Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00531167

Adding Adefovir Dipivoxil Versus Switching to Entecavir in Patients With Lamivudine-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B

Antiviral resistance mutations limit the efficacy of therapy for chronic hepatitis B. At year 2, resistance to adefovir may occur as high as 25% in patients with history of lamivudine resistance. Resistance to entecavir is reported to be 10% in lamivudine refractory patients during the same period. However, combination of lamivudine and adefovir decreased the adefovir resistance rate as low as 0% in the recent studies. By overcoming the antiviral resistance, the efficacy of therapy will be maximized. This study is intended to compare the efficacy of two strategies, combination of lamivudine and adefovir vs. entecavir monotherapy in patients with lamivudine resistance.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

16 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Recently, published data showed combination of lamivudine and adefovir lead to PCR negativity (<1000 copies/mL) up to 80% in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B at year 2 [Rapti et al. Hepatology 2007 Feb;45(2):307-13.]. Other studies also showed 76% and 69% PCR negativity in mostly HBeAg negative subjects [Lampertico et al. Hepatology 2006 Oct;44(4) Suppl 1:556A-557A, Lampertico et al. Hepatology 2006 Oct;44(4) Suppl 1:693A-694A].

In the study for the treatment of lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients which included HBeAg positive subjects more predominantly, entecavir monotherapy showed 34% of PCR negativity (<300 copies/mL) at year 2 [Tenney DJ, et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Mar;51(3):902-11].

Although it is assumed that combination of lamivudine and adefovir would be more effective than entecavir monotherapy for lamivudine resistant patients, we cannot verify the assumption, because there is no data directly comparing these two strategies until now.

The aim of this study is to determine the most effective therapy for the patients with lamivudine resistant chronic hepatitis B. We will compare the PCR negativity (<60 IU/ml) of HBV DNA at year 2 in patients receiving 'the combination of lamivudine and adefovir' and 'entecavir monotherapy'.

Since we are planning to include lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients regardless of HBeAg status, we assumed the PCR negativity (<300 copies/mL or <60 IU/mL) in adefovir-lamivudine combination and entecavir monotherapy group as 55% and 34%, respectively, considering HBeAg status and lower detection limit of PCR.

The result of this study will be able to clearly demonstrate the superiority of combination therapy with lamivudine and adefovir to entecavir monotherapy, which provide us the guide to rescue therapy for patients with lamivudine resistant HBV.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic hepatitis B patients (positive HBsAg > 6 months)
  • Age > 16 year old
  • Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >1.5 x ULN
  • History of treatment with lamivudine more than 6 months
  • Proven lamivudine resistant mutation
  • HBV DNA level> 20000 IU/mL
  • Compensated liver disease (Child-Pugh-Turcotte score over 7; prothrombin time prolonged more than 3 sec above ULN or INR over 1.5; serum albumin >3 g/dL; total bilirubin <2.5 mg/dL; No history of variceal bleeding, ascites, or hepatic encephalopathy)
  • Patients willing to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Out of inclusion criteria
  • Any one of following
  • Serum phosphorus level under 2.4 mg/dL
  • Serum creatinine level over 1.5 mg/dL or creatinine clearance <50 mL/min
  • Absolute neutrophil count lower than 1000 cell/mL
  • Hb level under 10 g/dL (male), under 9 g/dL (female)
  • Serum AFP >100 ng/mL
  • History of treatment with interferon-a, thymosin-alfa 1, or nucleos(t)ide analogue other than lamivudine in 6 months of screening
  • Recipient of organ transplantation
  • Positive antibody test to HIV, HCV or HDV
  • Pregnant or breast feeding women
  • Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or uncontrolled malignant disease
  • Habitual alcohol drinker (>140 g/week for men, >70 g/week for women)

Treatment and study plan

combination of lamivudine+adefovir vs entecavir

Drug

Lamivudine 100 mg/day, Adefovir 10 mg/day, Entecavir 0.5 mg/day

Other names: Zeffix, Hepsera, Baraclude

Primary outcomes

  1. PCR negativity (<60 IU/ml) of HBV DNA

    Time frame: At the end of year 2 (since starting rescue therapy for lamivudine resistance)

Secondary outcomes

  1. 1. PCR negativity (<60 IU/ml) of HBV DNA at year 1 (interim analysis) 2. Degrees of HBV DNA reduction 3. ALT normalization 4. HBeAg seroconversion 5. Development of resistant mutation 6. Virologic breakthrough 7. Biochemical breakthrough

    Time frame: At the end of year 2 except interim analysis

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Korea University

Other

Collaborators

  • GlaxoSmithKline

Registry information

Official study title

Prospective Randomized Study for the Comparison of Adding Adefovir Dipivoxil and Switching to Entecavir in Patients With Lamivudine-resistant Chronic Hepatitis B

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2012
First posted
Sep 18, 2007
Registry last updated
Oct 22, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.