1 / 0,5% for RTX+MTX / RTX+LEF / RTX Mono, 5.1 / 6,7 / 3,8% experienced infusion reactions)
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Male and female patients, 18 to 75 years of age, with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, not more than 3 non-biological DMARDs including leflunomide, and not more than one inadequate response to anti-TNF-therapy, and currently have active disease despite at least 3-month treatment with leflunomide. Active disease is defined as DAS 28 >3.2 and at least swollen joint count (SJC) ≥ 3 and tender joint count (TJC) ≥ 3 included in the 28 joint count.
Exclusion criteria
1000 mg Rituximab infusion
Other names: Mab Thera
infusion of Sodium citrate, Polysorbate, Sodium chloride
Time frame: Week 24
Proportion of patients with an ACR 50 response at week 24
Time frame: week 52
Mean of DAS28 at week 52
Time frame: From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 52 weeks
To determine the efficacy and safety at week 24 of rituximab treatment of 2x1000 mg i.v. vs. placebo and the efficacy and safety at week 52 of rituximab 2x1000 mg i.v. vs 2x500 mg
Time frame: From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 52 weeks
EULAR response rates at week 16, 24, 40, 48
Time frame: From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 52 weeks
Change in ACR core set (Swollen Joint count (SJC), Tender Joint Count (TJC), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), patient's and physician's global assessments visual analog Scale (VAS), subject's pain scale, C-reactive protein (CRP) and Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR))compared to baseline at all follow-up visits
Time frame: From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 52 weeks
Change in SF-36 scores compared to baseline at all followup visits
Time frame: From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 52 weeks
Change in FACIT-fatigue assessment compared to baseline at all follow-up visits at week 16, 24, 40 and 48
Time frame: From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 52 weeks
Change in HAQ assessment compared to baseline at follow-up visits at week 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, (36), 40, 48, 52
Time frame: from week 16 until 48 weeks
Proportion of patients achieving DAS28-ESR remission (DAS28 < 2.6) at week 16, 24, 40, 48
Time frame: from week 16 until 48 weeks
Proportion of patients achieving DAS28-ESR low disease (DAS28 < 3.2) at week 16, 24, 40, 48
Time frame: From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 52 weeks
Change of CRP and ESR compared to baseline at all follow-up visits at week 2, 8, 12, 16, 24, 32, (36), 40, 48, 52
Time frame: At Screening
Change of RF and aCCP compared at Screening, 16, 24, and 48
Time frame: From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 48 weeks
Change in ultrasound synovitis score (if possible 3rd party blind observer, imaging subgroup only) performed at baseline and week 16, 24, 40, 48
Time frame: From baseline (day of IMP administration) until up to 48 weeks
Numbers of rheumatoid nodules and the diameter of one target nodule at baseline, week 24 and 48
Time frame: From week 2 until up to 52 weeks
Safety parameters:
Time frame: Week 26
Explorative analysis of the effect of standard care treatment in patients with insufficient response to the investigational medicinal product
Time frame: At Screening
Descriptive analysis of change in ACR20/50/70, EULAR Response and DAS28 in RF-positive and RF-negative patients, respectively
Time frame: week 16
Change of RF and aCCP compared at Screening, 16, 24, and 48
Time frame: week 24
Change of RF and aCCP compared at Screening, 16, 24, and 48
Time frame: week 48
Change of RF and aCCP compared at Screening, 16, 24, and 48
Time frame: week 24
Numbers of rheumatoid nodules and the diameter of one target nodule at baseline, week 24 and 48
Time frame: week 48
Numbers of rheumatoid nodules and the diameter of one target nodule at baseline, week 24 and 48
Time frame: Week 36
Explorative analysis of the effect of standard care treatment in patients with insufficient response to the investigational medicinal product
Time frame: Week 48
Explorative analysis of the effect of standard care treatment in patients with insufficient response to the investigational medicinal product
Time frame: week 16
Descriptive analysis of change in ACR20/50/70, EULAR Response and DAS28 in RF-positive and RF-negative patients, respectively
Time frame: week 24
Descriptive analysis of change in ACR20/50/70, EULAR Response and DAS28 in RF-positive and RF-negative patients, respectively
Time frame: week 48
Descriptive analysis of change in ACR20/50/70, EULAR Response and DAS28 in RF-positive and RF-negative patients, respectively
Frank Behrens
Other
Addition of Rituximab to Leflunomide in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis - a Multicenter Randomised Double-blind Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03649178
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03025308
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07715045
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT00055055
Arthritis, Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details